• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2009


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

627 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Auslogic
      57
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      77
    • JKDefrag
      72
    • Norton Speed Disk
      0
    • O&O Defrag
      71
    • PageDefrag
      1
    • PerfectDisk
      171
    • Vopt
      6
    • Windows Defrag
      102
    • Other (please specify below)
      68


Question

An updated "Best Defragmenter" poll for 2009. Please use this as a reference when researching Defrag utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Happy Voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/717868-definitive-best-defragmenter-2009/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm a command line kinda guy; so I use Sysinternals Contig most of them time. It can defragment individual files or whole drives, be scheduled to run automatically (no longer necessary in Vista), or be run from a script. I think that it just invokes the default Windows Defragmenter though.

  • 0

I rather like Auslogics Disk Defrag; its fast and simple. I might have to take a look at PerfectDisk though...

Edit: nevermind, not for the $30 they charge for PerfectDisk. I'd like to see what it has to offer to be worth it... Is it really *that* much better?

Edited by 2Cold Scorpio
  • 0
An updated "Best Defragmenter" poll for 2009. Please use this as a reference when researching Defrag utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Happy Voting!

It would be better if this poll had reviews for each of the defrag applications....

  • 0

Still using JkDefrag for a number of reasons.

1) Invokes the Windows API so it's as safe as houses.

2) There is a 64 bit version.

3) Can set up daily, weekly and monthly routines. I even have one I run when installing/uninstalling stuff.

4) Command line mode works great when invoked by Task Manager.

5) It's free.

6) It's small.

7) No Spyware/Adware/Links.

Some drawbacks for the sake of balance.

1) Need to learn the switches to make proper use of it.

  • 0

I've switched to the newest version of Auslogics, for one reason:

post-57213-1242859759_thumb.png

I have some large files on my drive which get fragmented often (VirtualBox drives), and this option makes defragmenting so much faster.

  • 0
I rather like Auslogics Disk Defrag; its fast and simple. I might have to take a look at PerfectDisk though...

Edit: nevermind, not for the $30 they charge for PerfectDisk. I'd like to see what it has to offer to be worth it... Is it really *that* much better?

I would say so. Its the only defrag software that had actually made me feel faster - the difference was noticeable. Its algorithm is super..don't know what it does, but windows explorer becomes super responsive - folders with hundreds of pictures and videos also open up instantly.

  • 0
I would say so. Its the only defrag software that had actually made me feel faster - the difference was noticeable. Its algorithm is super..don't know what it does, but windows explorer becomes super responsive - folders with hundreds of pictures and videos also open up instantly.

how is it compared to jkdefrag?

  • 0

I didn't find any noticeable diff with JKDefrag. Its a pretty limited software. It can't defrag half the files. Doesn't support MFT optimisations and boottime defrag. Also moves large files to the end of the hd. Don't want this, since they can be data files used by games. Its placement logic is flawed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!