11th hour decision.


Recommended Posts

Alright, I've stayed up pretty much all night, and the Live CD couldn't boot using our old scripts. The new kernel breaks them. However, those were the old and not-really-like scripts anyways BUT, X was autodetected and worked with those. The ones we DO like and that might work don't start X. I'm making a Live CD the "new" way right now. It'll be the same exact thing as the Preview was supposed to be, but X probably won't be autodetected and it'll drop into a shell. However, you can always run X -configure or other X things from inside there and manually start X.

With that being said, does anyone know of any working X detection scripts for Arch Linux?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/729642-11th-hour-decision/
Share on other sites

Back in the days when I tried tomake a distro on my own, I used Larch scripts for creating the Live system (just as the FaunOS proyect does), and for X autodetection, I used a simple init script that was executed by having it default in the DAEMONS array in /etc/rc.conf ... if you want to, I could create some basic autodetection script, or yet better, some semi-automatic config tool... which would ask the user some info and then autoconf based on that, but for this we would need to have both nvidia and ati drivers...

Hmmm...

Found an old script for autoconf... needs some tweaking but will do. (and needs transalation to english, sorry its in spanish :p)

#!/bin/bash
#
#Script de Autoconfiguracion de X.org para Arch Linux
# LTSmash (c) 2008 - lord.ltsmash </at/> gmail </dot/> com
#Estas legalmente autorizado para distribuir este software y usarlo como quieras mientras que mantengas este mensaje de copyright

case $1 in
--help)
echo 'Este es un script de autoconfiguracion para Xorg creado para su uso con NWN-Live y otros sistemas Live-CD basados en Arch Linux, el cual esta hecho para ser ejecutado automaticamente y si no funciona como es debido tiene algunos sistemas fallback que deben ser activados por el usuario usando las opciones...'
echo 'Uso:'
echo 'mkxorgconf <parametro>'
echo
echo 'El script mkxorgconf solamente acepta un parametro a la vez'
echo 'Las opciones disponibles son -hwd (Esta opcion hace una configuracion sin ayuda del usuario) y -xconf (esta opcion ejecuta un programa el cual requiere conocimientos del hardware de la maquina y por lo tanto no es automatico).'
echo 'La opcion recomendada es -hwd'
exit 0;;
-hwd)
hwd -xa
mv /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/xorg.conf
echo 'Configuracion creada con exito, desea editarla (S/n)?:'
read input1
	case $input1 in
	S)
	echo 'Editando con nano...'
	nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf
	echo 'Ahora ejecute "startx"'
	exit 0;;
	*)
	echo 'Finalizando, ahora ejecute "startx"'
	exit 0;;
	esac;;
-xconf)
xorgconfig
echo 'Desea editar manualmente su xorg.conf? (S/n)'
read input1
	case $input1 in
	S)
	echo 'Editando con nano...'
	nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf
	echo 'Ahora ejecute "startx"'
	exit 0;;
	*)
	echo 'Finalizando, ahora ejecute "startx"'
	exit 0;;
	esac;;
*)
echo 'Opcion invalida, use el parametro --help para ayuda, abortando...'
exit 1;;
esac

#Metodo automatico (FaunOS)
Xorg -configure &> /dev/null
mv /xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf &> /dev/null

mkbootcd?

http://projects.xennet.org/svnarch/mkbootcd/trunk/mkbootcd

What Arch is using right now are the Archboot images, and thos ecould be perfectly used as a base for what we want. or we could actually ask for help to the new Arch's release team :p

http://www.archlinux.org/news/430/

EDIT:

Hmm, nope. Well, there's larch, which I've been repeating, but we loose anything if I do it again:

http://larch.berlios.de/doc/index.html

These are some scripts to create a Live-CD system, based off Arch... and let me say: They work really nice.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!