Could Neowin Produce a Good Linux Singleplayer Game?


What Kind of Singleplayer Game Would You Like To See?   

49 members have voted

  1. 1. Would You Like to See a Linux-based Singleplayer game?

    • Yes
      40
    • No
      9
  2. 2. What Kind of Game Would You Like To See Developed

    • First Person Shooter (FPS)
      18
    • Deus Ex, Shockz, Half-Life Like
      11
    • Adventure Game
      11
    • Simple Game (Linear)
      9


Recommended Posts

I think your aiming a bit to high, if you actually want to complete a project rather than have it in a perpetual state of 'nothing', then I think you need to set your sights much lower.

This idea was put forward 3 days ago with just an idea

Today we have a central focus, a theme and several writers who've volunteered to contribute their time and energy

We're more than on schedule :)

This idea was put forward 3 days ago with just an idea

Today we have a central focus, a theme and several writers who've volunteered to contribute their time and energy

We're more than on schedule :)

You're trying to create a fully blown game with a bunch of people you are hoping to recruit over the Internet. I am definitely not saying its going to be impossible, I am merely saying you would, in my opinion, be better off starting with some a lot smaller.

Eve and Wow are MMO's which by definition are huge by any measure, the goal here is something that large. Breathe, it's okay man :)

I recall that, Duke Nukem "Whenever" has changed engines at least once in it's development.

And that's okay, I appreciate your insight.

That's why I listed how many actual developers there are, and for CCP how many people they outsource as well. CCP themselves don't do very much work on their servers. I'd say only about 100 people working for them do server work. They simply have a better system than blizzard. They do have HUNDREDS of outsourced developers though. Even Blizzard, which makes very few games has 200 developers. WHat has come out since WoW 4 years ago? Nothing but expansions (which are a lot easier and less time consuming, though they do make constant improvements). Before that I believe their last game was Diablo 2, which was in 2000. Starcraft 2 is rumored to come out september '09 and they've been working on it for a long, long time now. HL2 took 7 years to make. Prey was in the making for 11 years!

My point is that it takes these relatively large companies a lot of man hours to create the games you're seeing. It doesn't matter if it's an MMO or not, technically there's very little difference when it comes to the coding. The only way to undertake such a large project would be with a lot of money in order to hire people and keep them interested in it throughout it's production cycle, otherwise, like I said, everybody will just drop out at one point or another.

You're trying to create a fully blown game with a bunch of people you are hoping to recruit over the Internet. I am definitely not saying its going to be impossible, I am merely saying you would, in my opinion, be better off starting with some a lot smaller.

I'll keep that in mind, but as of now I'm very happy with the progress we're making. I'm grateful to each of our contributors and I look forward to fleshing out a storyline fairly soon.

That's why I listed how many actual developers there are, and for CCP how many people they outsource as well. CCP themselves don't do very much work on their servers. I'd say only about 100 people working for them do server work. They simply have a better system than blizzard. They do have HUNDREDS of outsourced developers though. Even Blizzard, which makes very few games has 200 developers. WHat has come out since WoW 4 years ago? Nothing but expansions (which are a lot easier and less time consuming, though they do make constant improvements). Before that I believe their last game was Diablo 2, which was in 2000. Starcraft 2 is rumored to come out september '09 and they've been working on it for a long, long time now. HL2 took 7 years to make. Prey was in the making for 11 years!

My point is that it takes these relatively large companies a lot of man hours to create the games you're seeing. It doesn't matter if it's an MMO or not, technically there's very little difference when it comes to the coding. The only way to undertake such a large project would be with a lot of money in order to hire people and keep them interested in it throughout it's production cycle, otherwise, like I said, everybody will just drop out at one point or another.

Ok, thanks for your insight.

Listen to MR_Candyman, he knows what he's talking about. It's not "forget about it", it's "set a realistic goal", and a fully-fledged FPS even remotely comparable to successful commercial titles is not one. Video games are often compared to movies : is it realistic for a small unpaid team to produce a 120 minutes action-adventure movie ? Unless you have a very original idea that will take very few ressources to make, like The Blair Witch Project, no. Incidentally, even The Blair Witch Project was 4 years in concepts, 8 months of production and costed 35000$.

