Recommended Posts

Prove it slows it down, becuase the thing doesn't even run until you run a clickonce application... your source doesn't even say it slows down firefox.. and not to sound stupid, but um when I go into firefox its asking me if I WANT to install it... its giving it to me as a choice... it's not even installed for me and I have the latest .NET 3.5 SP1 and its patches also... that's what I am getting at least,but i installed firefox after the .net patches

I installed the DOT NET 3.5 SP1 after I had Firefox installed. I have been using Firefox since it was called Phoenix. I use Myway as a home page and it gives you the time it takes to load the page from starting Firefox. With that plugin the time was 0.69 seconds. With it remove it is 0.30 seconds. So you can see that Myway loads in less than one half the time without the plugin. Now the speed issue is not what bothers me, it is the fact that MS can and will install anything without the user even knowing about it. During the install there should be a warning from MS that this will add a plugin to Firfox or any other Browser that you use.

Blah blah blah. It's helpful - useful. If you don't "understant it" as you claim - then you had the ability to click cancel.

The point being made that it's not very communicative as to it's pupose, is a valid point - but you have obscured that point by using a provocative headline and a BS article...

And it would not slow down the browser when not used.

Basically, you're spouting crap you don't understand. Been pulled up on it. And then called everyone "fanboys". Well done!

Spam Much?

No, it's just that your claims are completely unfounded and, frankly, make you lose credibility on a tech forum. So what if .NET installed an extension designed to enhance your web experience? As other have said, this extension will be called whenever it is actually needed.

not to deviate off track here, but Gary, what xp theme is that? I love the blue.

It's a Windows Embedded theme. I'm using it on my XP box and I really like it. It's also signed by MS too, so there's nothing to modify if you want to use it. :D .

Here's a link to the page which describes it:

http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/09/another-s...-theme-emerges/

The download link is on that page as well.

it does nothing with the browser until the click once protocol is called... I'd love to see where you are getting this it slows down the browser from

if you really want rid of the thing, which is part of windows now to start with.....

Open Regedit (Start > Run > ?regedit?)

Goto ?HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mozilla\Firefox\extensions?

(or ?HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Mozilla\Firefox\extensions? for 64-bit versions of Windows

You?ll see ?{20a82645-c095-46ed-80e3-08825760534b}?. Right click it and click Delete.

Restart Firefox.

That is what I did.

It's a Windows Embedded theme. I'm using it on my XP box and I really like it. It's also signed by MS too, so there's nothing to modify if you want to use it. biggrin.gif .

I don't know, you will have to ask the Source. I use Vista and Win 7.

Oh please, Spyware? Malware? Don't be so absurd.

Next thing you'll be telling us Tracking Cookies are malware... Oh wait.

The only slight issue I see here is the Uninstall button being unavailiable, and while they should fix it, it's obviously not impossible to remove it as you have demonstrated.

you must have forgotten the part where MS can install anything they want to your windows machine, at any time, for any reason, without your consent.

all software/computers have that clause

Oh please, Spyware? Malware? Don't be so absurd.

Next thing you'll be telling us Tracking Cookies are malware... Oh wait.

The only slight issue I see here is the Uninstall button being unavailiable, and while they should fix it, it's obviously not impossible to remove it as you have demonstrated.

Take it up with the source, I only posted this as an aid in case someone wanted to remove it. I did not call it spyware, the source did. I only used his wording. Whatever it is , it is not right!

Microsoft adds a registry key, Firefox picks it up and uses it.

Should I be annoyed at MS for adding features or at Firefox for taking advantage of them?

If the installation of Firefox changed IE would MS be annoyed? Why does everything in this forum turn into an argument. Try to help and all I get is grief. This was posted in other forums and the results were of thanks and not the kind of BS that is here. But I degress this is Neowin.

Correct me if I'm wrong but... doesn't AVG install a plugin for Firefox? I'm not exactly sure if you can choose to install it or not, but I'm positive that you can't uninstall it from Firefox once it's in, unless you uninstall AVG.

I really don't care though as I just disable it...

Correct me if I'm wrong but... doesn't AVG install a plugin for Firefox? I'm not exactly sure if you can choose to install it or not, but I'm positive that you can't uninstall it from Firefox once it's in, unless you uninstall AVG.

I really don't care though as I just disable it...

I would not know as I do not run AVG.

If the installation of Firefox changed IE would MS be annoyed? Why does everything in this forum turn into an argument. Try to help and all I get is grief. This was posted in other forums and the results were of thanks and not the kind of BS that is here. But I degress this is Neowin.

Because people here understand you read and misunderstood something and then posting it thus spreading FUD..

Good grief why should Firefox users get the benefits of using .NET if they are using Windows?

Leave them out and hear the screams of WTF WHY IE ONLY?

Oh and I'm pretty sure Microsofts "Latest piece of spyware" will send your lunch habits back to Microsoft...

You should be scared!

Because people here understand you read and misunderstood something and then posting it thus spreading FUD..

Good grief why should Firefox users get the benefits of using .NET if they are using Windows?

Leave them out and hear the screams of WTF WHY IE ONLY?

Oh and I'm pretty sure Microsofts "Latest piece of spyware" will send your lunch habits back to Microsoft...

You should be scared!

It is FUD because you say it is FUD? No software from any company should install anything on a users computer without their knowledge.

Wow! Talk about being paranoid...

I'm going to be somewhat of a devil's advocate here and say that it's not being paranoid, but rather "outrage" against MS installing an Add On without permission from the user.

Edited by shift.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!