Recommended Posts

I think V needs more lizards, don't you? ? Avi

MICKEY: Personally, yes. I love lizards! But the creators of the V remake have been aiming for more action than sci-fi ? hence the shortage of all things green and scaly. Executive producer Scott Rosenbaum says that won't change. "You won't see the full-on what the Visitors look like underneath [until early in] Season 2," he says. Yes, he said Season 2, and he said it with confidence. :o

Source: TV Guide

Come on people. Get real. The show is not bad at all. The CGI are a hell of a whole lot better than the 80s version. You have to remember, this is a Television show, not a motion picture, therefore the budget is very limited and I think that they have done a great job for the budget they have.The effects are not bad at all. The series is getting better and more interesting. The ratings are going up a bit and that is a good sign.

"ABC's Fall 2010 schedule won't be announced until Tuesday, May 18, but in good news - Variety is saying that V is showing more ratings promise than Flashfoward and "appears to have the edge for a return."

SOURCE

Yeah I definitely like flashforward better than v. My problem with V is I dont like ANY of the characters. The actors really aren't that good.

You are kidding right?

Ana, played by Morena Baccarin, is an awesome character. She is beautiful, intelligent yet deadly, creepy and pure evil. Hobbs is also a very good character. I like Hobbs. He reminds me of Ham Tyler from the original series. They are all doing a great job. Give the series time to evolve. When Star Trek: The Next Generation premiered on TV everyone whined and complaint about the characters, saying things like "Oh they are not the same as the original", or "The characters suck. The actors playing them suck" - Bah, bah, bah...Well guess what? It lasted 7 years on TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.....And everyone missed them when the series finalized.

Give "V" a chance. They are just starting. They are showing signs of improvement. The episodes are getting better each time, more interesting. This isn't meant to be like the original "V". Same aliens, different style, different characters. Give them a chance and stop whining so much!!!!!!

Give "V" a chance. They are just starting. They are showing signs of improvement. The episodes are getting better each time, more interesting. This isn't meant to be like the original "V". Same aliens, different style, different characters. Give them a chance and stop whining so much!!!!!!

we've had 11 episodes I think that's alot more then most people give other shows a chance :p

UPDATED: ABC's "V" -- on the bubble for a renewal and approaching the finish line for the season -- climbed in the ratings Tuesday night.

"V" (5.7 million viewers, 2.3 adults 18-49 rating) rose 10% in the rating. Not a large bump, yet showing any uptick at this crucial stage could help seal a second season pickup. "V" is already favored for a renewal over fellow ABC freshman sci-fi drama "FlashForward," which also recently improved, but has a lower overall ratings base. Lead-in "Lost" (10.3 million, 4.1) was up a tenth. ABC's "Dancing With the Stars" (12.5 million, 2.5) changed course, rising 4%.

"V" was one of several shows to demonstrate improvement last night despite the NBA playoffs continuing to draw viewers on cable.

Yeah I definitely like flashforward better than v. My problem with V is I dont like ANY of the characters. The actors really aren't that good.

If I could choose I'll pick FlashForward. I think it is a better show too but I still like V. Last night was pretty good I think.

I'm confused about what happened last episode? Can somebody explain the ending?

What is the connection between Hobbs and Marcus?

Hobbs stole research on that guys hard drive, the guy was researching something that is incredibly dangerous to the V's, hobbs is selling the data on the drive to marcus.

Ya I know THAT.

But is it saying that Marcus and Hobbs somehow related? Hobbs = V? Marcus = Fifth Column?

my understanding is marcus wants the research so he can destroy it and keep people from using it against the v's and hobbs who is a scumbag terrorist doesn't really care about selling 5th column oit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!