Windows Live Photo Gallery 2009: DB keeps corrupting


Recommended Posts

Every few minutes I'm using Windows Live Photo Gallery 2009 it crashes with:

45657071jd9.jpg

It can be fine for awhile but it then suddenly crashes. I only installed it about an hour ago (upgrading from v2008). I've tried running a Repair from Programs and Features. Each time it crashes/gets corrupt if I follow these instructions:

1. Type %userprofile%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows Live Photo Gallery in the Start Search box, and then press ENTER.

2. Right-click Pictures.pd4, and then select Rename.

3. Change the name of file to OLD_Pictures.pd4.

4. Start Windows Live Photo Gallery.

And it's fine for awhile before it crashes again. If I don't great a new DB when I go back into Windows Live Photo Gallery 2009 it immediately gives the error above.

Thanks

p.s - Source: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/944221/en-us

Interestingly when it is corrupted and I open a JPG from Windows Explorer it doesn't crash with that window left minimized. It seems to only crash when the main program is open.

It also takes ages to load, saying "Loading". Windows Live Photo Gallery 2008 opened almost instantly.

Edited by bradavon

I've just spent ages uninstalling, removing all Windows Live folders and registry entries, reinstalling Windows Live Essentials 2009 Wave 3 to find it's still crashing in exactly the same way.

If I cannot fix it over the next few days I'll have to go back to Windows Live Essentials 2008 Wave 2. That works fine. I like the new Favourites feature in WLM and the People Tagging in WLPG is decent but not enough to have it crash on me. It's also got really bloated. It's well over 150Mb, why on earth does it need to be this big? And install so many extra components?

The fact it takes ages to open is annoying enough to go back. I'll wait until the next version is released or when Windows 7 comes. Windows Live Essentials 2008 Wave 2 is already decent.

I wonder if I can run Windows Live Messenger 2009 and Windows Live Photo Gallery 2008.

Are you using Vista or Windows 7? WLPG used to be fine for me, but I got Windows 7 and installed the latest Wave 3, and it keeps crashing whenever I'm browsing my (massive) library of photos on a wireless NAS.

I don't know what to do, it just keeps crashing.

Vista HP SP1 32-Bit and mine crashes browsing locally.

My collection consists of 16,576 files and 531 folders. Coming to 51.5Gb. I know it doesn't like at least one of my MPEGs (it asked if I wanted to ignore it as it had trouble reading it). I'd prefer it didn't look at videos at all but I don't think you can tell it what to check.

How big is your collection? I was wondering if that's what it is. I'm probably going to go back to 2008/Wave 2 today. Even if it doesn't crash it still takes too long to open.

I'm hoping I can uninstall, install Photo Gallery 2008/Wave 2 and then the 2009/Wave 3 MSI files for Windows Live Messenger. I have them saved from the Cache folder.

Have you tried 2008/Wave 2 on Windows 7? I'm at a loss how to fix it too.

I think it is the size of our libraries. The crash dump for mine mentions thumbcache.dll, and I'm thinking it crashes more when I open a folder with a lot of files.

I reckon you're right. It seems to crash most when I'm working on large selections (namely adding people tags).

Let me know if you're successful with Wave 2.

I'm sure that will be fine. I ran it from when it was released (November 2007) until the other day and it didn't crash once. Thankfully there isn't a huge difference between Wave 2 and Wave 3 (from what I can see). It doesn't have "people tagging" but I'm pretty sure you can still tag people, so it's no real loss. It definitely opens much quicker and has none of this "Loading" rubbish.

All the Live components have grown loads since Wave 2, all that background stuff (like Application Error Control and SQL) aren't in Wave 2. I bet all that isn't helping matters.

More work seems to have been done on Windows Live Messenger than Photo Gallery. I don't run any of the other Wave 3 components, except Office Outlook Connector (which isn't really a Live component). Hopefully you can mix Wave 2 and 3 applications. Unless I can find a fix by tomorrow night I'll go back to Wave 2. I'll post again then.

It's still crashing in the same way, so I've gone back to Windows Live Photo Gallery 2008 (Wave 2). WOW it opens so much quicker. Here's what I did:

1. Uninstalled Wave 3

2. Ran the Wave 2 Installer and just installed Live Photo Gallery

3. Ran the following MSI files to install Windows Live Messenger 2009 (Wave 3):

Messenger.msi - Main program

Contacts.msi - Windows Live Communications Platform - You cannot login without it

This link: http://messengergeek.spaces.live.com/Blog/...try?sa=22717258

Says you also need to install:

dw20shared.msi - Application Error Reporting

crt.msi - Visual Studio Runtime

SegoeFont.msi - Segoe UI Font - Not required on Vista

But I've not bothered and it works fine.

Taking this approach means Windows Live Messenger doesn't appear in Programs and Feature/Add-Remove. To uninstall the components:

1. Right click on each MSI

2. Click on "Uninstall"

If you run "WLXSuite.msi" (WL Essentials Installer MSI) it appears in Programs and Features but when run doesn't do anything, not in my experience anyway.

The MSI files are in:

Wave 3: C:\Program Files\Common Files\Windows Live\.cache

Wave 2: C:\Program Files\Common Files\WindowsLiveInstaller\MsiSources

Edited by bradavon

This will do for now until Microsoft fix the bugs in Wave 3 Live Photo Gallery or I get Windows 7 and try again. I'm in no particular rush, Live Photo Gallery 2008 works much better.

It even has tagging, although it is more basic than 2009.

Same problem here running Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit and the latest WL Essentials. My WLPG would crash soon After I added the photos folder on my Windows Home Server.

Disabling "face detection" in >File>Options seems to have fixed the problem for me.

Hope this works for others as well.

post-265920-1232079109_thumb.png

Hello

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this and found it helped but for me it still crashed :(. I'm not sure what that does as it still recognised faces when disabled. Windows Live Photo Gallery 2008 works perfectly. I'll stick with that for now.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
My Live Photo 2009 is also crashing on Windows 7 and referencing thumbcache. I tried disabling the face recognition, but that doesn't work. I'm not sure if it matters, but my photos on are windows home server, and there are over 30gb of photos.

Just checking back here on this post. With the latest forced update my WLPG reverted to crashing again and no disabling of face detection or other features helps, so I'm between a rock and a hard place since I really don't want to go through the hassle of uninstalling/installing a hybrid configuration of live applications.

Yes, I too have all of my photos on WHS, so that definitely is the key.

Wish someone at Live would help us out here.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!