Listen to MR_Candyman, he knows what he's talking about. It's not "forget about it", it's "set a realistic goal", and a fully-fledged FPS even remotely comparable to successful commercial titles is not one. Video games are often compared to movies : is it realistic for a small unpaid team to produce a 120 minutes action-adventure movie ? Unless you have a very original idea that will take very few ressources to make, like The Blair Witch Project, no. Incidentally, even The Blair Witch Project was 4 years in concepts, 8 months of production and costed 35000$.

That's why I'm more enthusiastic about a 3D platform adventure game not a FPS ...

You're trying to create a fully blown game with a bunch of people you are hoping to recruit over the Internet. I am definitely not saying its going to be impossible, I am merely saying you would, in my opinion, be better off starting with some a lot smaller.

Take this to heart. It is a pain in the arse to get internet acquaintances to work for more than a year on a project, let alone make alot of progress in that time. I have worked on online game projects before and it is extremely slow goings. Not that it isn't a cool experience.

Take this to heart. It is a pain in the arse to get internet acquaintances to work for more than a year on a project, let alone make alot of progress in that time. I have worked on online game projects before and it is extremely slow goings. Not that it isn't a cool experience.

I'd be very interested in hearing about your experience with the project!

Items such as what went right and what went wrong will help greatly in the success of this project.

This is the kind of game a small unpaid indie but very talented team might be able to achieve :

It looks very fun and creative, but it's not a FPS. Also, it's made with XNA (Windows + Xbox 360 only), which makes the development much easier than, say, C++ with only SDL + OpenGL, kinda stuff you would use on Linux. If you were into making that kind of thing I would definitely like to join and invest as many hours as necessary, even with my very newbie C# skills.

I'd be very interested in hearing about your experience with the project!

Items such as what went right and what went wrong will help greatly in the success of this project.

The biggest problem with an online game project isn't the project itself but the lack of ability to make sure people get things done in a timely manner. If they are being lazy or half assed they can just log off for an extended period of time and disappear. Another really hard thing to do in a free project is find talented people to help you without pay. I recruited at least 3 artists who said they would do such a thing, and in the end all I got was one peice of concept art and three bailed artists. The only thing I ever really got out of the first project I worked on was a storyline which is one of my favorites and one that I helped write. It is alot harder to get people to remain focused than it sounds like it would.

But, personally, I am all for trying and wouldn't mind helping out on this project either. Of course, all I am really good at is interface design, 2D graphics and advertisment design. I can design MP maps for primarily FPS games but if it isn't going to be a Source mod or something along those lines and it will end up being an XNA arcade game then I'm not sure what I could do for the developement and brainstorming processes other than provide feedback.

The biggest problem with an online game project isn't the project itself but the lack of ability to make sure people get things done in a timely manner. If they are being lazy or half assed they can just log off for an extended period of time and disappear. Another really hard thing to do in a free project is find talented people to help you without pay. I recruited at least 3 artists who said they would do such a thing, and in the end all I got was one peice of concept art and three bailed artists. The only thing I ever really got out of the first project I worked on was a storyline which is one of my favorites and one that I helped write. It is alot harder to get people to remain focused than it sounds like it would.

But, personally, I am all for trying and wouldn't mind helping out on this project either. Of course, all I am really good at is interface design, 2D graphics and advertisment design. I can design MP maps for primarily FPS games but if it isn't going to be a Source mod or something along those lines and it will end up being an XNA arcade game then I'm not sure what I could do for the developement and brainstorming processes other than provide feedback.

Every hand helps! I don't know if Linux has an XNA like component ( I doubt it does but I'll have to research it and post back here on it) but if it does I guarantee we'll be using it.

This is the kind of game a small unpaid indie but very talented team might be able to achieve :

It looks very fun and creative, but it's not a FPS. Also, it's made with XNA (Windows + Xbox 360 only), which makes the development much easier than, say, C++ with only SDL + OpenGL, kinda stuff you would use on Linux. If you were into making that kind of thing I would definitely like to join and invest as many hours as necessary, even with my very newbie C# skills.

Unfortunately work blocks Youtube, I'll check this out when I get home tonight. Thanks!!!

XNA is Windows + Xbox360 + Zune only. No Linux.

That doesn't mean indie game development is necessarily much harder on Linux, I should correct that. There's Ogre3D for helping with graphics, for instance. I've no experience with it, but several indie projects have been done with it. Also, there are 3D extensions for Java, there's pyGame, which is built on top of SDL... So, it's definitely feasible, though not necessarily as streamlined and well integrated as XNA in Visual Studio 2008.

