aniv's i7 build + Second i7 Build :D


Recommended Posts

Price?

(I mean total price)

I think the PSU is a overkill IMO.

Its updated in the first post, u just need to add it up. I dont like adding it up.

Thanks Grim :D

DdStriker,

Yea that cpu is cooled by Liquid Nitrogen, I am not doing that lol.

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick Update : Almost a month after the build, rock stable. No BSOD etc *knock on wood*

if you need me to benchmark some games in particular do let me know ;) Don't as me to Benchmark games like Solitaire, Chesss, Sims etc lol.. you get the drift right?

Haven't tried any OC' yet :D However next week I am gonna try that and see how the PWM's react; May get the EVGA Classified just for the digital PWM's.

Yeah thats a sick build bro. I just got hd4850 X2 and I think I over killed it but SLI GTX295, lol. Power to you!

Yeah someone asked in the previous post, what's GTA IV like with this setup? I bet it doesnt go over 50 frames when is maxed out.

Rokstar claims they madetheir game to be maxed out with future hardware.

You should send the benchies to Rockstar and tell them to update their game. If this sytem is not a future hardware system than I dont know what it is....

Cheers

@ Aniv:

I'd be interested in hearing how that v8 is working out for you. I am building a new PC with a Phenom II X4 940 QC and am debating between the v8 and a cooler from Noctua. It's stock 3.0Ghz but I may want to bump that up to around 3.3Ghz. Would be interested to hear your overall thoughts about it thus far.

Kick-ass setup you got there, by the way. I'm inspired. =)

Also, apparently, I cannot edit my post any longer. Can you give some temperatures to go along with that? Idle/Load, and whatnot? From a fresh cool boot to a few hours of use? The more specifics, the better. Would be awesome of you. =)

I imagine the Phenom II X4 940 runs cooler than the i7 so it'd be interesting to see what temps you're getting.

Edited by ~ Rogue ~
@ Aniv:

I'd be interested in hearing how that v8 is working out for you. I am building a new PC with a Phenom II X4 940 QC and am debating between the v8 and a cooler from Noctua. It's stock 3.0Ghz but I may want to bump that up to around 3.3Ghz. Would be interested to hear your overall thoughts about it thus far.

Kick-ass setup you got there, by the way. I'm inspired. =)

Rogue,

Sorry it too so long to get back to you. I hadn't checked my PM since ages. Well if you are gonna OC @ some point I would suggest go with the Noctua or Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme 1366 RT. The V8 is great if you are running stock though.

I will post some temps tonight, both idle and after 2 3 hours of gaming ;)

Rogue,

Sorry it too so long to get back to you. I hadn't checked my PM since ages. Well if you are gonna OC @ some point I would suggest go with the Noctua or Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme 1366 RT. The V8 is great if you are running stock though.

I will post some temps tonight, both idle and after 2 3 hours of gaming ;)

No problem, buddy. I'm looking forward to the results.

Hey Rogue, I went with the Thermaltake V1 Max-Performance CPU Cooler, and I have been really happy with it. My rig is really quiet. I actually hear the Raptors now over the fans.... Love it.

Rogue,

Here are the results (Ambient Room Temp 77 deg. F)

Idle:

Sensor Properties:

Sensor Type Fintek F71882F (ISA 290h)

GPU Sensor Type Analog Devices ADT7473, Volterra VT1165 (NV-I2C 2Eh, 70h)

Motherboard Name EVGA E758

Temperatures:

Motherboard 33 ?C (91 ?F)

CPU 25 ?C (77 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #1 39 ?C (102 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #2 39 ?C (102 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #3 37 ?C (99 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #4 37 ?C (99 ?F)

North Bridge 25 ?C (77 ?F)

VRM 53 ?C (127 ?F)

GPU1: GPU 50 ?C (122 ?F)

GPU1: GPU Ambient 43 ?C (109 ?F)

GPU1: GPU VRM 41 ?C (106 ?F)

GPU2: GPU 48 ?C (118 ?F)

GPU2: GPU Memory 40 ?C (104 ?F)

GPU2: GPU Ambient 42 ?C (108 ?F)

GPU2: GPU VRM 38 ?C (100 ?F)

GPU3: GPU 49 ?C (120 ?F)

GPU3: GPU Ambient 46 ?C (115 ?F)

GPU3: GPU VRM 39 ?C (102 ?F)

GPU4: GPU 47 ?C (117 ?F)

GPU4: GPU Memory 39 ?C (102 ?F)

GPU4: GPU Ambient 40 ?C (104 ?F)

GPU4: GPU VRM 37 ?C (99 ?F)

WDC WD1500AHFD-00RAR1 28 ?C (82 ?F)

Cooling Fans:

CPU 2013 RPM

North Bridge 4702 RPM

GPU2 1993 RPM (41%)

