Art Institute Online


Recommended Posts

This is more of a slight rant/looking to get opinions possibly. I had inquired with the Art Institute Online division in the Pittsburgh area to look into online classes for web design. I went ahead and spoke with an admissions counselor and did all the up front meet and talk about what I want etc etc. I then began to fill out the online application and stopped part way through simply because I was too busy with other stuff for work primarily. That and the fact that I am not 100% sure I want to do online courses with AI.

Over the course of 2 weeks I think I received almost 50 calls (no exaggeration) from AI (nearly all of which I ignored as I felt that I would contact them when I was ready and sure I wanted to go there). A day or two ago I finished up the application (finally) and stopped at the payment screen as I wanted to be sure I was 100% sure I wanted to do this. Within 5 minutes of closing out of the payment screen (to go back later to) I was getting calls AND emails from the admissions person at AI... not just 1 or 2.. I got 4 emails all saying "CALL ME NOW!" and 6 phone calls within 40 minutes.

I emailed the admissions person back (no way I was calling them) and told them flat out if I got one more call or email they could consider me as not going there... it got to the point that I was so irritated with them that I am 99% sure I am not going due to the fact they have been basically stalking me for 2 weeks. The admissions "director" emailed me back to apologize and said the admissions person I was working with was " a bit over zealous"... a bit?

Am I over reacting here?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/705990-art-institute-online/
Share on other sites

Certainly not over-reacting. No one likes to be harassed, and that's exactly what they're doing: trying to harass you into making a decision that you'd prefer to take your time with.

I looked at the Art Institute of San Francisco, a couple of years ago. They sent a few catalogs which, truth be told, I rather enjoyed looking through--they were very well done. However, they kept sending more and more stuff, and eventually started e-mailing and calling as well. It wasn't quite to the level of what you're experiencing. I received maybe all of 7 calls in 3 months, some of which I answered, some of which I ignored. I'd receive maybe one or two e-mails every other week with upcoming seminars and what-not. It really wasn't too bad, but even with that much I was getting irritated. They have since stopped calling, sending mail, and any e-mails I might have gotten have gone to my junk folder.

They're somewhat like leeches; very difficult to shake off. You certainly should not let them bully you into making a decision, and I think you handled the situation perfectly.

-Emily

I go to the Art Institute of California, Orange County, and when I was in the process of applying a year and a half ago I didn't get that many phone calls or emails. I think it's rediculous that they kept calling you, and I don't think that you were / are over reacting.

i did the same exact thing, i talked to the admissions counselor, then i filled out the app half way, and just never got back to it. and i literally got 2 calls a day for like a week or 2, then they would call like every couple of weeks. not to mention all the emails i got about how i didn't complete the online app. they hassle people big time.

nothing yet, it kinda got put on the back burner. need a new car. and i just don't make enough money right now to be able to go to school.

still kind jumping around on what i really want to go to school for. cause i like computer, electronics, science, ect. lol. i've taken some classes on universalclass.com.

Let me tell you schools like that are all about the marketing, Full Sail is no different I go here for the Film Bachelors Program. I also work for the Behind The Scenes Department a major monthly event they put on for prospective students and parents where they'll fly on down here and check out the school. In the Questions tent which is where you go after your tour for food and questions they've got tons and tons of flat screens just to show the name of the department those people represent. But it's all fancy stuff you'd think it was some type of trade show. They have commercials made, and whole intro sequences and everything. These types of Technical schools are all about the money they can bring in.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!