I'm not very hot about developing a game strictly for Linux because

- I don't use Linux

- Nobody uses Linux

I mean if you said we'll make cross-platform with Linux compatibility, ok, maybe it's worth it for that handful of Linux users interested in playing a game on that platform, but if you say that it's the primary target platform I think you're killing any chance of actual success or recognition right there.

Edited by Dr_Asik

^^^ If it is using any of the open source engines discussed, it would be fully cross-platform. Linux means "Linux and Windows" in this case.

The thread just started in the Linux subforums, but would be cross-platform.

^^^ If it is using any of the open source engines discussed, it would be fully cross-platform. Linux means "Linux and Windows" in this case.

The thread just started in the Linux subforums, but would be cross-platform.

Maybe in theory, but in practice, using cross-platform tools doesn't automatically make your fully working and debugged Linux game fully working and debugged on Windows, and vice-versa. You'll have to compile separate binaries for each platform and do the testing on each. XNA is cross-platform Xbox360/PC, for instance, but if you develop strictly with the PC in mind, you won't be able to run it on Xbox360, because it doesn't use the same controls, it doesn't use the same file system, it doesn't run the same version of .NET Framework, the GPU works differently, it runs on TVs instead of computer monitors, etc. So developping a game for Linux and developping a cross-platform game are two different things. And from the title of this thread and the starting post it seemed the idea was to develop a game for Linux.

*raises hand* I umm...have been known to make the odd game here and there (ok, one really bad commercial title that's not quite out yet) and I'd be happy to lend some insight into this:

By definition, FPSs aren't actually that hard to make, for the basics at least. You can get a decent enough FPS engine up quite quickly. I've coined up a couple within a matter of hours (Very basic, though, little more than 3d movement and a bit of collision detection), but when it comes to (good) commercial games, half the reason they take so long is the actual design and mainly the art work (in my experience, at least).

One thing I've noticed from reading this thread is that people seem to have got caught up on the idea of "cross platform" vs. Linux and that's not a good sign. Not because of the issue, but because it shows that the focus is way off and that people will get easily side-tracked by relatively minor issues, potentially missing out on important ones.

Also, although it's easy to say "Lets make a great FPS with a good singleplayer campaign, with a good story to rival a commercial game", but right away the problem I see there is that the first point was "Lets make an FPS game" and then a "good story" was tacked on. A good story depends on how the story is told, not just the story itself. It's usually better to come up with a good story, then decide how you want to tell it rather than say "Ok, lets make an FPS game" and then build the story around it.

Going back to the "Lets make a game for Linux" thing, you have to keep in mind that it takes a lot of effort to make a decent game, it takes a lot of talent working together to pull it off and there's a problem - you need to get people on-board, now how many of the possible talent on neowin do you think actually run Linux? Chances are if someone on this forum isn't running windows, it's because they have a Mac and even then, they'll likely run bootcamp. In other words, to make a game for Linux, your best bet is to aim for a cross-platform solution, so those not running Linux can still contribute to it.

And yes, using a cross-platform engine doesn't necessarily mean your application is cross-platform, but usually in that instance, you do stuff to break the cross-platform conformity of it, rather than simply not anticipating it. For example, you can use a library called "SDL" to set up the basic workings of it, i.e. create a window and attach OpenGL to it (which is also cross-platform) and it'll be pretty much certain to run on Windows, Mac, Linux and anything else that supports it (Which is quite a lot these days), but if you add a line of code to call a Wind32 MessageBox(), then it's not going to run on anything other than windows.

Edited by Kushan

Good post Kushan. FPS games have been so done to death the basics are almost hard wired into most gamers these days. As Kushan said, the hardest part is making the game fit a good story line rather than making a good game with a story, too. I also agree with him on making a cross-platform game. Linux is less than 2% of the market, so making a game on it would be really pointless for most of the people in this forum as well as most of the rest of your potential players.