GPU4 1994 RPM (41%)

Voltage Values:

CPU Core 1.28 V

+3.3 V 3.14 V

+5 V 5.00 V

+12 V 12.04 V

+3.3 V Standby 3.06 V

VBAT Battery 3.06 V

CPU VTT 1.34 V

North Bridge Core 1.10 V

DIMM 1.68 V

GPU1: GPU VRM 1.04 V

GPU2: GPU Vcc 3.27 V

GPU2: GPU VRM 1.04 V

GPU3: GPU VRM 1.04 V

GPU4: GPU Vcc 3.28 V

GPU4: GPU VRM 1.04 V

Current Values:

GPU1: GPU VRM 2.18 A

GPU2: GPU VRM 5.81 A

GPU3: GPU VRM 2.90 A

GPU4: GPU VRM 1.45 A

Debug Info F 02E9 0FFF 0FFF 013F

Debug Info T 25 53 33

Debug Info V C4 6D 8F 87 6F 77 A3 BF BF

Debug Info I 03 04 10 19 34 (0541)

After Playing COD WAW @ max settings for 2.5 hours

Sensor Properties:

Sensor Type Fintek F71882F (ISA 290h)

GPU Sensor Type Analog Devices ADT7473, Volterra VT1165 (NV-I2C 2Eh, 70h)

Motherboard Name EVGA E758

Temperatures:

Motherboard 48 ?C (118 ?F)

CPU 35 ?C (95 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #1 49 ?C (120 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #2 49 ?C (120 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #3 47 ?C (117 ?F)

CPU #1 / Core #4 47 ?C (117 ?F)

North Bridge 35 ?C (95 ?F)

VRM 67 ?C (153 ?F)

GPU1: GPU 76 ?C (169 ?F)

GPU1: GPU Ambient 68 ?C (154 ?F)

GPU1: GPU VRM 60 ?C (140 ?F)

GPU2: GPU 75 ?C (167 ?F)

GPU2: GPU Memory 67 ?C (153 ?F)

GPU2: GPU Ambient 71 ?C (160 ?F)

GPU2: GPU VRM 58 ?C (136 ?F)

GPU3: GPU 76 ?C (169 ?F)

GPU3: GPU Ambient 75 ?C (167 ?F)

GPU3: GPU VRM 59 ?C (138 ?F)

GPU4: GPU 74 ?C (165 ?F)

GPU4: GPU Memory 66 ?C (151 ?F)

GPU4: GPU Ambient 66 ?C (151 ?F)

GPU4: GPU VRM 55 ?C (131 ?F)

WDC WD1500AHFD-00RAR1 48 ?C (118 ?F)

PDF's attached.

EVEREST_Reports_Idle_Temp.pdf

EVEREST_Reports_load.pdf

Thanks,

Aniv

@ Aniv:

I'd be interested in hearing how that v8 is working out for you. I am building a new PC with a Phenom II X4 940 QC and am debating between the v8 and a cooler from Noctua. It's stock 3.0Ghz but I may want to bump that up to around 3.3Ghz. Would be interested to hear your overall thoughts about it thus far.

Kick-ass setup you got there, by the way. I'm inspired. =)

I'd highly recommend the sunbeamtech core contact freezer. Idle at 23c, and load at 36c. Running with a Phenom 920. And that's with the fan at low. It's also not as expensive as the v8.

  • 3 weeks later...

I liked the EVGA X58 Board so much that I decided to do a second build and use it as my my coding/browsing/2d graphics work pc. Parts from my old coding and gaming box are going to be decomissioned soon , watch neobay for some good deals.

Here are some pics:

post-65771-1237620564_thumb.jpg

post-65771-1237620579_thumb.jpg

post-65771-1237620589_thumb.jpg

Thanks

Regards,

Aniv

To people on neowin.net this system is probably something that's only dreamed of, but this system is actually veyr slow, and below average on today's standards considering what you likley paid for. You seriously need a faster CPU and faster Graphics processing. I feel sorry for you atm. For one you need OC's on both. I'm sorry to see you have low scores on 3dMark as well. Hmm you must be a noob (no offense) or a beginner to this stuff. If you want to actually make this computer change from very slow, to very fast, or need help getting more FPS in your games go to xtremesystems. Quad SLI 295's don't perform as fast as 3-way SLI GTX 285's either so you're also slower there. Your clocks and CPU are very slow, are they not?. Think about the potential of what you can actually do with your system. I am speaking to move you to shame on purpose! Not to bash you. I want you to understand you can do better than this with that system, because EVERYBODY has this system now, and its boringly standard now, and people get them all suped up, so I know you can do better. Here's something for you to chew on for a while. Let this be encouraging becuase you can do this with an I7 920 with the EVGA X58 classsified board ( not to be mistaken with your board). It's 5.4 Ghz running at 1.68v and 7-8-7-19-T1 timings at 2:12 Memory. Dram frequency is 1120Mhz, so your computer is lacking in performance of whatyou can do

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/6min39sec.JPG - HERE IS THE LINK FOR FULL SIZE, because you can't see the clocks here.

