24" Vs 2x20"


Recommended Posts

I would disagee with everyone and say get a 24 inch, and a 20 inch. I know it wasn't an option but for me having the 24 inch on one side and then turn the 20 inch horizontal is perfect for editing documents, email, etc.

If that doesn't suit you a single 24 will do just fine, just make sure you have a video card that can push it. Laptop integrated won't work.

ofc its for my new computer.

i can't afford more than 24" or 2x 20", no need to offer other stuff. its out of the table.

Will you have a specific use for the dual screens? I like being able to drop all my MSN conversations on to the second monitor, or for when I'm making websites, being able to have Photoshop on one monitor and my browser/notepad on the other is a big time saver.

Unless you can think of situations where a second screen will be beneficial, just take the single screen, and I'd guess that for school work and similar the only thing you'd really use it for is to drop MSN conversations (or your IM of choice) on to it, really. 24" sounds like a better choice for you.

Will you have a specific use for the dual screens? I like being able to drop all my MSN conversations on to the second monitor, or for when I'm making websites, being able to have Photoshop on one monitor and my browser/notepad on the other is a big time saver.

Unless you can think of situations where a second screen will be beneficial, just take the single screen, and I'd guess that for school work and similar the only thing you'd really use it for is to drop MSN conversations (or your IM of choice) on to it, really. 24" sounds like a better choice for you.

i am making a new project now, a big site, but im not sure it's worth the sacrifice on other things.

btw, does 4850/4870 support dual monitors? and if yes, what monitors am i getting?

i decided that i think im going dual monitors. now, i think im getting 4850, when ill be playing, i will just shut down one monitor i guess, 20" is great enough, im using 15.4 inch, anything will look huge.

so dual monitors, if im using the 4850 or 4870, what monitors and cables and adapters will i need?

It depends on the sort of work you do. For a long time I strongly preferred a single large display. Recently at work I managed to get my hands on a spare 19" LCD to compliment my existing 22" display and IMMEDIATELY I'm finding it enormously useful having an extra display, as I often have many windows open at a time and want to quickly switch between tasks.

So I guess if you don't tend to have many apps open, or will primarily be playing games I'd say a single large screen. If you do a lot of multitasking, app switching, etc then you will find value in two displays!

How is that monitor? I heard it's incredibly difficult to set up?

I thought the colors and text sharpness was great with the 223BW...but this 2433 is Out-Standing...the displays of the 21 luminance level steps was great with no banding what so ever. The only set-up issue is the stand...its inserted into a rubber gromlet and some needed to use a little water or vaseline to coat before inserting...that is the main complaint posted on newegg.com comments.

It depends on the sort of work you do. For a long time I strongly preferred a single large display. Recently at work I managed to get my hands on a spare 19" LCD to compliment my existing 22" display and IMMEDIATELY I'm finding it enormously useful having an extra display, as I often have many windows open at a time and want to quickly switch between tasks.

So I guess if you don't tend to have many apps open, or will primarily be playing games I'd say a single large screen. If you do a lot of multitasking, app switching, etc then you will find value in two displays!

Most of the time i wont be playing on it, now what 20"'ers? iwas thinking about the 2053BW

yeah, that would be like using 600x800 on a 17" screen. lol, you must have blob of icons.

please, recommend me some screens (preferably from common company's)

Samsung Syncmaster T240.

For a TN panel, it's the best I've come across. Beautiful design as well, something you don't see very often with displays.

http://www.7gadgets.com/2008/05/12/touch-o...sung-color/5130

I run 3 screens 22", and 2x19" on sides.

Right = email, msn, my game realtime watching

Center = current work or game etc

Left = mostly notes, TV etc.

Not bragging (or I'd list my comp in signature) just twelling you how usefull it is., imagine being in-game seeing email popup etc.

Saves alot time switching quick glance so much easier.

I recommend 2x20" everytime.

yeah, that would be like using 600x800 on a 17" screen. lol, you must have blob of icons.

please, recommend me some screens (preferably from common company's)

"sorry for the bad image quality..did a quickie take"...but this is my new 24" 2433BW set at resolution 1680x1050 and using it for now and not 1920x1200

1680x10502oo0.jpg

1680x1050ji9.jpg

Icons on the Desktop (1680x1050) no 'Blob' of Icons...space and proportioned

desktopiconsnb1.jpg

the monitor's scaling is superb......(thats NO bleeding on the left side..its the camera flash...no dead pixels also)

Edited by jwjw1

I had Samsung Pebble but it had 2 dead pixels so sent back after 2 days but in those 2 dauys the duast drove me crazy on shiny surround.

