Recommended Posts

Why is cable so expensive? This is how my Time Warner Cable bill looks every month:

Basic Service- $13.90

Digital Service- $63.50

Cable Box-

($7.10 each, 2 cables boxes) $14.20

Remotes-

($.25 each, 2 remotes) $.50

Earthlink Standard Internet- $44.95

GRAND TOTAL= $137.05

Over $135 a month. Isn’t that dandy. And the rates keep going up too. One day, I may get real fed up and just decide to use dial-up internet again and go back to OTA broadcast. This is ridiculous. Why on earth is cable such a rip-off?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/716528-why-is-cable-so-darn-expensive/
Share on other sites

you could try to reduce some of your digital services, maybe also buy your receivers (if they allow you).

And $45 of that is also for internet (which isn't really "cable"), but that could be decreased if you switch to a slower speed (since you're considering going back to dial up lol)

or watch tv online. I know that if it wasn't for my gf I wouldn't get cable. I only watch one show (house) and I could easily download that once a week

Then what would you do with your TV then. Use it for movies only? There's only so much movies in your library that you can watch.

I pay ?25 per month for 5Mb internet.

That is a nice deal actually. And totally understandable since internet can be helpful, unlike TV.

or watch tv online. I know that if it wasn't for my gf I wouldn't get cable. I only watch one show (house) and I could easily download that once a week

You can do that to save expenses indeed, but still, to date I can justify to myself waste time watching TV.

I've often wondered why picture quality is now a "feature". When we moved from Black and White to Color broadcasting, was the consumer required to pay extra for color programming besides having to buy a color tv? The digital transition has been a train wreck as far as I'm concerned. High Def broadcasts whether OTA or through Cable should be available to everyone with an HDTV and cables boxes should not be required unless you're paying for premium channels (HBO, Cinemax,etc.) or want On-demand content.

I've often wondered why picture quality is now a "feature". When we moved from Black and White to Color broadcasting, was the consumer required to pay extra for color programming besides having to buy a color tv? The digital transition has been a train wreck as far as I'm concerned. High Def broadcasts whether OTA or through Cable should be available to everyone with an HDTV and cables boxes should not be required unless you're paying for premium channels (HBO, Cinemax,etc.) or want On-demand content.

Welcome to Capitalism. Dont let those damn "commies" tell you its not a good thing.

Cable is actually fairly cheap over here, and the main provider, Virgin Media, operates a tiered package system (which I guess is pretty standard) - you can get a regular TV service, broadband and phone line for ?30.

Yes, there are fairly expensive packages - for example, we pay ?85 per month for our cable services, however, these packages target a specific market - not everybody needs/wants 2 PVRs, Sports/Movie channels, 20mbit broadband or unlimited phone calls.

Cable is actually fairly cheap over here, and the main provider, Virgin Media, operates a tiered package system (which I guess is pretty standard) - you can get a regular TV service, broadband and phone line for ?30.

Yes, there are fairly expensive packages - for example, we pay ?85 per month for our cable services, however, these packages target a specific market - not everybody needs/wants 2 PVRs, Sports/Movie channels, 20mbit broadband or unlimited phone calls.

but that's extra on the existing tv license you guys pay already right ?

but that's extra on the existing tv license you guys pay already right ?

Yep, if you use any equipment capable of receiving/displaying/recording a live broadcast signal you need a TV license - doesn't matter if we have cable, freeview, or just channels 1-5 :p.

There are a couple of grey areas though, such as if you own a TV but don't use it to receive a broadcast TV, or if you use a TV/other equipment which is only powered by it's own internal batteries.

Welcome to Capitalism. Dont let those damn "commies" tell you its not a good thing.

I think its a bit of a stretch for you to claim my view is communist or of an entitlement mentality. We're changing from one standard to another and to break it up in segments is the wrong way to go about it. It makes sense for internet speed packages, not for TV.

Why is cable so expensive?
Because you've convinced yourself that you need it.
Basic Service- $13.90
You can probably get most of these channels over the air.
Digital Service- $63.50
What does this cover exactly? The 60-90 additional channels that you probably only watch 3 or 4 of regularly? Why bother?
Cable Box-

($7.10 each, 2 cables boxes) $14.20

Why are you renting cable boxes? Don't you have digital TVs?
Remotes-

($.25 each, 2 remotes) $.50

Why are you renting remotes? Do you still rent your wall landline-phone from the phone company?
Earthlink Standard Internet- $44.95
My ADSL from the phone company costs half that. What does your phone company charge?
Over $135 a month. Isn?t that dandy. And the rates keep going up too. One day, I may get real fed up and just decide to use dial-up internet again and go back to OTA broadcast. This is ridiculous. Why on earth is cable such a rip-off?
Why do you need to get fed up at all? Just cancel it now.
What does this cover exactly? The 60-90 additional channels that you probably only watch 3 or 4 of regularly? Why bother?

Yep, there's about 3 or 4 channels I like and I need that package to get those channels.

Why are you renting cable boxes? Don't you have digital TVs?

Because Time Warner requires us to. We are not allowed to buy boxes. And you need a box to get additional channels.

Why are you renting remotes?

LOL. Because I need to be able to access the menu on the box and everything.

Why do you need to get fed up at all? Just cancel it now.

I may do that. Most of the good stuff seems to be OTA anyways.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!