Megan Fox To play Lara Croft?


Recommended Posts

I actually had to check imdb to see who Megan Fox was... turned out to be the Transformers chick, lol. I don't know, she looks too average for me.

Keira on the other hand is super hot, but doesn't seem like she'd fit on Lara's role. Her physique is just too delicate for the part.

She's nothing "special". No hotter than the girls we all meet out on saturday nights! Why so fappeous?

Really? I mean, Really?! Look closer...

transformers-jun19-megan-fox-look-hot.jpg

transformers-jun19-megan-fox-looking-sexy2.jpg

Just average?

Are you serious?

Well, she is kinda. There is hotter looking women walking past you in the street. Megan Fox just seems like any other girl who works hard on her body and can be caked in make up. Far more stunners than her who are more naturally beautiful and go into in jesus christ wow! when they dress up and put a face on to highlight their features like eyes and lips. Just think back to Transformers when she is in the action scenes and getting a little bit dirty, too much make up. What is she going to look like toned down for Tomb Raider, I doubt anything special.

Yes I am serious, and no need to "look closer".

I see girls this attractive all the time. Sure they aren't EVERYWHERE you look. But chances are that if I'm out, I'll chat to someone of similar appeal.

Don't elevate people because they have been expensively made-up, well lit and airbrushed.

Well, I've never seen her act so I can't comment on her acting ability, so I'll rate her average until I know better (I've seen Angelina Jolie's acting, I rate her terrible). I think a British actress would be better though, maybe Rachel Weisz, she's good.

As long as Chris Barrie returns, it doesn't matter who plays Croft.

Seriously though, this is the most important issue.

I actually had to check imdb to see who Megan Fox was... turned out to be the Transformers chick, lol. I don't know, she looks too average for me.

Keira on the other hand is super hot, but doesn't seem like she'd fit on Lara's role. Her physique is just too delicate for the part.

Keira could always work out a bit for the role. Won't give her stupid size wabs like Lara though I admit. But to be honest, fit athletic woman don't usually have big wabs. Even Angie had to work out for the role, she just happens to have bigger wabs. LOL.

I don't see what the big deal is about these actors looks, I see girls that look like them or look even better all the time... ok, maybe not all the time but maybe 3 or 4 for every nightclub.

Anyways I think Keira knightley is way too skinny to play Lara Croft, she doesn't look athletic in the least bit.

A JXA thread about beautiful girls, what's new? In all fairness though, I do not agree that Megan Fox takes the role as to me she is just a pretty face. Now, Rhona on the other hand fits the bill...

Scirwode

Just average?

Are you serious?

I'm going to have to disagree also and say megan is just average. I don't she would suit the role either. Keira although very hot is to skinny as Popcorned said :p

What ever happened to Alison Carroll? She is also average in my opinion but I think she would suit the role much better.

EDIT: She is also British :)

alison-carroll-croft-8118-8.jpg

Edited by GrimReeper
I saw this and thought who started the threaded...and I took one guess :p

Only one guess :p ?

Scirwode

That pic above of someone dressed up as Lara.

Am I seeing a little bit of lip there at the top of the right leg? LOL

It's certainly not been phopped yet, as the BCG mark is still visible.

haha I'm not seeing this supposed lip you speak of :p

Might be some lip in this pic or here but I'm not seeing any.

Sorry for the confusion, Alison Carroll (girl i posted above) will play Lara in the video games only. I wonder if she can act lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Samsung T7 external SSD deal lasts less than a day by Sayan Sen Recently we had covered some nice deals of internal NVMe SSDs which include the 4TB TeamGroup G50 for only $400, the WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB for just $243, as well as the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB for $370. If however you require an external SSD for portability and quick data transfers and have a budget of less than $200 the Samsung T7 1TB model is currently on a limited time deal at just $190, it's lowest price in nearly three months. The deal ends today so you better hurry if you need one (purchase link below). The T7 weighs in at just 72 grams meaning it should be fairly easy to carry around helping in the portability department. Via its USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface the T7 promises sequential read speeds of up to 1050 MB/s and writes of 1000 MB/s. It is also fairly robust with a drop protection of up to 2 meters, though bear in mind that this is not waterproof. For that you will have to choose the rugged T7 Shield. The technical specifications of the Samsung T7 1TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Model Code (1TB) MU-PC1T0T / MU-PC1T0H Interface USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Dimensions (W × H × D) 85 × 57 × 8 mm Weight 72 g Sequential Read Speed Up to 1,050 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 1,000 MB/s Drop Resistance Up to 2 m (6.6 ft) Encryption AES 256-bit hardware encryption Operating Temperature 0°C to 60°C Non-Operating Temperature -40°C to 85°C Humidity 5% to 95% (non-condensing) Shock Resistance 1,500 G, duration 0.5 ms, 3-axis (non-operating) Vibration Resistance 20–2,000 Hz, 20 G (non-operating) Get it at the link below: Samsung T7 Portable SSD, 1TB External Solid State Drive, MU-PC1T0T/AM, Gray: $189.98 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I just wish they would put more love into Virtual Desktops. There is just so much more they could do.
    • Sounds like you just skimmed over the review, I answer all those questions in it. Although I admit I did not test if DTS works over the headphones, when I get some time I will test this. My personal use case is more speaker-driven (I cover this in the review too).
    • It actually does the same exact thing as yours, 7.1 virtual surround over headphones. From the product page: "Experience sound that surrounds you with 7.1 virtual surround, delivering a wider, more immersive soundstage for movies, games, and music." So both of them are two channel, with 7.1 virtual surround that only work in Headphones mode.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!