[BUG] All images saved with MS Paint are not indexed


Recommended Posts

The default state for the attribute is to allow indexing. It has to explicitly be set (the attribute is called the FANCI bit, for File Attribute No Content Indexing). It was designed to be used for temporary files and such. If there was a bug in that Paint was setting this, I have not been able to reproduce it on my Win7 beta machine, so likely it has been fixed in 7.

If that attribute was getting set, it would stop the file from being indexed on Vista (on Win7 I believe it would still get indexed, as I seem to remember that the behavior was changed to allow file properties to be indexed, just not the full text contents).

Dave Wood works on my team, though over on the indexer side of things. I can follow up with him and see what he knows of this bug, and if it was a Paint issue that was fixed along the way somewhere.

I can confirm this is true using my awesome clipping tool abilities. I made the 111111 file in paint, then made the 222 file in paint and checked the index flag in the properties. 11111 doesn't show up in the search and 222 does instantly, even after 1 day of waiting.

MS paint in vista SP1 is not setting the index flag on new files.

post-91070-1231334829_thumb.jpg

post-91070-1231335017_thumb.jpg

Well I just did some testing on my sons vista sp1 box, and sure enough the index this file is not set.

But I again I have to ask -- Who and the F uses mspaint? ;)

Is this a bug in mspaint, or something else where that bit is not being set, or being unset. You sure mspaint is the only application doing it?

Brandon is our best hope for getting to the bottom of this.. since I can not seem to find any solid info.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!