Post here if you got the Unibody MacBook


Recommended Posts

Got the 2.0Ghz Unibody MacBook on the second day it released and I will be selling it shortly as I am upgrading to the 2.4Ghz with the backlit keyboard.

Not sure if I should save my money for the MacBook Pro since its got the higher resolution and better screen? Are you guys happy with your purchase and do you find the lower quality screen in the MacBooks fine to use?

I haven't gotten a chance to sit down and use the new Aluminum MacBook models for an extended period of time but I can tell you that the 2.4 GHz MacBook Pro is amazing, the quality of the screen is absolutely beautiful and the overall build quality is top notch, it's definitely worth the money and it will last for quite some time.

Why are you looking at upgrading to the 2.4 GHz MacBook? Is it just because it has the backlit keyboard? If you're worried about the screen resolution, you could always get a separate USB or Bluetooth keyboard and mouse and hook up an external monitor.

I am VERY happy with my purchase, but I got to admit the screen is the huge weakness in all that. I wish it was better. Now I'm used to it a little more :-\

Other than that, I cannot critcize it, it's got power, a kinda nice video card, a great design, great materials, a great keyboard, it's not getting dirty so easily, it's got a nice webcam and mic, OS X runs really nicely on it, etc. etc.

wha u got

The 2.4Ghz MacBook. I love it. It's a solid built machine. It's fast. Does what I need. And I can play games on it if I want to, although I rarely do.

But the thing I love the most about it is definitely the build quality. I've never handled a more solid laptop in my life.

I have the 2.0GHz MacBook and i LOVE it. it's a beauty. WAY superior to the classic white MB. the backlit keyboard, larger HD and better processor weren't worth 300USD to me ;)

what i love about it? the ambient light sensor that adjusts the backlight level :D

Yes, I have the new MBP 15" and it's great. The only thing I don't like about it is the screen falls down (or BACK -- which is even worse) if you get up really quick or angle it. It's been one of the largest complaints, I believe, with the new MBP. Other than that, it's been completely worth it. :)

Yes, I have the new MBP 15" and it's great. The only thing I don't like about it is the screen falls down (or BACK -- which is even worse) if you get up really quick or angle it. It's been one of the largest complaints, I believe, with the new MBP. Other than that, it's been completely worth it. :)

I haven't noticed this on my unit under regular usage other than if I were to hold the machine at an awkward angle, I believe it's the weight of the display that causes it. Other than that, I find that the hinge is quite good in comparison to the previous MacBook Pro which had too much "bounce" to it, for example if you were to angle the display and let go it would wobble in place for a moment, I'm finding this doesn't happen on the new MacBook Pro.

I freaking love my MacBook, but to be honest, I don't think the 2.4GHz worth it.

MacBook 2.0 $1400

+ 400MHz CPU

+ 90GB HDD

+ Backlit Keyboard

------------------------

MacBook 2.4 $1750 (+$350)

+ 2" Screen with higher Res

+ WAY better screen quality

+ 256MB GeForce 9600GT Dedicated

------------------------

MacBook Pro 2.4 $2150 (+$400)

What I see for this is that you really not give much for your $350 where the MacBook Pro really have something under the hood for that $400.

I recommends you to keep your MacBook and save again few months to get the Pro. Specially that you will get iLife '09 for free and we never know, maybe Snow Leopard or a new MacBook/Pro revision will be out.

It's not like if you are left out with nothing anyway.

my 2.4ghz unibody macbook just arrived in the post this morning. i got it second hand, but its in perfect condition, as new.

its a dream coming from my 2ghz white core duo macbook. youtube no longer causes my fans to switch on!!!

still getting used to the trackpad button though. atm i prefer the old separate button, but im sure i'll come to get used to it.

I've got the 2.0Ghz MacBook (I hate backlit keyboards, and I spent the ?200 on a 500GB HDD and more memory instead), and I absolutely love it.

how is the 4GB memory? Notice a big diff? and is ur 500GB 7200RPM?

how is the 4GB memory? Notice a big diff? and is ur 500GB 7200RPM?

Nope, the 500GB Drive is 5400rpm, however, you do get a bit of a performance increase because if its increased density, however, it's very minimal.

4GB does make things run smoother when doing very intensive stuff (I quite often have photoshop + flash + parallels running - all of which are massive memory hogs), however, in general web browsing/iwork stuff, there's not *that* much difference.

However, you can pick up 4GB of DDR3 and the 500GB HDD for less than ?200 if you shop around, which is cheaper than both the upgrade to 2.4GHz, and Apple's price for upgrading to 4GB ram:pp.

Nope, the 500GB Drive is 5400rpm, however, you do get a bit of a performance increase because if its increased density, however, it's very minimal.

4GB does make things run smoother when doing very intensive stuff (I quite often have photoshop + flash + parallels running - all of which are massive memory hogs), however, in general web browsing/iwork stuff, there's not *that* much difference.

However, you can pick up 4GB of DDR3 and the 500GB HDD for less than ?200 if you shop around, which is cheaper than both the upgrade to 2.4GHz, and Apple's price for upgrading to 4GB ram:pp.

I confirm. Things are faster only when doing intensive stuff.

For instance, I'm running Finder, Dashboard and a couple of widgets Mail, iCal, Webkit, Activity Monitor and usually Preview or Word or PowerPoint.

When I do this on my iMac, it becomes a little sluggish, but not on my MacBook. Especially Spaces becomes really laggy, but never on the MacBook Unibody:))

I confirm. Things are faster only when doing intensive stuff.

For instance, I'm running Finder, Dashboard and a couple of widgets Mail, iCal, Webkit, Activity Monitor and usually Preview or Word or PowerPoint.

When I do this on my iMac, it becomes a little sluggish, but not on my MacBook. Especially Spaces becomes really laggy, but never on the MacBook Unibody :)

you don't wish you had the 2.4GHz backlit keyboard?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!