1 4850 X2 or 2 4850's


What GPU Configuration Should I Use?  

41 members have voted

  1. 1. 1 4850 X2 or 2 4850's?

    • 1 4850 X2 (1GB)
      34
    • 2 4850's (1GB)
      7


Recommended Posts

So okay, I am pulling to plug on ordering my parts for my gaming PC, which the topic can be found here...

And I have to admit, I am really hesitant to do Crossfire as I am now reading a lot of posts and threads not only here, but on other sites, where people have some major issues with Crossfire, and also it seems a lot of people even question if running two cards even offers that much of a difference overall.

So do I get 2 regular 4850's and set them up in Crossfire, or do I spend that money and get 1 4850 X2, and maybe down the road when they become cheaper get another for Crossfire eventually.

I just want the best performance. I do not need to have two cards just to say I have two cards. I would much rather say I have better frames per second.

So please advise all, I am a bit confused as to what to do. I will be ordering in about 24 hours.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/730822-1-4850-x2-or-2-4850s/
Share on other sites

Oh, and I also probably might go with a 4870 X2, messed up a bit on that part, but am considering the 4850 X2 as well as they definitely are a bit cheaper.

Strike that, 4870 X2's are to expensive. Poll is correct

I agree here single card is better. Plus like you said you can always upgrade to a x2 crossfire config in the future.

Here is a review of the major graphics cards arranged in price and how they compare to other cards in there price range. If you are interested.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...phics,2086.html

I agree here single card is better. Plus like you said you can always upgrade to a x2 crossfire config in the future.

Here is a review of the major graphics cards arranged in price and how they compare to other cards in there price range. If you are interested.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...phics,2086.html

LOL Thanks. Reason I put LOL is I was just checking that out and then you posted it. (Y)

Definitely a super helpful link.

So I was considering possibly one regular 4870, but according to Tom's one 4850 X2 is better, so I will be going with one of them it looks like. :yes:

Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

It's somewhat different. The X2 series is all on a single PCB. They are not limited by having to work through a chipset on the motherboard like Crossfire and SLI is.

I also do not believe that the performance is limited to driver support for a game. Of course nVIDIA always does better than ATi with OpenGL but that's a difference between companies.

Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

Yes, AFAIK the X2 cards also use CrossfireX so any "problems" associated with that are also present (ie. some games do not support the acceleration).

One 4850.

I did tons of research, and decided it was in no way worth the extra money to go with a 4870 over a 4850

My build can play every FPS game out there, and all the NFS games at highest resolution with no lag whatsoever.

Current Specs

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 [2.66]

ASUS P5Q LGA 775 P45

Radeon HD 4850 512MB

4GB Kingston DDR 266 [PC 2100]

Correct me if i'm wrong but I thought that the X2 variant of the card essentially meant there were 2 GPUs in crossfire, just mounted on the one board. This would mean that all the problems regarding crossfire you've read about would apply to both options. Performance should also be similar between the two choices. If the two single cards are cheaper and you have a motherboard with multiple pci-e slots and you're not likely to want to have quad gpus then maybe the 2 single cards would give you more bang-for-your-buck... Though the single card solution is definitely neater...

As for the benefits of mult-gpu itself I cant give any first hand comments (i have a single 8800gts) but I believe it is very dependent on which games you wish to play. If the game has been optimised in the drivers you are using then you can get close to 2x the performance from dual cards, if not the second card will have little impact at all...

Hope this helps

Seb

Hmmm, did not know that at all. Interesting. Not really all that excited about hearing the X2 uses Crossfire even for one card.

And believe it or not, the two single 4850's are actually cheaper than the one X2. Now I am really confused.

Wait, so the single card solution has 1 GB for both GPUs and the separate cards have 1GB for each GPU?

Looks like 1GB for each GPU

I am thinking of getting this card...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814102809

Yes, AFAIK the X2 cards also use CrossfireX so any "problems" associated with that are also present (ie. some games do not support the acceleration).

Again, not super psyched to hear this. Hmmmm

One 4850.

I did tons of research, and decided it was in no way worth the extra money to go with a 4870 over a 4850

My build can play every FPS game out there, and all the NFS games at highest resolution with no lag whatsoever.

Current Specs

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 [2.66]

ASUS P5Q LGA 775 P45

Radeon HD 4850 512MB

4GB Kingston DDR 266 [PC 2100]

So you say not even an X2???? As that would save me a whole lot of money for sure...

X2 will have on par performance but potentially lower power consumption. As for optimization, hardly any games have actual optimization for SLi or CrossfireX so it's not something to bother worrying about.

2 4850 cards will be exactly the same but draw more power so economically thinking the X2 is more ideal but yeah.

Only con of X2 i can think of is size probably so just watch the case you buy cause you'll need a good amount of room

1 1GB 4870 would probably be sufficient enough possibly i think as duke said as long as you don't plan on gaming at 1920x1200 maxed out or anything too over the top in that region.

edit: wow wtf XFX 4870 lmao but looks good and is 20 cheaper then that X2 you linked to http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814150339

others:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814161265

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814131120

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814102801

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814161247

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814127397

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814127400

Edited by Digix

@thirtythree, thanks for clarifying. Have read more about nvidia than ati but thought to see big benifits from sli a specific 'profile' had to be created for each individual game by nvidia? Figured there would be a similar situation for crossfire... Am I completely wrong here?

So now I am possibly thinking of getting just one 4870 non X2, just a regular 4870.... LOL sorry to further confuse things...

