Recommended Posts

Make sure that the TOS ( terms of service ) from your ISP esp. on high speed let you run a server otherwise you might get kicked off permanently or if they're nice give you a warning.

Mine doesn't even allow and SSH server so I can connect from school to upload some files and apparently some people have been kicked off for doing it.

If you still want to do it, and I not showing people how to do this, at the very least put it on a random high port number like 3653 or 8941 ... make it up. Make sure you don't get a lot of traffic or you'll get busted.

Aside from all legal issues (ISP busting you and such)

Which server would be better in a view for me (i'm 15) and i just want to run a simple website to share photo's, files, have maybe a small forum, and a file upload thing so people can host their pics and files on my computer. ISS or Apache? I've used Apache 1.3.7 before but just a couple hours ago i formatted and i want a fresh start.

Oh btw: I have no interest in going into the heart of the source or such and modifying it, therefore just because Apache is open source doesn't cut it for me. Does IIS have some sort of GUI? Editing the http.conf files were kind of confusing for me. (not really, i'm just really lazy :D)

  ike said:
and if you want a really simple webserver so you don't have to deal with apache/IIS...if you just want to host files that don't require php or mysql or any of that, try analogx simpleserver:www http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/n...twork/sswww.htm

This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

  sebaz said:
U are aware of the fact that if you are using IIS under windowsXp/2k you can only have 10 concurrent connections at one time..i suggest that use Win2k/2003 Server (2003 has a standalone Server edition)

Yes i have read this as well although i have apache running on an xp pro machine and have not had any problems using it as an internal web server with 200 employees. Http connections dont last very long so 10 people would have to be accessing it at roughly the same exact time. While it is possible, depending on how it is being used it may never be a problem.

  vraa said:
Wow, installation of IIS was extremely easy, i just had to click about three things and bam, it's ready! I wonder if there are any mod_alias types or something, it's kinda limited or maybe it's me.
  vraa said:
Ok, IIS sucks, i'm moving to Apache, i hate having no one to guide me  :D

yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

  ike said:
yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

Your right, i was very quick in judging the server capabilities. But on the get go I get messages from Apache and (maybe its because i didn't bother) but i have so much documentation on Apache and how to get it started from nothing.

  aitf311 said:
I can get to my ip now in the address bar, but it asks for a password...anyone know why it would do that?

Because your accessing a resource in your NTFS File System that doesn't have the "Internet Guest Account" Added to the File Permissions.

Anyone who wants to access an annonymous resource on your machine, you must add the "IUSR_<ComputerName>" File Permissions.

by default, your web server is setup to accept annoymous access, if you have a file that is not part of the IUSR_<computername> group then you'll get a password, for your local username and password to access the file, since that username is part of the NTFS File Permissions.

Remember when you install IIS the default webserver directory is C:\inetpub\wwwroot

anything you place in the wwwroot folder that you want a user outside of your computer to access via the web, you must add the "IUSR_<Computername>" Account, unless you create a username and password for that user and add them to the permission table for that file/resource.

  aitf311 said:
This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

  xStainDx said:
Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

I think I already did :D

But i choose (i forget how to say past tense of that word) Apache because i've used it before, and it's super easy, also an extreme influence by some friends swayed me over.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My experience is that a lot of the Google provided links can wide up leading nowhere, not giving you the relevant answer, or worse yet a bad malware infested link. When I see the AI generated search and read it, whether I proceed or not to webpage link depends on the answer the AI generated answer gives me. It's not a matter of whether or not the AI generated answer supports a preconceived notion I had before the search but whether or not the information it provides answers my question with enough information. If it does, I stop there. If not I look at the links or rewrite my question
    • Frostpunk 2 arrives to Xbox and PlayStation this September, hits Game Pass on day one by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe It was last year when 11 bit studios delivered its Frostpunk sequel for PC, taking players back to the winter wasteland for another crack at surviving its post-apocalyptic world. The studio is now planning to let console players get their hands on Frostpunk 2, and it's arriving almost exactly a year after the PC version and with a reworked interface suitable for controllers. While the studio already had experience with console ports thanks to its work with the original Frostpunk, it said that the major differences seen in the sequel had made the task a much more intensive one. For example, the bumpers on controllers will cycle between districts of the same type in Frostpunk 2. Meanwhile, a helpful radial menu will appear when a player selects a resource pile, filled with dynamic actions related to what's being monitored. "Initially, we tried to carry over as many interface solutions as possible," explains Igor Skibinski, production coordinator at the Frostpunk 2 team. “But the two games differ so much in terms of gameplay that we had to adapt and rework those systems over time. Still, our main focus was to make interaction with the game feel seamless - so players never have to think about how to play while they’re playing. Our ambition is to once again prove that even complex strategy games can feel intuitive and satisfying on consoles.” 11 bit studio says that the PC version will also receive the same gamepad control scheme with an update following the console version's launch. Frostpunk 2 lands on Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 on September 18. Just like the PC version that landed on PC Game Pass on day one, the Xbox Series X|S version will be available for Xbox Game Pass holders on day one too. Moreover, two physical special editions have been announced for consoles as well. The Icebreaker Edition and Whiteout Edition come with a pop-up diorama, the digital novella Warm Flesh, a behind-the-scenes digital artbook, and other goodies.
    • Use this popular dating app? Hackers may have leaked your name, ID, and private photos by David Uzondu Image via Tea A dating app has been going viral lately (you have probably seen it on X), it's called "Tea," and it lets women anonymously post pictures of men to share dating "red flags." The app's marketing claims this is all for "safety," and you can see it on the company's website, where it states its mission is "to create a safer dating environment for women." In case you're confused and need a visual explanation, the following image pretty much sums it up (click to enlarge): Image: Tea's Website Tea has been around since 2023, but the surrounding controversy helped its recent rise to the top of the app charts. Now the platform has suffered its first notable breach courtesy of users from 4chan. This breach stemmed from a classic, sloppy development mistake. The Tea developers left a backend database wide open on Google's Firebase platform. Firebase allows for quick development, but its default security settings can be disastrously permissive if they are not locked down before an app goes live. Data in Firebase is stored in things called "buckets," which are just cloud storage folders. The leaked bucket in Tea's case contained the exact verification data the app requires from its users: selfies and ID photos, which it needs to confirm that users are women. It did not take long for users on 4chan to find this open door and walk right in. One user claimed, "Yes, if you sent Tea App your face and driver's license, they doxxed you publicly!" Another user claimed they downloaded as many as 3000 images before they got rate-limited by the server. Image: 404Media They described the trove of personal information as being "raw and uncensored." As per the Terms of Use (via 404Media) before you sign up for Tea, apart from selfie and ID photos, you are required to submit your location and birth date. All of this was reportedly accessible. 404 Media says that for a while, anyone with the right URL could view a list of user files. That page has since been locked down and now returns a "Permission denied" error, likely because the developers finally became aware of the leak. Tea has stellar reviews on both the Play Store and the App Store from users who see it as a more secure version of the "Are We Dating the Same Guy?" Facebook groups.
    • I always use O&O tools, it's a German software company and they release bunch of cool free tools like O&O Shutup to disable Windows crap or O&O AppBuster that allows you to remove apps that Windows doesn't allow to remove. Really good and reliable tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Electronic Person earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      CyberCeps666 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      d4l3d earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dedicated
      Stephen Leibowitz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      Snake Doc earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      603
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      234
    3. 3
      Xenon
      159
    4. 4
      neufuse
      131
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      124
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!