Recommended Posts

Make sure that the TOS ( terms of service ) from your ISP esp. on high speed let you run a server otherwise you might get kicked off permanently or if they're nice give you a warning.

Mine doesn't even allow and SSH server so I can connect from school to upload some files and apparently some people have been kicked off for doing it.

If you still want to do it, and I not showing people how to do this, at the very least put it on a random high port number like 3653 or 8941 ... make it up. Make sure you don't get a lot of traffic or you'll get busted.

Aside from all legal issues (ISP busting you and such)

Which server would be better in a view for me (i'm 15) and i just want to run a simple website to share photo's, files, have maybe a small forum, and a file upload thing so people can host their pics and files on my computer. ISS or Apache? I've used Apache 1.3.7 before but just a couple hours ago i formatted and i want a fresh start.

Oh btw: I have no interest in going into the heart of the source or such and modifying it, therefore just because Apache is open source doesn't cut it for me. Does IIS have some sort of GUI? Editing the http.conf files were kind of confusing for me. (not really, i'm just really lazy :D)

  ike said:
and if you want a really simple webserver so you don't have to deal with apache/IIS...if you just want to host files that don't require php or mysql or any of that, try analogx simpleserver:www http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/n...twork/sswww.htm

This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

  sebaz said:
U are aware of the fact that if you are using IIS under windowsXp/2k you can only have 10 concurrent connections at one time..i suggest that use Win2k/2003 Server (2003 has a standalone Server edition)

Yes i have read this as well although i have apache running on an xp pro machine and have not had any problems using it as an internal web server with 200 employees. Http connections dont last very long so 10 people would have to be accessing it at roughly the same exact time. While it is possible, depending on how it is being used it may never be a problem.

  vraa said:
Wow, installation of IIS was extremely easy, i just had to click about three things and bam, it's ready! I wonder if there are any mod_alias types or something, it's kinda limited or maybe it's me.
  vraa said:
Ok, IIS sucks, i'm moving to Apache, i hate having no one to guide me  :D

yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

  ike said:
yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

Your right, i was very quick in judging the server capabilities. But on the get go I get messages from Apache and (maybe its because i didn't bother) but i have so much documentation on Apache and how to get it started from nothing.

  aitf311 said:
I can get to my ip now in the address bar, but it asks for a password...anyone know why it would do that?

Because your accessing a resource in your NTFS File System that doesn't have the "Internet Guest Account" Added to the File Permissions.

Anyone who wants to access an annonymous resource on your machine, you must add the "IUSR_<ComputerName>" File Permissions.

by default, your web server is setup to accept annoymous access, if you have a file that is not part of the IUSR_<computername> group then you'll get a password, for your local username and password to access the file, since that username is part of the NTFS File Permissions.

Remember when you install IIS the default webserver directory is C:\inetpub\wwwroot

anything you place in the wwwroot folder that you want a user outside of your computer to access via the web, you must add the "IUSR_<Computername>" Account, unless you create a username and password for that user and add them to the permission table for that file/resource.

  aitf311 said:
This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

  xStainDx said:
Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

I think I already did :D

But i choose (i forget how to say past tense of that word) Apache because i've used it before, and it's super easy, also an extreme influence by some friends swayed me over.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A rotten article full of handwaving of anti-consumer practices. Aside from the fact that no, not even close to every piece of major software collects information about its users, ethical developers make such telemetry opt-in and allow it to be completely disabled. To use KDE Plasma as an example, you're shown a greeter upon first boot that gives users the option to send the developers telemetry, with the default being off and 'off' actually meaning off. Windows 10 has never offered that capability - only a promise that Microsoft will slurp up less of your data if you spend time tweaking 50 different privacy settings. There is still absolutely no way to completely opt out of sending Microsoft telemetry in any version of Windows 10 (or 11, naturally). Even using group policy in Enterprise editions only allows you to reduce telemetry to the bare minimum. Home-focused editions don't even get that option. Articles like this dismissing user privacy concerns as "FUD" are a part of the reason Microsoft felt confident enough to go so much further with Windows 11. I guess you get what you deserve in that respect. Personally, I finally made the move to Linux after 15 years or so of dabbling with it, but never really considering a permanent switch. Enjoy your bright, shiny Windows future. You asked for it, after all.
    • Microsoft shares Defender update for new Windows 11/10 ISO installs by Sayan Sen Aside from new Windows setup and recovery updates, Microsoft has also published a new Defender update for Windows 11/10/Server installation images this week. This update package is necessary as a Windows installation image may contain old, outdated anti-malware definitions and software binaries. Aside from better security, these updates can also provide improved performance benefits in some cases. When a new Windows installation is set up, there may be a temporary security risk due to outdated Microsoft Defender protection in the OS installation images. This happens because the antimalware software included in these images might not be up to date. Thus Microsoft says that these updated definitions essentially help close this protection gap. Microsoft delivered the latest security definitions for Windows images via security intelligence update version 1.431.54.0. The Defender package version is also the same. It applies to Windows 11, Windows 10 (Enterprise, Pro, and Home editions), Windows Server 2022, Windows Server 2019, and Windows Server 2016. Microsoft writes: From Microsoft's security bulletin, we learn that the security intelligence update version 1.431.452.0 was released this past week adds threat detections for various backdoor and phishing exploits, trojans, and more. For those wondering, the latest intelligence update is version 1.431.155.0 at the time of writing.
    • Probably.   You'll probably want to see what channels you'd pick up by entering your zip code here... https://www.channelmaster.com/pages/free-tv-channels   With respect to the antenna and box you selected... no idea.  They are both non-brand names and cheap.  So...sure.  I have no idea how that box records...but it's listed as a feature. Also...I have no recommendations.  I haven't recorded from a cable box (ClearQAM) in over 10 years (maybe 20?).  This was Windows Media Center/MythTV days.  My Hauppauge is just collecting dust somewhere in my expansion slot bin.
    • Yea, I tried to do that with my janky WINDOWS MEDIA CENTER Frankenstein, and it failed miserably.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      smileyhead earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      K V earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      K V earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      CarlosABC earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      solidox earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      640
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      240
    3. 3
      Xenon
      172
    4. 4
      neufuse
      155
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      123
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!