SuperPI 1M *Top Times Database*


Recommended Posts

*Sticky Please?* :D

Times will be grouped based upon 1 second intervals.

This is to keep track of the fastest SuperPi 1M runs on Neowin.net! First of all you will need: SuperPI Mod v1.5 - Straight from Techpowerup....I didn't scan this file, so download at your own risk & scan it...I am not responsible if your computer wrecks havoc among the world after downloading this program

Next you just need a screen shot with your SuperPi Mod 1.5 time (showing the PI Calc done dialogue box - with the "OK" visible), CPU-Z CPU & Memory Tab. All on the same screen shot for it to be counted as legit.

NOTES/RULES:

? You can post your fastest time for each Processor you own. Updates on the same Processor will take the place of the old submission.

? You need a screenshot with your SuperPI Mod 1.5 time (showing PI Calc done dialogue box - with the "OK" visible), CPU-z CPU Tabrequired- CPU-z Memory taboptionalAll on the same screen shot for it to be counted as legit.

? Your overclock does not have to be Prime95 stable, or anything of that sort...if it can run the 1M SuperPI, it counts.

? When you first startup PI please ensure that you re-size the window to show a clear view of all loops and the final time.

? In the title bar of your post write up the summary of your computer. Example:

Lyric - 10.617s / Gigabyte EP45T-DS3R / E8400 @ 4.5GHz / Patriot DDR3 @ 7-7-7-18 / Zalman 9700 CPU Cooler

? Also include other system specs that maybe helpful to other contestants if they are not listed in your sAny posts that do not follow these rules will not be posted!

? Any posts where screen shots are no longer available for whatever reason will still remain on the score list. But, without a screen shot they will no longer be eligible for the Top 10 Processor lists. If you are currently listed and you notice your screen shot is now missing all of the sudden, make a new post if you still have the screen shot and it will be eligible for the Top 10 section again.

? Please try to host your images on Photobucket, ImageShack or another host to save bandwidth on Neowin as much as possible.

Top10 SuperPI 1M Times* INTEL Processors:

Intel Spreadsheet

*Top10 SuperPI 1M Times* AMD Processors:[/u]

AMD Spreadsheet

Sub-category's: will be used for People who didn't make it into the Top 10 categories, or get bumped off the Top10.

Sethos - 13.45 / Asus P6T WS/Pro / i7 940 @ Stock / Corsair DDR3 @ 8-8-8-20

Mystic - 13.744 / Asus P5Q-Pro / Q9450 @ 3.4GHz / Corsair 4GB DDR3 @ 5-5-5-18 / Noctua NH-U12P

+shift. - 14.297s / GA-P35-S3G / E7200 @ 3.8 / 4GB OCZ Platinum XTC DDR2-800 5-5-5 / N/A

DigitalManifestations - 14.992s - Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR / Q6600 @ 3.6GHz / 4GB DDR2 800 OCZ XTC Titanium 4-4-4-15 / Stock Intel Cooler

CrashGordon - 15.607s / Asus P5K-E / E8200 @ 3.2GHZ / OCZ Reaper DDR2-800 4-4-4-12

Tel - 15.935s / Asus P5E / Q6600 @ 3.6GHz / Dominator DDR2 @ 5-5-5-15 2T 2.1v / TRUE120 Cooler

PeterUK ? 17.250s / FOXCONN P9657AA-8EKRS2H / E6700 @ 3GHz / DDR2 @ 5-5-5-15 / Coolermaster

Escalade_GT - 17.375s / HP 30C5 / Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo T9300 Penryn @ 2.50GHz / 2GB DDR2-667 @ 5-5-

Malbojia - 17.438 / GA-EP35-DS3R / Xeon X3350 @ 2.6 / 2GB OCZ Reaper X DDR2-8500 @ Stock timings? / Stock Intel Cooler

iZoom - 21.640 / EVGA 680i SLI / E6400 @ 2.8 / 3GB Corsair Dominator DDR2-800 @ 4-4-4-12 / Arctic 7 Pro

technikal - 26.531s / Gigabyte 965P-S3 / E6300 @ 2.24GHz / 2GB PC6400 5-5-5-18 / Stock Intel Cooler

Edited by Lyric
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/730492-superpi-1m-top-times-database/
Share on other sites

I was running a few processes and programs in the background, so may not be entirely accurate - I should also get overclocking soon! :p

Sethos - 13.450s / Asus P6T WS/Professional / i7 940 @ Stock / Corsair DDR3 @ 8 - 8 - 8 - 20 / Noctua nh-u12p - 2 x 120MM

Unavngivet.png

Will update again as soon as I get overclocking (Y)

i'm gonna post mine this weekend when i have more time to OC

if prime95 stability is out the window i'm gonna try to push past 4GHz lol

Go for it! If it can run SuperPI 1mil, then it counts...no need for any other stability for pure benchmarking. :D

Here's my submission. I haven't really tweaked the overclocking yet.

Max? - 11.437s / Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i920 @ 3.61GHz / Corsair 6GB DDR3 @ 8-8-8-21 / Stock Intel Cooler

EDIT: Removed attachment for bandwidth purposes.

Edited by Max
Here's my submission. I haven't really tweaked the overclocking yet.

Max? - 11.437s / Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i920 @ 3.61GHz / Corsair 6GB DDR3 @ 8-8-8-21 / Stock Intel Cooler[/quothow come oc with a stock cooler:wacko:cko:

my cpu@stock w/stock cooler run ~54c i:wacko:cko:

room temperature ~25c

i am must be doing something horibly wrong

edfixed[/b]

Edited by skynetXrules
who come oc with a stock cooler! :wacko:

my cpu@stock w/stock cooler run ~54c idle :wacko:

room temperature ~25c

i am must be doing something horibly wrong

Core i7's can handle temps of 80c. The key is in the thermal compound; MX-2 ftw. Mine is only running at about 55c as well.

My new attempt:

Max? - 10.406s / Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i920 @ 3.98GHz / Corsair 6GB DDR3 @ 8-8-8-21 / Stock Intel Cooler

post-26671-1233853022_thumb.jpg

^ my computer just froze from stress test :(

stock cooler FTL

edit :

funny just checked the bios

and noticed Eist , C1E disabled renabled them

then i saw a setting says C3/C6/C7 support which was off also

so i enable it too

the temperature improved

from ~55c to ~45 :)

but i guess i should get aftermarket cooler afterall ....

Edited by skynetXrules
thought i'd chip in from the somewhat older school. won't be on the list for long lol.

technikal - 26.531s / Gigabyte 965P-S3 / E6300 @ 2.24GHz / 2GB PC6400 5-5-5-18 / Stock intel

It's all good...you know 65nm can go as high as 1.55v right? just I wouldn't run it 24/7, only for benchies. :D

See if you can oc it a bit and get a better score. =)

It's all good...you know 65nm can go as high as 1.55v right? just I wouldn't run it 24/7, only for benchies. :D

See if you can oc it a bit and get a better score. =)

i ran my machine @ 2.8GHz for months (at less than default voltage) without any hassle. the only thing with my mobo is that it's a passive cooled FSB so i went down to 2.2GHz to save burning it out faster :p

the machine still does all i want it to do without any problems so i don't really need to push it any further.

How do you get that screen to stay after you perform the stress test? Mine goes back to the default screen right away.

Don't click the "OK" untill you've taken the screen shot...just move it out of the way if its blocking the time, should work fine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!