Why is watching 720p Youtube vids so cpu intensive?


Recommended Posts

As many of you might know by now, youtube videos can be watched in 720p HD quality by adding "&fmt=22" to the end of video urls. I use a Greasemonkey plugin called YousableTubeFix and dev updated the script yesterday with a feature that automatically switches to 720p quality when available.

But, the problem I noticed when watching these 720p vids is my cpu usage started shooting up to 50-100% usage and the video played less smoothly than it normally does at lower quality levels. Anyone know why this happens? I have a AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-56 1.8Ghz and 2gigs of memory.

What what what?.. Youtube now offer 720p?.. yeah right!

Last time I checked they offered high quality videos..but still the Quality was not that good.. I have never seen a good quality high-res Video on youtube... What I have seen are Videos that where 720p Compressed on youtube (poorly) and uploaded.. The outcome = Rubbish Viewing.

If this is a new feature.. please do share the news.

Now back to topic; Have you updated your version of Flash to the new version?

whoa! that's amazing! is there a section just for High Quality Videos?

OP: The Video Plays perfectly fine for me, maybe updating Flash will help?

Flash is poorly optimized yes, but even there, a 720p video would be hard on the CPU if not hardware accelerated by the GPU.

I have updated to Flash 10 since it was first released. But, you are probably are right on the GPU part. I have a crappy integrated Radeon x1200, which probably pushes most of the load onto the CPUs. Completely overlooked the GPU when I made my decision to buy this laptop two years ago and kind of regretting it. So for now, I guess I'm stuck with watching just plain "high quality" instead of HD.

From your first post it looks like you are using Firefox.. try running Firefox in Safemode and trying to see if the Video playback is better. Firefox still seems to be a big memory hog.

also you might as well check out alternative browsers

Oh my! How could I not have know this? :|

Very smart of youtube to do this, maybe I'll start browsing there a bit more again.

Oh my! How could I not have know this? :|

Very smart of youtube to do this, maybe I'll start browsing there a bit more again.

Man I am as shocked as you.. I am glad Youtube now have this! Just hope they don't pull a Stage6 with this move.

Doesn't matter much if you have a powerful videocard: flash just stinks for video. If you wanna watch 720p, better get the h.264 version (mp4).

Not much of an issue in Windows (I get 20-30% CPU in Windows Vista x64), but on my MBP (with the 9600M) it's nearly unwatchable. Same goes for linux.

Doesn't matter much if you have a powerful videocard: flash just stinks for video. If you wanna watch 720p, better get the h.264 version (mp4).

Not much of an issue in Windows (I get 20-30% CPU in Windows Vista x64), but on my MBP (with the 9600M) it's nearly unwatchable. Same goes for linux.

Is there a way to switch from Flash to quicktime Video or something?

The 720p link Prickly posted didn't really seem that cpu intensive to me. It averaged around 25-30% and peaked at a mere 35% on my athlon64x2 4000+ @ 2.82ghz. I've seen flash do much worse than that without 720p video.

If hulu can't live up to 720p, youtube may have won

Hulu already has a small designated HD section for 720p and 1080p that works amazingly, but the selections are limited to some old episodes. There are probably some server-side and website kinks and capacity that need to be worked out before they do a wide release for all of their shows and movies. I don't see them losing the advantage they have anytime soon given that it is the best online tv show/movie player there is.

Doesn't matter much if you have a powerful videocard: flash just stinks for video. If you wanna watch 720p, better get the h.264 version (mp4).

Not much of an issue in Windows (I get 20-30% CPU in Windows Vista x64), but on my MBP (with the 9600M) it's nearly unwatchable. Same goes for linux.

Yep, the greasemonkey script called YousableTubeFix is amazing and has features that allows for watching 720p in mp4 format. Did a little more testing on a few other vids and its still consistantly around 50-60% usage on both cores, around 20-30% on another computer better hardware. Must be mostly flash and a little bit of hardware too.

As much as I love to rag on Flash for being total crap, my CPU usage doesn't go above 5% while playing back that video. Though, this is on a Q9540.

Give me some reasons why?

Vastly more secure, efficient, and better video quality?

As much as I love to rag on Flash for being total crap, my CPU usage doesn't go above 5% while playing back that video. Though, this is on a Q9540.

Vastly more secure, efficient, and better video quality?

Can you please elaborate on that?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!