Megan Fox To play Lara Croft?

By SuperJediMedia
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Pajter

Posted
Posted
Don't elevate people because they have been expensively made-up, well lit and airbrushed.

That is just too damn right mate. I'm totally with you! :yes:

I don't recall that being a requirement for TR movies...

:rofl:

I personally thought the Tomb Raider movies sucked so far. Wouldn't bother to go see a new one.

Grand Master

Xero

Posted
Posted

Rhona would be the best imo. As much as I love miss Fox, she's too young and I doubt she's that good of an actress to play the role of Lara Croft. Keira is far too skinny, weight or no weight she's not right for the role. Even Kate Beckinsale who I also love wouldn't be right. As much as we'd all love to see her in skimpy shorts and tight shirts it just wouldn't suit her. Rhona would be awesome. However I will say I did enjoy Jolie playing the role, mmm those big lips :p and her other assets of course.

Grand Master

Brandon Live Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
She's nothing "special". No hotter than the girls we all meet out on saturday nights!

Sometimes I hate living in Seattle :p

I dated a girl last summer that looked quite a bit like her, but she was from LA. Lots of hot girls, too bad they're all nuts.

Grand Master

x-byte

Posted
Posted
She doesn't have the...equipment to play Lara Croft. She is as flat chested as my driveway. Jessica Alba or Jessica Biel would be better suited to play Lara.

Did you see Kira Knightley in Pirates? This isn't really a problem, even Angelina Jolie had some work on the front side as Lara Croft. The new Lara Croft also have been reduced in that area now.

pic_1180290912_1.jpg

Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

You just sealed the deal for me, McK! Normally I don't say this but she's really hot. Even more now that I know she's a "geek at heart". :blush:

PS: I think there's something wrong with her belly button. It looks like a mini... nevermind.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By cleverclogs · Posted

      Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • The Microsoft Office feature that time forgot

      By cleverclogs · Posted

      Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!