Recommended Posts

Make sure that the TOS ( terms of service ) from your ISP esp. on high speed let you run a server otherwise you might get kicked off permanently or if they're nice give you a warning.

Mine doesn't even allow and SSH server so I can connect from school to upload some files and apparently some people have been kicked off for doing it.

If you still want to do it, and I not showing people how to do this, at the very least put it on a random high port number like 3653 or 8941 ... make it up. Make sure you don't get a lot of traffic or you'll get busted.

Aside from all legal issues (ISP busting you and such)

Which server would be better in a view for me (i'm 15) and i just want to run a simple website to share photo's, files, have maybe a small forum, and a file upload thing so people can host their pics and files on my computer. ISS or Apache? I've used Apache 1.3.7 before but just a couple hours ago i formatted and i want a fresh start.

Oh btw: I have no interest in going into the heart of the source or such and modifying it, therefore just because Apache is open source doesn't cut it for me. Does IIS have some sort of GUI? Editing the http.conf files were kind of confusing for me. (not really, i'm just really lazy :D)

  ike said:
and if you want a really simple webserver so you don't have to deal with apache/IIS...if you just want to host files that don't require php or mysql or any of that, try analogx simpleserver:www http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/n...twork/sswww.htm

This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

  sebaz said:
U are aware of the fact that if you are using IIS under windowsXp/2k you can only have 10 concurrent connections at one time..i suggest that use Win2k/2003 Server (2003 has a standalone Server edition)

Yes i have read this as well although i have apache running on an xp pro machine and have not had any problems using it as an internal web server with 200 employees. Http connections dont last very long so 10 people would have to be accessing it at roughly the same exact time. While it is possible, depending on how it is being used it may never be a problem.

  vraa said:
Wow, installation of IIS was extremely easy, i just had to click about three things and bam, it's ready! I wonder if there are any mod_alias types or something, it's kinda limited or maybe it's me.
  vraa said:
Ok, IIS sucks, i'm moving to Apache, i hate having no one to guide me  :D

yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

  ike said:
yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

Your right, i was very quick in judging the server capabilities. But on the get go I get messages from Apache and (maybe its because i didn't bother) but i have so much documentation on Apache and how to get it started from nothing.

  aitf311 said:
I can get to my ip now in the address bar, but it asks for a password...anyone know why it would do that?

Because your accessing a resource in your NTFS File System that doesn't have the "Internet Guest Account" Added to the File Permissions.

Anyone who wants to access an annonymous resource on your machine, you must add the "IUSR_<ComputerName>" File Permissions.

by default, your web server is setup to accept annoymous access, if you have a file that is not part of the IUSR_<computername> group then you'll get a password, for your local username and password to access the file, since that username is part of the NTFS File Permissions.

Remember when you install IIS the default webserver directory is C:\inetpub\wwwroot

anything you place in the wwwroot folder that you want a user outside of your computer to access via the web, you must add the "IUSR_<Computername>" Account, unless you create a username and password for that user and add them to the permission table for that file/resource.

  aitf311 said:
This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

  xStainDx said:
Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

I think I already did :D

But i choose (i forget how to say past tense of that word) Apache because i've used it before, and it's super easy, also an extreme influence by some friends swayed me over.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • yeah, the "but X had it first" comments rarely add any value. Sometimes it is interesting that a feature gap for a seemingly simple feature can last for years or decades, but in this case, it is such a minor feature that I doubt anyone really cared.
    • Linux dev quits after "personal attacks" from user over Kapitano antivirus tool by David Uzondu Kapitano was a tool with a simple job: to give the ClamAV scanning engine a modern face on Linux. It relied on the ClamAV database, a massive, constantly updated list used to sniff out all sorts of nasties like viruses, worms, and Trojan horses. Since ClamAV is primarily a command-line tool, it depends on a GUI (frontend) for users who prefer not to live in the terminal. There are apps like ClamWin on Windows, ClamXav on Mac, and, until recently, Kapitano on Linux. Screenshot of Kapitano Now, the dev behind the Linux frontend, "zynequ," has marked the project as "Not Maintained" following what he described as personal attacks and harsh words. It all started when a user created an issue on the project's Codeberg page with the title, "Kaptiano resulted in 24 positives- for win.exploits and Trojans." In the post, they claimed the antivirus frontend was generating false positives on their Linux Mint system. The user noted that all the flagged files were related to the Kapitano Flatpak itself and ended with a rather aggressive warning. The whole thing seemed "strange," they said, concluding with, "program has ZERO reviews, and should remain that way until source code is verified by an independent source. DO NOT DOWNLOAD!" Zynequ, the project's author, responded by calmly referencing the wiki and explaining that the problem was with ClamAV itself, not his application. Kapitano, built with GTK4 and libadwaita, is just a wrapper that sends commands to the clamscan utility but has no say in what gets flagged. The developer also called the user out for the "personal attacks." He addressed the zero reviews situation, pointing out that this was hardly a conspiracy since the project was very new, launching back in June. Zynequ insisted that there is nothing "fishy" about their code and that it is fully open for review. The interaction soured from there. After zynequ closed the issue, the user created a duplicate one, then proceeded to resubmit the complaint under issue #13, this time with a different title: Kapitano developer is a malicious actor. Get this malware distributor blocked. After a heated back and forth with the dev, the user finally posted, "Your project is off of my laptop disk. Let it rest. Goodbye." This exchange is what led to the zynequ publishing their final note. They explained that Kapitano was "a hobby project, created in my free time without any financial support," and that it's hard to stay motivated when "personal attacks" are directed towards you. Zynequ noted that the project's code was now released into the public domain under The Unlicense, meaning anyone could fork it and do whatever they want with it. Kapitano will be delisted from Flathub, and the Codeberg repo will still be alive for a few months before they delete it and close their account for good.
    • Being harder to detect as a non-human work, doesn't justify its existence, to me.
    • Yeah and my poor choice of not questioning it is entirely my bad. Normally I check up on that stuff.
    • My apologies. I did read the entire discussion, but I mistakenly conflated your comments with dustojnikhummer's. He is the main person my comments were directed towards. Having said that, you did seem overly eager to defend his point of view based on the assumption you just quoted. I'm not sure why anyone would make that assumption, but I realize now it wasn't your assumption, you were just weighing in assuming it was true. I personally would have questioned the assumption instead of going along with it, but I do understand your perspective now. Thanks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Doreen768 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      James_kobe earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      James_kobe earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      macomen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      657
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      253
    3. 3
      Xenon
      170
    4. 4
      neufuse
      148
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      133
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!