Recommended Posts

For the past few weeks I've been getting around 1-2mb download speed. I'm paying for 6mb. Comcast has been to my house almost every other day since then, thinking that they found the problem. They never really did anything, though. The most they did was get new cables, then do speed tests over and over for about an hour. None of them new a thing about computers. "Sorry, we don't know about computers..."

Then why are they working their?

Anyway. Today they pulled out a laptop and tried it on my same connection, and they were getting around 8mbps down speed. They used the same site I did, but get better results. They're now convinced that there's something wrong with my computer. Since there's apparently only one man at Comcast who knows how to use a computer, he'll be coming up this Friday.

But I'd rather save myself the trouble of dealing with them again.

Is there any way I can determine what may be reducing my internet speed?

I've turned the firewall off. Same. Used direct modem rather than through a router. Same. Tried a different Ethernet card. Same.

To my knowledge, I don't have any strange processes running that would interfere. I just scanned the other day, the only things that were found were a few cookies. (Running NOD32, Spybot, superantispyware.) Computer's running fine.

Also, when testing on dslreports.com, when the upload speed test is running, a get a message saying "ISP compression detected, results may not be accurate." No one at comcast has any idea what "ISP compression" means. They say they're not limiting my account at all or anything.

They'd don't have the slightest clue what's wrong, since one computer gets 8mbps, while mine gets 2.

Any ideas?

I don't really know where to start...perhaps just back up everything you want on your computer and reformat? That is if you don't really care to know what is causing your problem and you're really convinced that it's your computer and not comcast throttling you.

was the person that ran the speed test doing so with or without your router connected... did he connect directly into the modem. If this is the case i have experienced this before where the router is in the process of going bad will slow down connection speed to a crawl before totally dieing.

I just reformatted about a month or two ago. It was working fine for a while, then the speed died. I tried using another account that I have on the computer that I have set to "performance" mode, with hardly anything running, and I got the same results. Already flushed the DNS a bunch of times.

Although I don't see anything in my processes that could kill my speed, there may be. I'm not the best when it comes to this kind of thing. But I don't see anything that would be using up bandwidth...

Edit: He got good results with and without the router.

Also, I wanted to try and load safemode, but for some reason my computer won't load up safemode properly... Safemode without networking sometimes works, but with networking it doesn't. My computer's somewhat stupid...Lol.

I don't really know where to start...perhaps just back up everything you want on your computer and reformat? That is if you don't really care to know what is causing your problem and you're really convinced that it's your computer and not comcast throttling you.

+1 but I don't think comcast is throttling since there isn't any problems on the laptop.

TheMelee, how are you getting around 8Mbps if your paying for 6, what site did you use? What do you get with Speedtest.net on both computers? Maybe get a livecd and test your connection under linux on the same computer.

another option if safemode does not work is to run a linux live CD and test the speed with that. just in case there is something in windows that even in safemode is wonky (such as connection configurations and such)

was the person that ran the speed test doing so with or without your router connected... did he connect directly into the modem. If this is the case i have experienced this before where the router is in the process of going bad will slow down connection speed to a crawl before totally dieing.

I just replaced a router a month or so ago because of that very same problem. Other than my connection speeds dropping I was also getting frequent disconnects.

Well, I've determined that it has to be something wrong with windows. I just ran Ubuntu and got 22mbps down. :blink:

Speeds were amazingly fast. Back to windows now, and it's down to 2mb again.

What's wrong here?

Should I screen shot my processes?

Hello,

I wonder if your computer may be infected by a form of malware using stealth or rootkit-type technologies to bypass detection by your trifecta of anti-malware software. The low bandwidth report plus the fact that you cannot start in Safe Mode implies the possibility of an infection as some malware prevents the VGA driver from initializing in Safe Mode to make their creations more difficult to remote.

You could try running an anti-rootkit program like Blacklight, GMER, RkU and so forth to see if they find anything anomalous with the system.

Another thing you might want to try is booting your computer from a Linux Live CD with anti-malware software on it in order to scan the computer from outside the normal Windows environment. One disc you can try is the Trinity Rescue Kit.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Why hasn't anyone suggested he try taking the laptop up to his room to see if it could be a line fault? (damaged cat5 can reduce speeds)

It seems people are misunderstanding and not fully reading my first few posts. The laptop was the comcast worker's. He used the same line, modem, etc. and got better speeds than my PC. I don't have a laptop.

Also, I stated I tried Ubuntu live CD (Linux based OS) and I got 22mbps download speed.

I'll try running one of the programs that goretsky mentioned.

I scanned with GMER... I have no idea how to work this program, so I saved a log.

(I'm aware that utorrent and peerguardian are running at the moment. They aren't causing the major slowdown.)

I couldn't upload the notepad file, so I uploaded it in a wordpad document.

rootkitlogthing.rtf

I'm sorry for posting three times in a row, but I was unable to edit my last post due to time constraints.

I just did another speed test on all 3 of my browsers.

Firefox: 2mb

IE: 6-8mb

Google Chrome: 7mb

Something's up with firefox...

Even though those speeds are great, why in the world was Ubuntu pulling 17-22mbps?

I'm sorry for posting three times in a row, but I was unable to edit my last post due to time constraints.

I just did another speed test on all 3 of my browsers.

Firefox: 2mb

IE: 6-8mb

Google Chrome: 7mb

Something's up with firefox...

Even though those speeds are great, why in the world was Ubuntu pulling 17-22mbps?

because you are probably doing something wrong

I'm sorry for posting three times in a row, but I was unable to edit my last post due to time constraints.

I just did another speed test on all 3 of my browsers.

Firefox: 2mb

IE: 6-8mb

Google Chrome: 7mb

Something's up with firefox...

Even though those speeds are great, why in the world was Ubuntu pulling 17-22mbps?

I used to have speed issues with FF try disabling all add-ons and the re-enabling them one by one to see if one of them is sucking bandwidth......

By disabling my (14) add-ons i got a 2 to 3 second reduction in load time...

also thank you for giving a wee project that i want to try now.

Edited by yurithedragon
I'm sorry for posting three times in a row, but I was unable to edit my last post due to time constraints.

I just did another speed test on all 3 of my browsers.

Firefox: 2mb

IE: 6-8mb

Google Chrome: 7mb

Something's up with firefox...

Even though those speeds are great, why in the world was Ubuntu pulling 17-22mbps?

What do you get on these browsers when you actually download a big file. Try something fast like a video from Revision3.

Anyone else think it might be worth bringing your system to a friend/neighbour just to make absolutely, positively sure it only happens with your Windows setup, and the problem isn't with your line/modem/router?

OTOH, since you've already established that you're getting decent speeds when running off a Live CD, that pretty much narrows it down...

Or try a clean VM, hosted through your existing Windows setup.

What do you get on these browsers when you actually download a big file. Try something fast like a video from Revision3.

Firefox - 13 to 16 minutes for a 565mb file

IE - 11-13 minutes for 565mb file

Pretty much the same thing.

Just out of curiosity, should Firefox be using 70,000k of memory usage? Last night it was using 159,000 with just one tab open. (Neowin.)

Memory leak causing the bandwidth slowdown?

Firefox - 13 to 16 minutes for a 565mb file

IE - 11-13 minutes for 565mb file

Pretty much the same thing.

Just out of curiosity, should Firefox be using 70,000k of memory usage? Last night it was using 159,000 with just one tab open. (Neowin.)

Memory leak causing the bandwidth slowdown?

Did you try disabling all add-ons?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!