Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Coming

By Ayepecks
in Gamers' Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Ayepecks

Posted
Posted

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/43345/Ca...equels-Revealed

Kind of "meh" to me. I was hoping for something all new from Infinity Ward, like the rumored sci-fi FPS they were working on. They make good games, though, so it's hard to complain. Not confirmed that it's them and not Treyarch making the game, though.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/705844-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-coming/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Corris Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Good news, they better do a good job.

So they're going for a new CoD title every year? They better be careful. People will catch on to rehashed tricks after a while. However, I'll be glad to see the modern weapons returning.

Its two different studios releasing them every other year, giving them essentially 2 years dev time each, and they already have a next gen engine used in CoD4/WaW that was developed by these guys.

So It shouldn't be that bad, as long as they do something special next to WaW.

Grand Master

Sethos

Posted
Posted
I'm just amazed people got mad at EA for doing Battlefield every so often, yet hardly anyone ever seems outraged at these Call of Duty games, and only half I'd say are really worth it -- same with Battlefield.

1) I'd have to kill someone if they created anything "Sci-fi", eugh!

2) EA is the synonym for crappy games, IW is not.

Grand Master

Digitalx

Posted
Posted

I hope battlefield 3 comes out sooner then later. World at war has to be one of the worse nerrated games I've come accross. Not only that but it comes off looking and playing and generally feeling like a really good mod of CoD 4 then a stand alone game. Imo, leave WW2 now to Brothers in Arms to finish. As for this next one, they better make something impressive or people are just going to go meh.

Also sci-fi version would be a very bad mistake. look at BF2142 compared to BF2, epic fail. That's the worst thing they could probably do to a traditionally realistic game series.

Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I'm looking forward to better gameplay and graphics as well as a new storyline. That, and a bunch of new weapons/perks. :)

PS: Infinity Ward better work on this one otherwise I'll... cry.

Grand Master

Coldgunner

Posted
Posted

Give me COD: Vietnam or something. Treyarch should have a restraining order against approaching said franchise. COD4 was good, but I feel that modern warfare will soon become overused.

COD7: Future Warfare can simply foxtrot oscar.

Experienced

Cyplex

Posted
Posted
I hope battlefield 3 comes out sooner then later.

I'm thinking BF3 is myth, BF2 has/d a large follower crowd however no show regarding info/teasers of a sequel (No 2142 does not count).

I really like COD4 however the maps are VERY small resulting in a arcade feeling rather than teamwork :-(.

Grand Master

Green_Eye

Posted
Posted
I'm thinking BF3 is myth, BF2 has/d a large follower crowd however no show regarding info/teasers of a sequel (No 2142 does not count).

I really like COD4 however the maps are VERY small resulting in a arcade feeling rather than teamwork :-(.

Then you must be playing with the wrong team, me and some friends can execute military type maneuvers and tactics on 90% of all maps in COD 4 and rarely ever lose as a result.

Just sayin ;)

Grand Master

+Audioboxer Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

They should slow it down a bit.

Every 2 years or something, or rotate, one year COD, next year another game, then COD, etc - If they feel they have the skills to pump out titles.

You're used to seeing sports games every year, but I dunno if FPS titles can start going that way :/

Launching a game out every year will slow down how much it actually goes through evolution and is a significant step up, as opposed to being really just an "expansion pack". That's okay for sports games as they have no story script, they remain the same progression wise, just have better visuals/game play tweaks and new rosters.

Insomniac pump out a title every year, rotating between Resistance and other stuff, and while they constantly make solid titles, you sometimes think if they slowed it down a bit they'd be able to add those extra layers of polish.

Look at how ridiculous Killzone 2 is looking, and fair enough when released that will have like a 3/4 year development time period. However it shows that taking a bit longer can help, even if it's just 2 years as opposed to 1.

To be fair though, the COD crowd will lap up more of the same, so let's see how this progresses. Seeing as Treyarch made the last, this game "Warfare 2", will essentially have had 2 years in development I believe, or at least longer than a year. But if Infinity take over doing all COD games now, that will be them each year.

Grand Master

Brad.

Posted
Posted

Every year is great!

Treyarch then IW, Treyarch then IW.

Get better games as a result as the developers spend 2 years on each title. COD4 Was awesome, WaW is awesome imo and I have no doubt that the next game will be awesome :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.