[BUG] All images saved with MS Paint are not indexed


Recommended Posts

That seems really unlikely.. I just put a test.jpg file in created with mspaint in the pictures folder and its shows up search just fine.

Now I am running sp2 beta.. But I find it unlikely there is a bug that prevents mspaint files from showing up.

Where are you saving them, and what file type? Maybe your index is set not to index that file type or location -- what program used to create it has nothing to do with it.

Not a big fan of the MS indexing in general.. I use locate32 for all my indexing needs. http://www.locate32.net/

I save them in my pictures folders. Only the MS Paint saved images are affected by this bug!

- I save an image (jpg, png, etc.) with MS Paint, I open the folder where I saved it, in the search box I type the name of image but nothing is found.

- I save an image (jpg, png, etc.) with another program (i.e. IE7, Firefox, Paint.NET), I open the folder where I saved it, in the search box I type the name of image and the image is found.

In the same folder I have different images: images saved with MS Paint, images saved with other programs; I can't find the images saved with MS Paint. So there's a bug in MS Paint which prevents the saved images to be indexed.

Edited by jamesVault

The program used to create a file has NOTHING to do with the indexing service indexing it. NOTHING!! It just does not work that way.

Indexing is based on location and file extension.. Does not matter if you create a file with notepad and call it picture.jpg or paint, or gimp or psp or paint.net or download the file with FF or IE, etc.. etc..

You do understand that it can take a bit for files to show up in the index.. They are not instantly added to the index.

If your not happy with the builtin indexing.. use something else.. I would highly recommend locate32 -- but again this does not instantly update your index either. You need to schedule when it updates your index, I have mine set to update every morning around 5 am, etc.

you're wrong. If I save an image using another program I'm able to find it instantly! All images saved with MS Paint are never shown in the search results, never and never! This bug is always reproducible on my system.

I save an image with MS Paint, I open the folder where I saved it, I type its name in the explorer search box... no results!

I save an image with IE7 or Paint.NET or FF, I open the folder where I saved it, I type its name in the explorer search box... found it instantly!

I have a lot of images saved in my pictures since months ago and I notice that the images saved with MS Paint are not shown in the search results; the images saved with other programs appear in the search results.

Edited by jamesVault

WTF does opening the folder have to do with it? If you opening the folder -- what you can not see the file? WTF you have to search the index for?

Well then maybe sp2 fixes it :rolleyes: Since I am not having that issue.

Created file - saved it

post-14624-1231179713_thumb.jpg

Searched for it -- found it.

post-14624-1231179725.jpg

edit: I'll grab my sons laptop here in a bit.. It does not have the beta sp2 installed.. But again what program is used to create the file has NOTHING to do with how its indexed.

But again what program is used to create the file has NOTHING to do with how its indexed.

please listen to me:

I save a new image with MS Paint => no result!

I save a new image with IE7, FF, Paint.NET => I'm able to find it.

So the used program makes the difference! MS Paint has a bug.

Edited by jamesVault
Like BudMan said, it can take a while to index a newly created file.

no, the wait time doesn't matter,

because I have a lot of images saved with MS Paint months ago and they never appear in the search results. And If I save a new image using another program, the newly saved file is instantly shown in the search results.

If I open the folder where I saved them and in the explorer search box I type the name of a file saved with MS Paint, the image will not appear in the results! The filter doesn't show the images saved with MS Paint! The filter works fine when I search for images saved with the other programs.

So, there're 2 issues:

1) start menu search box doesn't show results for images saved with MS Paint (jpg, png, gif, etc)

2) the explorer filter box doesn't filter the images saved with MS Paint (I'm inside a folder contains images saved with MS Paint and images saved with other programs, my images are here, I type the name of a file saved with MS Paint but the filter has no effect i.e. no result for a file saved with MS Paint! The filter works fine on all other images saved with the other programs)

Edited by jamesVault
Due a bug, all images saved with MS Paint are not indexed by Windows Search!

Does SP2 fix this annoying bug?

Are you saving it to your Documents or Pictures folder? By default, Windows will only index your C:\Users folder.

you're wrong.

clearly Budman is horribly wrong.

theres no way someone with 13,000+ posts on a pc support forum and has had years of experience with computers, would know what hes talking about.

also that fact that hes an MVC for helping out so many people.....but nope, your right.....hes wrong cause you said so.

clearly Budman is horribly wrong.

theres no way someone with 13,000+ posts on a pc support forum and has had years of experience with computers, would know what hes talking about.

also that fact that hes an MVC for helping out so many people.....but nope, your right.....hes wrong cause you said so.