Now all mine LG and I'm happier then when had my expensive back 5 years ago Iiyama ?550 for 17" ouch.

Edit: Yes 20" at 1680 will look sharper as its smaller then 22" but its splitting hairs.

Example: Play what looks bad movie on PC screen on a Iupod or similar it looks sharp as hell. Why? Your compressing detail. Same image on 42" TV looks worse then on 32" for same reason, but you still buy 42"!

Edited by stevember
From what I have seen, yes. I find that on most 22-inch displays at 1680x1050 that text and the overall picture quality isn't as sharp compared to a 20-inch display at 1680x1050.

I would sooner have 1680x1050 on a 22? rather than a 20? with that resolution.

I personally find things look too small at that resolution on a 20? screen, that?s just my preference I know a lot of people will disagree.

I would sooner have 1680x1050 on a 22" rather than a 20" with that resolution.

I personally find things look too small at that resolution on a 20" screen, that's just my preference I know a lot of people will disagree.

I used to have 1680x1050 on my previous laptop's 15.4" screen and I found it to be fantastic.

Matan, I recently got the Samsung T220P, cost me about 1300 shekel. it's awesome.

22", 1920x1200 resolution, but if you really wanna kick it, go for a 24".

or maybe a 24" Apple Cinema Display :)

anyway, dual is a waste.

סמוך עליי

מהכרות עם ישראלים, בחיים לא ראיתי אחד עם שתי מסכים

nvm the last line of you can read it, but im assuming you never tried dual screen's too, for my uses, i don't want 22" or 24", i want 2 20"'s and im thinking of buying one now and one further maybe,

BUT WHAT SCREENS! thats my question here

i want 2x20, 2x20,2x20 BUT WHAT FRIGGIN SKREENZ

I run 3 screens 22", and 2x19" on sides.

Right = email, msn, my game realtime watching

Center = current work or game etc

Left = mostly notes, TV etc.

Not bragging (or I'd list my comp in signature) just twelling you how usefull it is., imagine being in-game seeing email popup etc.

Saves alot time switching quick glance so much easier.

I recommend 2x20" everytime.

do you have a picture of that???

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree, especially if it is cloud sourced, like this one is.. but I wouldn't say no to a local AI assistant similar to the Zettlab one which would be really helpful with my large Photos library, but also to perform tasks like installing Docker apps rather than me having to do it via Docker Compose, but I don't think we're quite there yet. Synology Photos is somewhat AI, you can ask it to search for certain people (if you have tagged them and it will attempt to match similar photos to the person) and if you put a search term in for "cars" for example, it will show you all photos with a car.
    • I doubt that Google will keep the same price... it may go up from that list published.
    • Sennheiser's audiophile grade HD 600 hits lowest ever price on Amazon Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen If you are in the market for high-quality audiophile-grade over-ear headphones then Sennheiser's HD 600 are a great choice for sure, especially today on Prime Day 2026 as the product has hit its lowest ever price (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Sennheiser HD 600 has long been regarded as a reference headphone for listeners seeking a detailed and natural listening experience. It is an open-back design that is built around the idea of acoustic transparency which is essentially said to allow sound waves to move freely for a more spacious and accurate presentation by reducing turbulence and the type of distortion that can result from it. At the heart of the product is Sennheiser’s proprietary driver system featuring a 42 mm driver paired with a lightweight diaphragm and aluminum voice coils. The company says this design helps deliver fast response times and better articulate sound across the audible frequency range. Comfort and durability are also key aspects of the HD 600 as the headphones feature soft velour ear pads designed for extended listening sessions. The HD 600 comes with a detachable 3-meter cable, a 6.3 mm stereo connector, and a 3.5 mm adapter for compatibility with a wide range of audio equipment. The technical specs of the Sennheiser HD 600 are given in the table below: Specification Value Transducer Principle Dynamic, Open-Back Ear Coupling Circumaural (Over-Ear) Frequency Response 12 Hz – 40,500 Hz Sound Pressure Level (SPL) 97 dB (1 V) Impedance 300 Ω Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) < 0.1% (1 kHz, 1 V) Cable Length 3 m (9.8 ft) Connector 3.5 mm Stereo Jack Plug Included Adapter 6.3 mm (1/4") Stereo Jack Adapter Weight 260 g Magnetic Field Strength 1.8 mT Driver Size 42 mm Dynamic Driver Diaphragm Size 38 mm Get it at the link below: Sennheiser HD 600: $237.00 (Sold by Electronics Expo, Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $449.95) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • So the card is targeted at headphone users - so the review should be from someone that uses this - maybe I can review a card next time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!