Lyric Posted March 5, 2009 Author Share Posted March 5, 2009 The king is back!:p:pMax? - 9.656s / Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i920 @ 4.305GHz (21*205 bclk) / Corsair 6GB DDR3 @ 8-8-8-21 / Stock Intel Cooler CPU-Z doesn't show the true clock as it doesn't take into account the Turbo Boost +1 multiplier, but meh. Congrats! :updated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bridger Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 1M SuperPi : 09.405s CPU: Intel Core i7 CPU 920 @ 4426.82 MHz (210.8 * 21) Motherboard: Asus P6T RAM Type: 6GB (3x2GB) Corsair Dominator DDR3 @ 8-8-8-24 CPU Cooler: Stock Intel CPU-Z Validation: 589457 Running nice and stable here :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 12.687s / ASUS P6T6 WS Revolution / Ci7 940 @ 3.33GHz / 12GB Corsair DDR3 1160MHz @ 8-8-8-20 / Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme CPU Cooler I'm not really the overclocker type. Prefer just to buy the high-end stuff and leave it at stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Veteran Posted June 23, 2009 Veteran Share Posted June 23, 2009 1M SuperPi : 09.405sCPU: Intel Core i7 CPU 920 @ 4426.82 MHz (210.8 * 21) Motherboard: Asus P6T RAM Type: 6GB (3x2GB) Corsair Dominator DDR3 @ 8-8-8-24 CPU Cooler: Stock Intel CPU-Z Validation: 589457 Running nice and stable here :) Congrats! I dont think I can beat that, not yet anyway... Isn't it strange that the top two overclocks are using the stock heater :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Posted June 30, 2009 Author Share Posted June 30, 2009 updated, and am now using Google spreadsheet as it is a lot easier to update, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 10.418s / ASUS P6T6 WS Revolution / Ci7 940 @ 4.00GHz / 12GB Corsair DDR3 1200MHz @ 9-9-9-24 / Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme CPU Cooler Shaved off a couple seconds by going from 3.3GHz to 4GHz. Again I'm not really the overclocker sort so I won't push for 4.2Ghz I know in the screenshot it says 3999.9MHz but whilst SuperPI was running it was at 4.002Mhz so I hope your forgive me for saying 4Ghz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 updated. Thanks Lyric and I just wanted to say I think it's great when members of the community manage things like these threads. You're doing a great job (Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 Thanks Lyric and I just wanted to say I think it's great when members of the community manage things like these threads. You're doing a great job (Y) no problem, it gives me something to do in my spare time.... :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subject Delta Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 19.754 seconds, hardly impressive, but then I haven't really pushed my overclock. Motherboard is an ASRock Penryn 1600SLI-110DB memory, 8GB of Corsair XMS2 PC6400, cooling: Thermaltake Kandalf LCS integrated liquid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 19.754 seconds, hardly impressive, but then I haven't really pushed my overclock. Motherboard is an ASRock Penryn 1600SLI-110DB memory, 8GB of Corsair XMS2 PC6400, cooling: Thermaltake Kandalf LCS integrated liquid Take that bad boy to 3.6GHz ! (Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subject Delta Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 Would if my crappy board would allow FSB/Memory unlinking. Kinda being limited by the memory at the moment :( time for a new board once the creditors have been satisfied methinks :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Posted August 17, 2009 Author Share Posted August 17, 2009 19.754 seconds, hardly impressive, but then I haven't really pushed my overclock. Motherboard is an ASRock Penryn 1600SLI-110DB memory, 8GB of Corsair XMS2 PC6400, cooling: Thermaltake Kandalf LCS integrated liquid can you format it like I suggested please? then i will add it...thanks in advance. updating mine as well currently. 8.942s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 Take that bad boy to 3.6GHz ! (Y) man, that ain't easy as it sound :p i had hard time to reach 3.3GHz with my Q6600 rev B3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Posted August 17, 2009 Author Share Posted August 17, 2009 man, that ain't easy as it sound :pi had hard time to reach 3.3GHz with my Q6600 rev B3 why is your i7 at stock? I'm going to call IAS on you! (intel abuse services!) hehe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 man, that ain't easy as it sound :pi had hard time to reach 3.3GHz with my Q6600 rev B3 That sucks. I had a B3 QX6700 I could hit 3.6 on Water but it had an unlocked multiplier it was a lot harder using FSB alone as my 680i had an issue with the GTLRef voltage which affected the maximum FSB when using a quad core. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astra.Xtreme Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 So I upgraded my laptop to 4GB of RAM and put on Win7 64-bit, but I'm not able to even get to my time when I was running XP w/ 2GB of RAM. Is this a case of Win7 being a bit slower, or is my time pretty much at its peak no matter what? Just curious ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Posted August 17, 2009 Author Share Posted August 17, 2009 So I upgraded my laptop to 4GB of RAM and put on Win7 64-bit, but I'm not able to even get to my time when I was running XP w/ 2GB of RAM.Is this a case of Win7 being a bit slower, or is my time pretty much at its peak no matter what? Just curious ;) cpu speed makes the most difference in this benchmark....ram helps though, tighter timings, more gb doesn't matter if its running slower than the 2gb you were using before. like with intel, mhz makes the most difference...amd i think ram timing adjustments make the most difference if i'm not mistaken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 why is your i7 at stock? I'm going to call IAS on you! (intel abuse services!) hehe. my i7 is having vacation you know ,it is summer ;) seriously ,i am researching some stuffs atm , rather keep it a stock atm crank it up back later :yes: ----------------- by the way lyric ..... could you please change my forum name to current one (old name: skynetxrules ) guess you didn't recognize me :p That sucks. I had a B3 QX6700 I could hit 3.6 on Water but it had an unlocked multiplier it was a lot harder using FSB alone as my 680i had an issue with the GTLRef voltage which affected the maximum FSB when using a quad core. the rig was at time , Q6600 P965-DQ6 rev1.1 OCZ gold 4GB@800mhz CL5 blueorb II case : Tsunami Dream honsty what i think that limited me at that time : heat concern since my country in hot area + i *think* that my memory hate 400 mhz FSB so i settled for 370FSB (3.3GHz) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnelsoninjax Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 jnelsoninjax - 20.164s/DFI Lanparty 790GX-M2RS/Phenom II X4 940 @3.5 GHZ/4 GB crucial ballistix DDR2@5-5-5-15/Sunbeam CR-CCTF 120 mm Core-Contact Freezer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 what with the thread dead already? comon :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted September 8, 2009 Share Posted September 8, 2009 what with the thread dead already?comon :p The 1M scores are already really fast it's difficult to get them lower without using some extreme cooling or a new CPU. Wonder what the newer i7's will score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+PeterUK MVC Posted September 19, 2009 MVC Share Posted September 19, 2009 PeterUK ? 12.203s / Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4 / i7 860 @ stock with HTT & Turbo Boost / DDR3 @ 9-9-9-24 1600MHz XMP/ Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro v2 Turbo Boost really messes about with the Voltage and Multiplier when taking a screen shot. Waiting to stick Windows 7 on it.:cool:l: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subject Delta Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 19.754 seconds, hardly impressive, but then I haven't really pushed my overclock. Motherboard is an ASRock Penryn 1600SLI-110DB memory, 8GB of Corsair XMS2 PC6400, cooling: Thermaltake Kandalf LCS integrated liquid Got my CPU to run at 3.2 GHZ now, with a better board (specs in sig), and have been able to shave a couple of seconds off my time. Will see if I can get more speed soon and try even better still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subject Delta Posted November 11, 2009 Share Posted November 11, 2009 CPU now running stable at 3.4 GHZ, another result update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts