Sony to slay "sacred cows" for cost-cuttings?


Recommended Posts

UK newspaper The Times reports today that radical corporate upheaval is coming to Sony.

Long-overdue cost-cutting moves will, according to company sources, result in "sacred cow-slaying measures" that will "will abolish or fundamentally alter many of Sony's long-established business practices."

The reorganization will likely be made public following CES in Las Vegas. The massive trade show ends on January 11th.

Could the PlayStation hardware business get the chop?

That's hard to say, but the PS3 has been bleeding money since it launched in November, 2006 and the PSP is struggling as well. One ominous sign: there is talk of a shift that would turn Sony from a manufacturing to a content-driven business model.

PS3 manufacturing costs have generated huge losses for Sony over the past two years. Content would include games, of course, but Sony also has a stake in movies and music. If the company judges its console business as too costly to continue, it could decide to pursue a system-agnostic approach like the one adopted by Sega after it abandoned the Dreamcast in 2001. Ironically, back then it was Sony's PlayStation 2 which steamrolled the well-regared Sega console.

Alternately, the PlayStation business might be salvaged in whole or in part and manufacturing cuts could be made on the consumer electronics side of Sony's house.

In any case, we should know more next week. In the meantime, PlayStation 3 fanboys may suffer a few sleepless nights as they worry about the future of their system.

Sauce: http://www.gamepolitics.com/2009/01/05/quo...tation-jeopardy & http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/busi...icle5446963.ece

Not sure how valid this is since I'm pretty sure the PS3's just started making Sony some decent profits recently as opposed to losses?

Sony have already denied any more cuts

Sony Denies Report of Further Restructuring

Sony(SNE Quote - Cramer on SNE - Stock Picks) said it has no plans to announce additional restructuring actions, denying a report that says the company plans a big corporate upheaval that could see job cuts and sweeping changes to management and manufacturing processes.

Company sources told the Times of London that operations across the electronics company are braced for a series of "sacred cow-slaying" measures that they believe will abolish or fundamentally alter many of Sony's long-established business practices.

The report said the restructuring at Sony is likely to be announced after the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January. Most of the changes will occur at Sony's domestic Japanese operations in the form of factory closings and the abolition of several major divisions.

However, Bloomberg reports Monday that Sony has no plans to announce any additional reorganization beyond the job cuts and plant closures it unveiled in December.

"We announced the restructuring of the electronics business last month," said Sony spokesman Atsuo Omagari, Bloomberg reports. "We are not planning to announce further restructuring at this time."

Source: http://www.thestreet.com/story/10455917/1/...cm_ven=GOOGLEFI

This console wars crap is really starting to grate my nerves.

Oh look, MS are rumoured to be cutting 17% of staff, better somehow relate that to the 360 and post it on a gaming website.

Oh look, MS are rumoured to be cutting 17% of staff, better somehow relate that to the 360 and post it on a gaming website.

lol.

i guess some people don't realize that sony does sell other products other than the playstation.

just seems silly to me.

One of the articles that I read about Sony today said that they are losing money on their TVs too, which surprised me. I don't think Sony are about to pull out of either TVs or Playstation, but if the basis for this supposed "pulling out" was to be losses alone, then Sony might as well just give up altogether.

Edit: Was in the Reuters article on it.

One of the articles that I read about Sony today said that they are losing money on their TVs too, which surprised me. I don't think Sony are about to pull out of either TVs or Playstation, but if the basis for this supposed "pulling out" was to be losses alone, then Sony might as well just give up altogether.

Edit: Was in the Reuters article on it.

They'll be losing revenue in the TV industry (compared to previous months/years) due to sales dipping from the credit crunch (TVs are a large investment), but they won't be losing money on their TVs in terms of how they lose it on the PS3.

TV manufacturing prices haven't suddenly shot up over the last few months or anything.

All of these remarks are valid studies of what the crunch is doing to corporations, but the irrational grabbing at assumptions like

Could the PlayStation hardware business get the chop?

and/or everyone thinking Sony will pull the plug on their gaming division are just silly.

If anything was to be plugged, it would be things like the walkman which has practically no marketshare (Sony keeping it going for historic reasons).

The gaming division will be one of the biggest profit earners in the long run and always has been. It's the PS3 that has massacred revenue right now, not the actual gaming division as a whole - The PS2 and PSP are happily raking in profits, as well as software sold.

Profits are higher than losses also for said division, as each fiscal year the overall loss has decreased.

New gaming hardware always does that though at the start, it's heavier hitting for Sony this generation due to Blu Ray going into the PS3, but the upside of that was always going to be winning the HD war which benefits Sony movie studios/hardware tied to Blu Ray.

We're probably going to see more lost jobs/cost cutting measures, but like I said above it drives me nuts when gaming websites take these articles and somehow try to impose doom on consoles to incite console wars.

