[Official] Dexter Season 4


Recommended Posts

Interesting about Anton. Never thought of it that way but I think its starting to make more sense instead of Trinity.

I'm starting to think Dex is going to hold back on killing Trinity until EP 11 or 12. He's going to try to befriend him to leach as much information out of him as he can. He did the same thing in S01, S02 and more memorably with Miguel. He'd been using Miguel's own lines with Rita. And now he's using Trinity's when he's in therapy. He talks about himself being the lone wolf who has to hide and survive. He's only going to learn from others. So I think he's going to leave Trinity be for a while.

^ Agreed. I still think he will have to kill him as he kills innocents. Just because he has his reasons doesn't make it acceptable. Notice how Dexter hasn't fallen back on Harry's advice. No visions. That episode was relieving even for me :) It was nice to see him find a way to keep his secret out in the open. Bitchy Rita was getting on my nerves. I really like watching him interact with Trinity. Similar to how his brother acted around him in Season 1. I wonder if Debra finds out about Dexter's mother. I'm guessing Harry slept with several of them so she might give up early. Or if she even finds out it was Anton. After the last episode I'm completely convinced it wasn't Trinity who shot them. His ritual is even more deep than Dexter's. He wouldn't impulsively kill him.

If Anton shot Deb and killed Lundy, does this mean Dex will have to kill Anton? I'd hate to work for that show. Great paychecks .... until you disappear! Would suck to get fired.

I doubt that the paycheques are that great either, since it a Showtime production. Well atleast the mortality rate is nowhere near as ridiculous as in 24.

It's interesting :\ I didn't think Trinity killed Lundy even when they first said it. I believed it was Anton, I'm not sure though. It might not have been Anton. How would he know that she would survive? She was pretty messed up wasn't she?

I'm getting really sick of Rita though >.< every time she appears it's like Oh no, she just never shuts up and she has a really irritating voice :p

It doesn't fit for it to be anyone but Anton. Quinn has no reason to do so, Trinity the same. Anton is the only one with a reason. Jealously. If it isn't than it's someone I would have never expected.

it's Doakes :shifty:

So Dexter doesn't kill Trinity with the axe I'm guessing since that red was just the paint on the axe, not blood. I can't say I blame Dex for keeping him alive since he can learn so much from him.

I'm really starting to like John Lithgow's performance more and more, seeing the two dynamics to his character.

So Dexter doesn't kill Trinity with the axe I'm guessing since that red was just the paint on the axe, not blood. I can't say I blame Dex for keeping him alive since he can learn so much from him.

I'm really starting to like John Lithgow's performance more and more, seeing the two dynamics to his character.

Not to mention Dex doesn't kill anyone that's not wrapped in plastic.

I think Dex's new hideout is just waiting to be broken into...probably not this season, but it's begging to expose him.

-Spenser

I never really thought Anton shot Deb/Lundy but I certainly don't think its Trinity

Why not? I mean, he clearly was aware of who Lundy was and even got to see him face to face, hovering around his next kill spot. If anything, having a hotshot serial killer detective hanging around the place where you plan to make your next move would certainly be disastrous.

Lundy was an obstacle. Considering that Trinity's a "family man", he cannot risk having his identity exposed, for his own sake and his family's especially. I don't think he ever meant to really hit Debra, so his lack of concern for seeing to it that she was dead seems fitting. Besides, he probably wasn't even aware that Debra was a cop anyway, considering he only knew about Lundy when he saw his face sitting in the paper. Didn't he rob Lundy as well? A sloppy murder and robbery certainly covers the trail well, hiding any trace of a professional or someone with a real motive beyond cash.

I don't really see Anton being that passionate towards Debra either, much less someone able to hold up such an incredible poker face when he goes to see her in the hospital. Besides, she's already had one murderous boyfriend. Two would just seem overkill.

Why not? I mean, he clearly was aware of who Lundy was and even got to see him face to face, hovering around his next kill spot. If anything, having a hotshot serial killer detective hanging around the place where you plan to make your next move would certainly be disastrous.

Lundy was an obstacle. Considering that Trinity's a "family man", he cannot risk having his identity exposed, for his own sake and his family's especially. I don't think he ever meant to really hit Debra, so his lack of concern for seeing to it that she was dead seems fitting. Besides, he probably wasn't even aware that Debra was a cop anyway, considering he only knew about Lundy when he saw his face sitting in the paper. Didn't he rob Lundy as well? A sloppy murder and robbery certainly covers the trail well, hiding any trace of a professional or someone with a real motive beyond cash.

I don't really see Anton being that passionate towards Debra either, much less someone able to hold up such an incredible poker face when he goes to see her in the hospital. Besides, she's already had one murderous boyfriend. Two would just seem overkill.

just seemed obvious and the great thing about this show is the obvious never happens

just seemed obvious and the great thing about this show is the obvious never happens

Right, and Trinity going out of his way beyond his "ritual" to gun down an obstacle really strikes me, as he isn't bound by any sense of morality like Dexter is, despite how much they both have in common. There aren't any rules for him at all, so long as he and his family are protected. That certainly makes him all the more dangerous as an opponent, and even less predictable I would argue.

"Dexter" is becoming Showtime's "True Blood."

Like HBO's dark hit this summer, "Dexter" keeps growing with nearly each episode, hitting another series high Sunday night -- 1.9 million viewers for its first airing.

The series has gained more than 600,000 viewers over the past three weeks. Compare that to Sunday's "Mad Men" (which matched its season average of 1.8 million) and AMC has roughly quadruple the potential audience over Showtime.

thr

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!