As far as room I have a nice Thermaltake Speedo Advanced case, so should be plenty of room.

and as far as PSU I also have a nice Thermaltake 1200 Watt PSU.

I will actually be reviewing both of the above when I put the PC together...

I'd say no, It would be better to have 2x4850

Or I can go with this, which was my original plan, and still the cheapest out of all of the plans.

Was originally going to go with two of these...

1200w psu is a bit over the top specially with onl a 4870 that amount of power you could run 2 4870X2 and a 4850 all in crossfirex.

It was supplied to me for a review, so although I realize it is way more than I need, I will be using it.

So now the question is, 1 4870, or 1 4850 X2?, or the original plan of 2 4850's?

It was supplied to me for a review, so although I realize it is way more than I need, I will be using it.

ah ok then thats alright lol was more price conscious about it but i guess will path a way for future upgrades if they need more juice :)

maybe these will help

http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-48...x-performance/1

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardw...nce-review.html

Remember with crossfirex you can say couple 4870 and 4850 in crossfirex alright.

ah ok then thats alright lol was more price conscious about it but i guess will path a way for future upgrades if they need more juice :)

I can power a small nation with it!! LOL

If you want to stick to a single card a GeForce GTX 285 would be best.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814150334

Don't know if it's faster than 2x4850's though...

LOL Now I am really confused...

Two things with this... Price is higher than i wanted... However 2nd thing is I have always used Nvidia and prefer their drivers... So...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Flameshot 14.0 Final by Razvan Serea Flameshot is a free and open-source, cross-platform tool to take screenshots with many built-in features to save you time. Using Flameshot is as simple as launching, dragging the selection box to cover the area you want to capture, making annotations as needed in on-screen and saving the shot to your computer, all with a very simple and straightforward interface. Flameshot allows users to simply upload their screenshots directly to the cloud in order to easily share it with others. You can upload your image directly to Imgur with a single click and share the URL with others. In-app screenshot editing - You can choose to add an arrow mark, highlight text, blur a section (blur or pixelate an area), add a text, draw something, add a rectangular/circular shaped border, add an incrementing counter number, and add a solid color box with Flameshot's built-in editing tools. Command-line interface (CLI) - Flameshot has several commands you can use in the terminal without launching the GUI via a command line interface. The command line interface lets you script Flameshot and use it as the subject of key binds. Flameshot 14.0 release notes: This release brings major improvements to multi-monitor support, fractional scaling support, new capture workflows, and a long list of bug fixes across all platforms. Changelog: New Multi-Monitor Capture Workflow New monitor selection screen before capture for better multi-monitor and mixed-scaling support. Option to auto-capture the monitor under the cursor (X11 & Windows). Tray menu can directly select a monitor. Linux Improvements XDG Desktop Portal is now the primary screenshot method. Added legacy X11 fallback option for minimal window managers. New D-Bus capture API for scripting and automation. Windows Enhancements Global screenshot hotkeys now supported (not limited to Print Screen). New portable mode stores settings next to the executable. Clipboard now always uses PNG format for better compatibility. CLI & Platform Updates Redesigned flameshot screen command with per-monitor capture support. Added native Nix Flake support. More compact launcher UI and improved update notifications. Major Fixes Multiple Wayland stability fixes, including KDE Plasma crash fixes. Clipboard compatibility improvements for GNOME, Wayland, X11, Windows, and macOS. Fixed D-Bus hangs, capture crashes, and HiDPI region issues. Other Changes Dropped Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal) support. Updated translations and build infrastructure. Intel macOS builds are no longer provided. [full release notes] Download: Flameshot 14.0 | 18.1 MB (Open Source) Download: Flameshot Portable | 53.0 MB Links: Flameshot Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 changelog: 0a4f1149 revision: bump to 4 (#1969) 4848de1f helium/core: enable the chromium screenshot feature (#1968) e0dec3f5 onboarding: integrate strings to i18n system (#1948) 417fa5bc i18n: fix newline parsing for onboarding 7a339b39 i18n: add foraged translations for onboarding 4f090cff i18n/generate: add handling for onboarding strings bfe48d58 i18n_apply: manually override parent grd logic for onboarding strings ab214e3c onboarding: bump in deps, wire up grdp afa6a059 helium/core: disable pdf infobar feature (#1965) eba585e7 helium/ui/vertical: fix new tab button alignment and icon size (#1964) 6ecfc9e0 helium/ui/tabs: fix horizontal tab hover background color (#1963) 3db87dc0 helium/ui/tabs: fix new tab button hover/press colors (#1962) 6bbdcc3e helium/ui: improve tab group UI in all layouts (#1961) 53deb314 helium/ui/tabs: enable tab group hover cards e93aece7 helium/ui/vertical: fix tab group appearance, prevent line overlap 629f5495 helium/ui/tabs: restore solid group header colors, enable new colors 961c962e helium/ui/tabs: move horiz tab group underline to bottom, make it thick c96deab6 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.155 (#1959) 36db56b4 i18n: update source.gen.json 5ce006ae patches: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.155 b4c1ea62 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.155 4e5e8671 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.155 08a3e7da helium/ui/layout: disable mute on collapsed vertical tabs (#1778) a0a5bbaf helium/core: simplify context menu and prevent huge widths (#1951) c4732aac devutils/i18n: add forage command (#1944) 11d16986 devutils/i18n: add an option to translate using local CLI tools (#1942) d820c3a2 i18n/prompt: tighten translation rules to prevent common errors (#1940) cf827007 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.114 6e3d5164 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!