Ok, nice logic. :rolleyes:

Something isn't behaving correctly with images saved from Paint.

Observe (111111.jpg was made in Paint, 222222.jpg was made in Gimp).

post-17075-1231214536_thumb.jpg

Not a big fan of the MS indexing in general.. I use locate32 for all my indexing needs. http://www.locate32.net/

Just an FYI, those aren't really comparable things at all. locate32 just searches filenames or dates. There really is little benefit over "dir /s".

Due a bug, all images saved with MS Paint are not indexed by Windows Search!

Does SP2 fix this annoying bug?

Have you installed the Windows Search 4 update? (which is included in SP2, but available on Windows Update right now). It includes improved retry logic for cases where an application may be locking a file immediately after saving to it, preventing the indexer from accessing it.

I did get some strange behaviour*, but the file did show up.

* Basically, I saved a file from Paint called "Untitled.jpg", if I typed "untitled" into the search prompt it showed up, if I typed "untitled.jpg" into the search prompt it didn't. I checked the "index file" flag in the advanced properties, and then I could search for it via name and name + extension.

WTF does opening the folder have to do with it? If you opening the folder -- what you can not see the file? WTF you have to search the index for?

Well then maybe sp2 fixes it :rolleyes: Since I am not having that issue.

Created file - saved it

post-14624-1231179713_thumb.jpg

Searched for it -- found it.

post-14624-1231179725.jpg

edit: I'll grab my sons laptop here in a bit.. It does not have the beta sp2 installed.. But again what program is used to create the file has NOTHING to do with how its indexed.

Budman is the best! He really knows his stuff. He would not steer you in the wrong direction. I have been watching his posts for a long time (years, literally) , and I can tell you, he is the best! You rock, budman! :cool:

Have you installed the Windows Search 4 update?

yes, it has been automatically installed by Windows Update

Something isn't behaving correctly with images saved from Paint.

Observe (111111.jpg was made in Paint, 222222.jpg was made in Gimp).

you're right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You found the cause of this bug: the index property is disabled for all images created with MS Paint. MS Paint has a bug!

Edited by jamesVault

Where is other post about a known bug.. I find it UNLIKELY that the program creating the file has anything to do with it. The application creating a file should have nothing to do with how its indexed.

Please point out this post you say you found stating such.

I find it UNLIKELY that the program creating the file has anything to do with it. The application creating a file should have nothing to do with how its indexed.

I save the images in the same folder using different programs:

- I can't find any images saved with MS Paint (no results from start menu search box, no results from the folder search box!!!)

- I can find any images saved with all other programs

- all images saved with MS Paint have NOT the index attribute

- all images saved with all other programs have the index attribute

MS Paint has a bug!

Edited by jamesVault

Ok I found this thread.

http://forum.soft32.com/windows/BUG-images...pict362630.html

And are you talking about this comments.

---

Michael wrote:

> The 'index this file' is not checked in the properties.

> Basic bug seems to be that the save does not inherit the properties

> from the parent directory.

Back in July, Dave Woods from Microsoft confirmed in teh newsgroup thatt

this is a known bug in Vista. You'll probably find that thread in the

archives, somewhere.

---

Well I save and I saved as.. And the index this file for faster searching property is set eitherway.

But sure if the file does not have the index this file property set, then no it should not show up in your index.

I would love to see this MS posting they mention that confirms this bug.

This should of been one of the first things you checked.. I wold of assumed you had gone over this article.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932989

You cannot find files when you search a Windows Vista-based computer even though the files exist on the computer

When you search the index, you experience the symptoms in the "Symptoms" section if any one of the following conditions is true:

* The file is not in an indexed location.

* The file type of the file is not indexed.

* The file has properties that prevent it from being indexed.

* The indexer has not yet inserted the file into the index.

* The indexer is overlooking the file.

* The items in the search results do not match the file that you are searching for.

Works fine here. I started MSPaint, went to File>Save As... and entered a file name. It saved in Pictures folder and I immediately went to the start menu and typed the file name. It showed up at the top of the list as expected. It is NOT, however, flagged with the "Index this file for faster searching" box.

http://www.winvistatips.com/showpost.php?p...amp;postcount=6

Post by the MS guy confirming that at a bare minimum they have a bug report about it and are investigating it.

Edit: Yeah, files saved by paint here don't have the indexing flag set.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!