Such prestigious and important pieces of hardware such as the consoles and gaming divisions themselves won't be going anywhere for neither MS or Sony (both seemingly having to cut jobs and cost cut). Nintendo is still printing money though :p

Apparently these are earnings figures for the divisions

	  Sony			Nintendo		 Microsoft		   Industry
Y/E 1998	 $902,811,090   $1,023,333,867					  $1,926,144,957
Y/E 1999   $1,102,563,557   $1,301,350,000					  $2,403,913,557
Y/E 2000	 $722,738,949   $1,368,207,547					  $2,090,946,497
Y/E 2001	-$449,776,290	 $677,576,000						$227,799,710
Y/E 2002	 $629,101,056	 $895,872,180   -$1,135,000,000	  $389,973,237
Y/E 2003	 $935,569,253	 $834,333,333   -$1,191,000,000	  $578,902,586
Y/E 2004	 $627,195,212	 $993,161,303   -$1,337,000,000	  $283,356,515
Y/E 2005	 $419,888,799   $1,056,056,202	 -$539,000,000	  $936,945,001
Y/E 2006	  $69,129,058	 $774,478,055   -$1,339,000,000	 -$495,392,887
Y/E 2007  -$1,970,923,859   $1,914,666,388   -$1,969,000,000   -$2,025,257,471
Y/E 2008  -$1,079,994,103   $4,322,637,887	  $426,000,000	$3,668,643,783

Y/E 09Q1	  $51,113,208   $1,124,452,830	  $178,000,000	$1,353,566,038
Y/E 09Q2	-$379,471,154   $1,278,759,615		

Total				
	   $1,579,944,775  $17,564,885,209   -$6,906,000,000   $11,339,541,523

Full Year Average
		 $173,482,066   $1,378,333,888   -$1,012,000,000	  $907,815,953

Profitable Years				
			8		11		   1			 9

Non Profitable Years				
			3		 0		   6			 2

Average in Loss Year				
	  -$1,166,898,084		   N/A   -$1,251,666,667   -$1,260,325,179

Average in Profit Year				
		 $676,124,622   $1,378,333,888	  $426,000,000	$1,389,625,094

gamefinance.png

Source: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php...42#post13448142

That's just to show, while there is losses, these divisions are very profitable, amongst all the other brand benefits of being involved in gaming.

well audioboxer , we need to realize the reality here, there are more Anti ps3 ppl among vocal gamers (vocally on internets) than Anti Xbox users (even when it massively fails and slams lots of proprietary stuff and goes anti-linux)

specially the guys in USA are very anti ps3, even check the board here, many anti ps3 posts and posters are allowed even when they are openly trolling even if they label it as open discussion.

I think we need to get thick skinned and get used to this "Death to PS3" chants we will keep hearing.

well audioboxer , we need to realize the reality here, there are more Anti ps3 ppl among vocal gamers (vocally on internets) than Anti Xbox users (even when it massively fails and slams lots of proprietary stuff and goes anti-linux)

specially the guys in USA are very anti ps3, even check the board here, many anti ps3 posts and posters are allowed even when they are openly trolling even if they label it as open discussion.

I think we need to get thick skinned and get used to this "Death to PS3" chants we will keep hearing.

I've always seen it as the other way around, it seems like the Sony crowd has nothing but hatred for Microsoft and the xbox whereas the 360 crowd is just indifferent. Regardless, I'd hate to see anything happen to either console. While everyone yells about who will win the console war the real winner is always the consumer.

The PS3 will breakeven in 2009, and with proper cost-cutting Sony could even turn a profit on the PS3 near the end of 2009. Add to the the fact that the PS2 and PSP are both MAKING Sony money and i see no reason for Sony to cut the PlayStation division. I don't think it's even been considered, honestly.

For a second there I thought they were literally going to slay sacred cows to advertise a game (like what they did with that poor goat). I was thinking "Well, that won't go down well with the Indian audience" :laugh:

LOL I thought along similar lines.

I was like how will slaying cows save costs? Unless sony now owns a farm or something and they plan to enter the meat industry.

Sony Beef

Like.No.Other

LOL I thought along similar lines.

I was like how will slaying cows save costs? Unless sony now owns a farm or something and they plan to enter the meat industry.

Sony Beef

Like.No.Other

Live in your world, eat in ours?

Don't underestimate the taste of the beef?

This is eating?

:rofl:

LOL I thought along similar lines.

I was like how will slaying cows save costs? Unless sony now owns a farm or something and they plan to enter the meat industry.

Sony Beef

Like.No.Other

:D

nah i prefer

MS chicken crispy !, ms buyed out 90% of KFC in year 2050

much better haha

:rofl:

the title is a bit wiard anyway

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!