Overall, if we just want to "Make a good game", then we need to stick to arcade style games such as modifications/enhancements of pong, breakout, etc. If there is going to be a significant storyline, then an FPS or even an adventure game would be our best option. With certain dev tools we could have a really quick FPS running (Unreal Ed, Source, even Halo Custom Edition and its editor for possible Mac cross-platforming). If we do end up making an FPS game, I personally have a pretty compelling, although possibly WAY too deep, story outlined and in the process of being fleshed out. I am, in fact, going to meet the writer tomorrow so maybe I can coax him back into seriously finishing it. If it is to be an arcade game, I have something lined up for that as well.

Why would it be single player? A game developed by a community, Single Player? Where the hell are your community instincts... It could be Multi-Single Player!!!!? Co-op!

We're going to start off with a singleplayer, and once that's out the door... then we can expand. First things first though :)

So let's say it's feasible, as long the aims are kept realistic.

So who's the chief producer ? Time to put up a web page with clearly stated goals, participants, tentative schedule, email address at which people can write if they're interested in participating in the project. Time to start discussing technology, storyline, art direction, gameplay design. Until some basic management and conceptual work is done, the project is unlikely to go anywhere. I might very well join in the project, but no one can join a purely hypothetical project.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Marshall Major V Bluetooth headphones are now up to 47% off on Amazon by Ivan Jenic The Marshall Major V in Midnight Blue is currently $89.99 on Amazon, down from $169.99. That's 47% off and $80 saved on a pair of wireless on-ear headphones from one of the most recognizable names in audio. The Major V is Marshall's take on a long-lasting everyday headphone. The headphones deliver 100+ hours of wireless playtime, which puts them in a completely different category from most Bluetooth headphones that hover around 30-40 hours. You’re charging this thing once a week at most, and with wireless charging supported, you don’t have to worry about additional cables. Marshall promises its signature sound profile, with strong bass, smooth mids, and clear highs. There’s a customizable M-button, which you can set to quickly access Spotify Tap, your EQ settings, or a voice assistant. The design is foldable and lightweight at 186 grams, so it’s easy to pack for travel. And finally, the faux leather finish gives the Major V a sleek, premium look. At $89.99, the Major V Midnight Blue is a genuinely strong buy for anyone who wants a reliable daily headphone without paying premium prices. It’s also worth mentioning that the Cream and Brown variants are also discounted to $89.99, though from a lower original price of $99.99. Marshall Major V Midnight Blue - $89.99 | 47% off on Amazon This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • +1 on XVI. I still use it. 
    • Age 16, old enough to get a full-time job, your own bank account, a passport, get married, even join the military and go to war. But talking to your friends on the internet? Oh hell no!
    • I remember when all games had demos; it was a normal thing, not a limited time promotion.
    • Forza Horizon 6 gets big bug-fixing and balancing update by Taras Buria Today, Playground Games released a big Forza Horizon 6 update with a long list of fixes, patches, and balancing tweaks that the studio promised earlier. Version 375.327 is now available on Steam, Microsoft Store, and Xbox, offering users improvements for AI, audio, design, performance, road discovery, upgrades, visuals, online play, and more. Some of the most notable changes in the Series 2 update include rebalanced drivatars, particularly their difficulty and race start behavior. As such, the game should be more balanced on higher difficulty levels, and AI cars should not shoot out when the race starts as if they have rocket boosters. Speaking of difficulty, developers nerfed Drag Tires physics for a more expected and realistic behavior. They are no longer the go-to option for record-breaking times in road racing, and all leaderboard entries with drag tires will be removed. Completionists will also be glad to get a new feature that lets you see road discovery percentage in each region, which should make discovering all roads easier while keeping it quite challenging and interesting (I spent quite a long time finding the last road). Festival Playlist is also getting some much-needed fixes, including patches for bugs that allowed completing Seasonal Jobs ahead of time or where weekly challenges would not unlock for some players. Developers will retroactively give reward points to all who could not complete all challenges due to these bugs. Other changes include changes to Horizon Play progression so that it is easier to reach Level 100, audio improvements on lower-spec devices, fixes for visual glitches, including pixelated smoke, and more. Developers also addressed the currently non-working Eliminator, an online mode gamers used to farm credits with a Hummer EV exploit. Playground Games plans to re-enable it soon. As a gesture of goodwill, players will get a free McLaren Sabre. Those who used the exploit will not be banned, but developers plan to roll back credits to a maximum of 10M for all who farmed credits using the exploit. You can find the complete changelog for the latest Forza Horizon 6 update here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      483
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!