Recommended Posts

Make sure that the TOS ( terms of service ) from your ISP esp. on high speed let you run a server otherwise you might get kicked off permanently or if they're nice give you a warning.

Mine doesn't even allow and SSH server so I can connect from school to upload some files and apparently some people have been kicked off for doing it.

If you still want to do it, and I not showing people how to do this, at the very least put it on a random high port number like 3653 or 8941 ... make it up. Make sure you don't get a lot of traffic or you'll get busted.

Aside from all legal issues (ISP busting you and such)

Which server would be better in a view for me (i'm 15) and i just want to run a simple website to share photo's, files, have maybe a small forum, and a file upload thing so people can host their pics and files on my computer. ISS or Apache? I've used Apache 1.3.7 before but just a couple hours ago i formatted and i want a fresh start.

Oh btw: I have no interest in going into the heart of the source or such and modifying it, therefore just because Apache is open source doesn't cut it for me. Does IIS have some sort of GUI? Editing the http.conf files were kind of confusing for me. (not really, i'm just really lazy :D)

  ike said:
and if you want a really simple webserver so you don't have to deal with apache/IIS...if you just want to host files that don't require php or mysql or any of that, try analogx simpleserver:www http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/n...twork/sswww.htm

This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

  sebaz said:
U are aware of the fact that if you are using IIS under windowsXp/2k you can only have 10 concurrent connections at one time..i suggest that use Win2k/2003 Server (2003 has a standalone Server edition)

Yes i have read this as well although i have apache running on an xp pro machine and have not had any problems using it as an internal web server with 200 employees. Http connections dont last very long so 10 people would have to be accessing it at roughly the same exact time. While it is possible, depending on how it is being used it may never be a problem.

  vraa said:
Wow, installation of IIS was extremely easy, i just had to click about three things and bam, it's ready! I wonder if there are any mod_alias types or something, it's kinda limited or maybe it's me.
  vraa said:
Ok, IIS sucks, i'm moving to Apache, i hate having no one to guide me  :D

yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

  ike said:
yep, installation of IIS is pretty easy.

...

limited? define "limited." you probably haven't noticed the multiple (to make a simpler term) "plug-in" abilities. which is what you have with apache too. perhaps apache has more options, BUT this does not mean IIS "sucks." there are a very good number of companies that rely on IIS (intel for example...microsoft should be a good enough example considering the massive hits their sites take)

but i guess it doesn't matter since you've concluded that IIS clearly "sucks" so...carry on, then :rolleyes:

Your right, i was very quick in judging the server capabilities. But on the get go I get messages from Apache and (maybe its because i didn't bother) but i have so much documentation on Apache and how to get it started from nothing.

  aitf311 said:
I can get to my ip now in the address bar, but it asks for a password...anyone know why it would do that?

Because your accessing a resource in your NTFS File System that doesn't have the "Internet Guest Account" Added to the File Permissions.

Anyone who wants to access an annonymous resource on your machine, you must add the "IUSR_<ComputerName>" File Permissions.

by default, your web server is setup to accept annoymous access, if you have a file that is not part of the IUSR_<computername> group then you'll get a password, for your local username and password to access the file, since that username is part of the NTFS File Permissions.

Remember when you install IIS the default webserver directory is C:\inetpub\wwwroot

anything you place in the wwwroot folder that you want a user outside of your computer to access via the web, you must add the "IUSR_<Computername>" Account, unless you create a username and password for that user and add them to the permission table for that file/resource.

  aitf311 said:
This worked. IIS Was making me give a username and password. I tried the windows password, the IIS FTP and Anonymous Username and Pass and nothing worked.

Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

  xStainDx said:
Incorrect File Permissions, Blame Yourself not IIS... :rolleyes:

I think I already did :D

But i choose (i forget how to say past tense of that word) Apache because i've used it before, and it's super easy, also an extreme influence by some friends swayed me over.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Another Linux utility is being rewritten in Rust by David Uzondu Greenboot, the health check tool originally written in bash, is getting a rewrite in Rust, courtesy of engineers at Red Hat. This useful tool started in mid‑2018 as a Google Summer of Code project for Fedora IoT, designed to keep atomically updated systems from self-destructing after a bad update. At its heart, Greenboot is a framework that hooks into systemd to run health checks every time a machine boots. It looks for scripts in specific directories; anything in /etc/greenboot/check/required.d/ absolutely must pass. If a required script fails, Greenboot triggers a reboot to retry. After a few failed attempts, it executes scripts in /etc/greenboot/red.d/ and initiates a system rollback to the last known-good deployment, preventing an update from bricking your system. When all required checks succeed, it runs scripts from /etc/greenboot/green.d/ and marks the boot as successful by setting a GRUB environment variable. This whole process is kicked off by the greenboot-healthcheck.service before systemd's normal boot-complete.target is reached. As for why Red Hat is choosing this rewrite, it comes down to creating a more robust and secure utility. This is definitely not the only *-rs tool rewrite we have seen lately; you have probably heard about sudo-rs, which is a project to build a memory-safe replacement for the classic sudo utility. Building these fundamental system components in a memory-safe language like Rust helps eliminate entire categories of security vulnerabilities. According to the official Fedora change proposal, the rewrite expands support for both bootc and rpm-ostree based systems, whereas the original Bash version was built only for rpm-ostree. Red Hat developers have submitted a proposal to ship this new Rust version in Fedora 43. According to Phoronix, while the plan still needs a final vote from the Fedora Engineering and Steering Committee, it looks very likely to be approved. For current Fedora IoT users, the change promises to be a simple, seamless upgrade.
    • Elden Ring Nightreign will finally gain ‘Duo Expeditions' next week by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe FromSoftware's latest project, Elden Ring Nightreign, delivered a multiplayer-focused experience for the first time. While the title offered solo runs as an alternative to its standard three-player Trio Expeditions, Duos were surprisingly missing at launch. A couple of months later, the developer is finally delivering this highly requested feature for the hit roguelike. On social media, the studio confirmed that Duo Expeditions will be hitting Elden Ring Nightreign with the next update, patch 1.02, for the game on July 30. Check out the newly released trailer showing off this mode below. As we mentioned in our review of Elden Ring Nightreign, everything from enemy health, boss aggression, player damage, and even XP gain changes depending on how many players are in the Expedition. A post-launch update even tweaked the difficulty to favor solos as well. Duos should have the same changes being applied, with the mode being easier than trios but harder than solos to complete. Making sure the difficulty is properly balanced has previously been given as the reason why the Duos mode has taken a while to come in. FromSoftware also confirmed that patch 1.02 will have a range of more quality-of-life improvements on the UI side. This will include more Relics filtering options, making custom builds easier to construct before going on new runs, as seen below. Publisher Bandai Namco also announced this week that the Elden Ring Shadow of the Erdtree expansion for the original open-world Soulslike recently passed 10 million players. Meanwhile, this Elden Ring Nightreign spin-off now has over 5 million players, making both massive successes for the publisher. While FromSoftware is now focusing on other projects, Bandai Namco isn't done with the Elden Ring universe just yet either, as a live-action movie has now been confirmed to be in development too.
    • Or you ignore the part where @Michael Scrip answered you directly.
    • The reasons for Microsoft being in near perpetual state of reorganization for two years is due to the 6 CapEx acquisitions between Jan 2022 and Jan 2023, Blizzard, Oribi, Minit, Miburo, Lumenisity and Fungible. There were 15 CapEx acquisitions in 2021 alone. Much like the Borg, Microsoft assimilates knowledge instead of expending resources on learning and development. 10 gaming companies, 3 AI and 1 data modeling companies since 2018. But then this is in the founding DNA of Microsoft, MS DOS wasn't made by MS, Windows was based on the Apple Mac and Xerox PARC Alto....and on and on. (To be fair Apple's Lisa and Mac were from the Alto also)
    • Can't get a pic of the physical server as it's in a DC, but what i'm running on it is doable. All for my own use except one VM used by a friend to run her site and other things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      d4l3d earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dedicated
      Stephen Leibowitz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      Snake Doc earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      armandointerior640 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      629
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      238
    3. 3
      Xenon
      163
    4. 4
      neufuse
      123
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      123
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!