1 4850 X2 or 2 4850's

By DirtyLarry
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

What GPU Configuration Should I Use?  

41 members have voted

  1. 1. 1 4850 X2 or 2 4850's?

    • 1 4850 X2 (1GB)
      34
    • 2 4850's (1GB)
      7

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

So okay, I am pulling to plug on ordering my parts for my gaming PC, which the topic can be found here...

And I have to admit, I am really hesitant to do Crossfire as I am now reading a lot of posts and threads not only here, but on other sites, where people have some major issues with Crossfire, and also it seems a lot of people even question if running two cards even offers that much of a difference overall.

So do I get 2 regular 4850's and set them up in Crossfire, or do I spend that money and get 1 4850 X2, and maybe down the road when they become cheaper get another for Crossfire eventually.

I just want the best performance. I do not need to have two cards just to say I have two cards. I would much rather say I have better frames per second.

So please advise all, I am a bit confused as to what to do. I will be ordering in about 24 hours.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/730822-1-4850-x2-or-2-4850s/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Oh, and I also probably might go with a 4870 X2, messed up a bit on that part, but am considering the 4850 X2 as well as they definitely are a bit cheaper.

Strike that, 4870 X2's are to expensive. Poll is correct

Grand Master

ceminess

Posted
Posted

I agree here single card is better. Plus like you said you can always upgrade to a x2 crossfire config in the future.

Here is a review of the major graphics cards arranged in price and how they compare to other cards in there price range. If you are interested.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...phics,2086.html

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
I agree here single card is better. Plus like you said you can always upgrade to a x2 crossfire config in the future.

Here is a review of the major graphics cards arranged in price and how they compare to other cards in there price range. If you are interested.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...phics,2086.html

LOL Thanks. Reason I put LOL is I was just checking that out and then you posted it. (Y)

Definitely a super helpful link.

So I was considering possibly one regular 4870, but according to Tom's one 4850 X2 is better, so I will be going with one of them it looks like. :yes:

Apprentice

someone_162

Posted
Posted

Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

Mentor

Thirtythree

Posted
Posted
Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

It's somewhat different. The X2 series is all on a single PCB. They are not limited by having to work through a chipset on the motherboard like Crossfire and SLI is.

I also do not believe that the performance is limited to driver support for a game. Of course nVIDIA always does better than ATi with OpenGL but that's a difference between companies.

Grand Master

Argote

Posted
Posted
Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

Yes, AFAIK the X2 cards also use CrossfireX so any "problems" associated with that are also present (ie. some games do not support the acceleration).

Neowinian

DukeChutney

Posted
Posted

One 4850.

I did tons of research, and decided it was in no way worth the extra money to go with a 4870 over a 4850

My build can play every FPS game out there, and all the NFS games at highest resolution with no lag whatsoever.

Current Specs

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 [2.66]

ASUS P5Q LGA 775 P45

Radeon HD 4850 512MB

4GB Kingston DDR 266 [PC 2100]

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

Hmmm, did not know that at all. Interesting. Not really all that excited about hearing the X2 uses Crossfire even for one card.

And believe it or not, the two single 4850's are actually cheaper than the one X2. Now I am really confused.

Wait, so the single card solution has 1 GB for both GPUs and the separate cards have 1GB for each GPU?

Looks like 1GB for each GPU

I am thinking of getting this card...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814102809

Yes, AFAIK the X2 cards also use CrossfireX so any "problems" associated with that are also present (ie. some games do not support the acceleration).

Again, not super psyched to hear this. Hmmmm

One 4850.

I did tons of research, and decided it was in no way worth the extra money to go with a 4870 over a 4850

My build can play every FPS game out there, and all the NFS games at highest resolution with no lag whatsoever.

Current Specs

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 [2.66]

ASUS P5Q LGA 775 P45

Radeon HD 4850 512MB

4GB Kingston DDR 266 [PC 2100]

So you say not even an X2???? As that would save me a whole lot of money for sure...

Grand Master

Digitalx

Posted
Posted (edited)

X2 will have on par performance but potentially lower power consumption. As for optimization, hardly any games have actual optimization for SLi or CrossfireX so it's not something to bother worrying about.

2 4850 cards will be exactly the same but draw more power so economically thinking the X2 is more ideal but yeah.

Only con of X2 i can think of is size probably so just watch the case you buy cause you'll need a good amount of room

1 1GB 4870 would probably be sufficient enough possibly i think as duke said as long as you don't plan on gaming at 1920x1200 maxed out or anything too over the top in that region.

edit: wow wtf XFX 4870 lmao but looks good and is 20 cheaper then that X2 you linked to http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814150339

others:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814161265

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814131120

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814102801

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814161247

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814127397

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814127400

Edited by Digix
Apprentice

someone_162

Posted
Posted

@thirtythree, thanks for clarifying. Have read more about nvidia than ati but thought to see big benifits from sli a specific 'profile' had to be created for each individual game by nvidia? Figured there would be a similar situation for crossfire... Am I completely wrong here?

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

So now I am possibly thinking of getting just one 4870 non X2, just a regular 4870.... LOL sorry to further confuse things...

As far as room I have a nice Thermaltake Speedo Advanced case, so should be plenty of room.

and as far as PSU I also have a nice Thermaltake 1200 Watt PSU.

I will actually be reviewing both of the above when I put the PC together...

I'd say no, It would be better to have 2x4850

Or I can go with this, which was my original plan, and still the cheapest out of all of the plans.

Was originally going to go with two of these...

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
1200w psu is a bit over the top specially with onl a 4870 that amount of power you could run 2 4870X2 and a 4850 all in crossfirex.

It was supplied to me for a review, so although I realize it is way more than I need, I will be using it.

So now the question is, 1 4870, or 1 4850 X2?, or the original plan of 2 4850's?

Grand Master

Digitalx

Posted
Posted
It was supplied to me for a review, so although I realize it is way more than I need, I will be using it.

ah ok then thats alright lol was more price conscious about it but i guess will path a way for future upgrades if they need more juice :)

maybe these will help

http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-48...x-performance/1

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...nce-review.html

Remember with crossfirex you can say couple 4870 and 4850 in crossfirex alright.

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
ah ok then thats alright lol was more price conscious about it but i guess will path a way for future upgrades if they need more juice :)

I can power a small nation with it!! LOL

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
If you want to stick to a single card a GeForce GTX 285 would be best.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814150334

Don't know if it's faster than 2x4850's though...

LOL Now I am really confused...

Two things with this... Price is higher than i wanted... However 2nd thing is I have always used Nvidia and prefer their drivers... So...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Latest Rufus update improves new Windows 11 install method

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Latest Rufus update improves new Windows 11 install method by Taras Buria Pete Batard, the maker of Rufus, a very popular app for creating bootable Windows (and other OS) media, has released a new beta version of its app. Rufus 4.15 beta is now out, and while it offers no new features, there are all sorts of improvements and fixes, including for the new Windows 11 installation method that was introduced in version 4.14 in early May. The "Silent Windows 11 installation" is a new feature whose goal is to automate operating system installation. All you have to do is boot from the drive, and then Rufus takes over, doing all things for you, such as setting up a new account, skipping ads and prompts, and more. It is a very handy tool, but initially, it had some bugs and issues that required addressing. With version 4.15 beta, Rufus is fixing that, particularly a bug with installation failing at 75%, crashes on Snapdragon X-based PCs, and more. Here is the changelog: Rufus 4.15 beta is now available for download from its GitHub repository. If you have never used Rufus before, you can check out our guide here. It is a very useful utility to have, as it allows you to deal with plenty of Windows 11's annoyances, which are still there, despite Microsoft's ongoing efforts to fix them.
    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature

      By Slackerr · Posted

      Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop

      By thartist · Posted

      This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      78
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!