Ways to enable the XP standard "Start menu" (not Classic)


Recommended Posts

In a domain? I dont think you can have it in a domain env. You can use the themes if not locked by group policy but when you add a system to a domain it forces the classic/visualstyled classic menu.

Assumed it was a domain due to it being in Windows NT4/2000/XP Client section, ignore if not in a domain.

It absolutely does NOT.

I wasnt sure hence saying "think" but hey ho whatever floats your boat mate. Nice helpful post btw you must be so proud, the original poster is also grateful for your valuable contribution to his question.

I stand corrected by joel......but unlike him Ill provide you with something thats of value to what you asked (and loosely relevant).

You need to go to User Config > Admin Templates > Start Menu and Taskbar

There is a policy here called "Force Classic Start Menu" It should be Not Configured or set to Disabled so you can use the new XP Start Menu.

Of course this is only "loosely" relevant to the question if it is in a domain profile you are seeing this with (and of course if there is no GPOs set on the server for domain clients configuration or physical appearance).

(perhaps I should have added 4 words and added to my post count....oh wait no im too grown up to give a chuff)

Edited by Mando
I wasnt sure hence saying "think" but hey ho whatever floats your boat mate. Nice helpful post btw you must be so proud, the original poster is also grateful for your valuable contribution to his question.

I stand corrected by joel......but unlike him Ill provide you with something thats of value to what you asked (and loosely relevant).

You need to go to User Config > Admin Templates > Start Menu and Taskbar

There is a policy here called "Force Classic Start Menu" It should be Not Configured or set to Disabled so you can use the new XP Start Menu.

Of course this is only "loosely" relevant to the question if it is in a domain profile you are seeing this with (and of course if there is no GPOs set on the server for domain clients configuration or physical appearance).

(perhaps I should have added 4 words and added to my post count....oh wait no im too grown up to give a chuff)

You said 'think' to the themes, not the XP start menu. Maybe you meant to say otherwise, but your grammar didn't follow your thought.

You're assuming he's in a domain, but those settings could be made on a local policy also. And he said 'enable', not 'that setting I can get to by right-clicking doesn't work, how can I be blocked?'. There is a difference. We have very little information to go on, but you're upset that I corrected your post.

My correction was entirely relevant to the extreme misinformation you posted. I didn't just spout off about something unrelated, like you're trying to make it sound. Since you don't 'give a chuff', I'm sure we won't hear from you again on this matter.

Im not upset, its a forum post for goodness sake, but perhaps a bit of civility in your first reply would have been a thought (especially with you having a respected and worthwhile position in the forums, leading by example) or requesting more information which in hindsight perhaps I should have done myself.

I assumed he was in a domain because its posted in the XP client section and if it was categorised incorrectly it would have been moved no? Id think that was a fairly reasonable and fair assumption to make is it not?

Anyways to O.P Could you clarify what you are trying to do and whether its in a domain env or a local workgroup/stand alone capacity please.

Im not upset, its a forum post for goodness sake, but perhaps a bit of civility in your first reply would have been a thought.

Explain to me how it was uncivil. I didn't call you a name, and I didn't question your intelligence. I just refuted what you said.

Explain to me how it was uncivil. I didn't call you a name, and I didn't question your intelligence. I just refuted what you said.

....and thats ALL you did. You didn't provide any info to correct or clarify why he was wrong. When he argued back, THEN you provided some comments that explained why he was wrong. I think his point is you should of probably provided some details in your 1st post, instead of saying NOPE YOUR'RE WRONG and leaving it at that.

Not trying to have a stab at you Joel, you post many useful posts and responses, but yeah you were a bit short/ blunt in your initial response.

....and thats ALL you did. You didn't provide any info to correct or clarify why he was wrong.

WHY he was wrong? How about, because it's irrefutably wrong? There's no question of an explanation, it's just not correct. The correct answer therefore is the opposite of what he said, basically that Classic mode is NOT forced. Does this really need to be explained?

XP is built on BSD and it's interface was developed by a llama in a basement in Bangladesh. Every month, Microsoft secretly scans your entire PC and downloads any file with certain keywords to a central server in China, and using a new form of compression, fits it all on a 1TB drive, from every computer worldwide. I'm right.

Are you now going to post a long explanation of where I went wrong, or can you point me to a search engine by simply saying, "That's not correct."?

Are you all women here? You hear tones of voice in posts now? :blink:

Are you all women here? You hear tones of voice in posts now? blink.gif

nice sexist remark mate well done. Good to see you hold ladies in such high regard and a sweeping generalisation to the fairer sex). Says it all quite nicely imo. Maybe try the racist card next and we got a full house! (Im not even gonna go near you questioning our sexuality or our gender)

It absolutely does NOT.

^ Didnt realise there was an encoded message that says google search and you will see you are incorrect. How ignorant and stupid of me.

lets just drop it all now please and get back to the original posters request, this will just keep going on and on and on and on and on.............

Oh and it was an Alpaca btw not a LLama (they wouldnt be seen dead touching a windows UI) :o )

Peace out!

6 Years on Neowin and never a tiff (and 0% warn rating which im proud of), I dont want to start now

Edited by Joel
fixed quote tag
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!