6min39sec.JPG

Edited by MarcusG
@aniv

what are the Case & CPU fans are you using ?

you temperature look great

Thanks dude! I am using the Coolermaster V8 and the Coolermaster Spartan CSX Case with standard front and rear exhaust fan (no fans attached on the side window). I have to yet check the temperatures on the HAF932 build, but it wont be a true comparison to the other build since this is using a 850W PSU, 2 WD 1TB Drives and a single 260 GTX.

@ MarcusG : I am a "noob and a beginner" by your standards and I am not offended by your silly remarks ;) If I wanted to OC I would have.

Personally speaking I wouldn't oc until a while down the road.. firstly you don't REALLY need the extra horses what you have will run what you want quite well enough, and secondly AND most importantly... you don't want to damage your new equipment, I certainly didn't when I built my first multi core pc... I got a E0 q9550 (2.83@1333mhz) and 2 gb of 1600 ram, so to max the ram I upped the cpu fsb to 400 and lowered my multiplier to 7.5 gave me a very modest 3ghz@1600 and didn't tax the chip. Rock solid for a 24/7 machine.

To people on neowin.net this system is probably something that's only dreamed of, but this system is actually veyr slow, and below average on today's standards considering what you likley paid for. You seriously need a faster CPU and faster Graphics processing. I feel sorry for you atm. For one you need OC's on both. I'm sorry to see you have low scores on 3dMark as well. Hmm you must be a noob (no offense) or a beginner to this stuff. If you want to actually make this computer change from very slow, to very fast, or need help getting more FPS in your games go to xtremesystems. Quad SLI 295's don't perform as fast as 3-way SLI GTX 285's either so you're also slower there. Your clocks and CPU are very slow, are they not?. Think about the potential of what you can actually do with your system. I am speaking to move you to shame on purpose! Not to bash you. I want you to understand you can do better than this with that system, because EVERYBODY has this system now, and its boringly standard now, and people get them all suped up, so I know you can do better. Here's something for you to chew on for a while. Let this be encouraging becuase you can do this with an I7 920 with the EVGA X58 classsified board ( not to be mistaken with your board). It's 5.4 Ghz running at 1.68v and 7-8-7-19-T1 timings at 2:12 Memory. Dram frequency is 1120Mhz, so your computer is lacking in performance of whatyou can do

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/6min39sec.JPG - HERE IS THE LINK FOR FULL SIZE, because you can't see the clocks here.

1.68v for cpu ?

get prepared for some fried chips

@ MarcusG : I am a "noob and a beginner" by your standards and I am not offended by your silly remarks ;) If I wanted to OC I would have.

You shouldn't be offended ^^. Telling you your system is "very slow" is just me reemphasizing the point that it's capable of going faster. Your system isn't necessarily "slow" at all realistically speaking. I have a strange personality, so sometimes you might take me wrong, but continue to be mild tempered and in time you'll understand me more. I know it did sound a little harsh though... I'm %150 sure you can get some good clocks out of that setup. You will get more than what you paid for if you do it correctly. My GPU setup is actually the same as yours, but I needed to increase volts to 1.200 to raise my clocks above 720Mhz core and be stable at the same time. The shaders on the 295 are very heat limited, so i suggest if you decide to OC them to increase video game performance, then you will need some rather adaquate cooling methods. With these cards, it's learned by many that it doesn't really depend on your voltages, but it really depends on your cooling method. Your CPU is a different story though.

PS. oh and yes, i do like your system very much. Who can resist an I7 with the two best video cards on the planet? not many can.

1.68v for cpu ?

get prepared for some fried chips

Yeah it can get very hot without proper cooling. I'm using hypercooling. My case is freezing cold, but I don't need to enable sub-zero cooling options in my EVGA mobo since the volts are so high it keeps the system at some pretty normal temps.

Edited by MarcusG
To people on neowin.net this system is probably something that's only dreamed of, blah blah blah...

MarcusG, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

MarcusG, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Billy Madison (played by Adam Sandler)

Classic!

MarcusG, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

:) I knew someone was going to say this. Now relax, don't turn a flame into a fire. Although it is true what I said. This forum does NOT evolve around topics like this, and you and I both konw that. Although It would be nicer if they did have more sub-forums here about these subjects, then more overclockers would be here. Trust me you don't know much about this kind of stuff, that's because likley you're here at Neowin, a place that thrives more on other topics that people are more interested in and there's nothing wrong with that. My point still holds correct. I admire your insults though. Keep em commin'. I hope i'm encouraging you. ^^

Edited by MarcusG
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!