PS3 price cut just days away?


Recommended Posts

Rumor has it that Sony is ready to cut the PS3's price to $299 within a matter of days

GameDaily.com is reporting that Janco Partners analyst Mike Hickey has states that "recent channel checks indicate increased speculation for a PS3 price cut announcement from Sony in the next couple of days."

He also added ""Sony is meeting with retailers this week in Phoenix, where SCEA is holding its annual Destination Playstation conference. We think the company needs to reduce the current price by $100 to effectively restart unit velocity at retail"

It seems as if this rumor could be true. We'll keep you informed in the coming days.

Source: http://gamingfront.net/news/268/ps3-price-...just-days-away/

Funny thing is as I pointed out in the new PSP games topic, every rumour here [from a supposed SCE annual meeting] - http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2008/11/22/hug...y-info-blowout/ - has now come true apart from the PS3 cut in March.... and March is days away.

So a heads up, I wouldn't buy a PS3 over the next few days, even although KZ2 is just coming out :pinch:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/739966-ps3-price-cut-just-days-away/
Share on other sites

There is a million and 10 of these rumoured price drops, they never come true :(

So it's on, either you eat your words in ~ week, or you call it right :rofl:

And no, there hasn't quite been a million and 10 price drop topics yet, there's been a million and 10 FF7 remake topics.

OMG FF7 REMAKE PS3 BUNDLE @ $299

So early in the 10- year plan?

I thought Sony recently declared there would be no price drops on PS3. Are they desperate or were they lying?

They were responding to speculation or questions the journalists were asking them.

Business 101: You do not confirm a price drop months before it happens or you will sell absolutely no consoles till that date. Why would someone spend $400 when they can wait a month and spend $300? Think of how apple do it, announce new ipod updates at night and sell them in the morning.

Sony have always said they will review price in the future, people just went ###### up claiming that meant no price cuts. ever. Which was jaw droppingly stupid.

It would be a good idea to slash the price. Only problem I see is that it will place the PS3 real close to the PSP, and PS2. The difference in cost between devices is smaller than one would expect. Then again slashing all prices isn't a bad idea ;)

2009 will be a hard year for Sony to move units. Lowering the price is vital.

Source: http://gamingfront.net/news/268/ps3-price-...just-days-away/

Funny thing is as I pointed out in the new PSP games topic, every rumour here [from a supposed SCE annual meeting] - http://www.dpadmagazine.com/2008/11/22/hug...y-info-blowout/ - has now come true apart from the PS3 cut in March.... and March is days away.

So a heads up, I wouldn't buy a PS3 over the next few days, even although KZ2 is just coming out :pinch:

It doesn't make sense for them to drop price so close to KZ2 release (when is that?). It is supposedly a system seller so price drop will be useless in that period. If they drop "just after" the release, it might cause an out roar - possible returns.

Just my 2cents, doesn't really matter to me anyway. :)

It doesn't make sense for them to drop price so close to KZ2 release (when is that?). It is supposedly a system seller so price drop will be useless in that period. If they drop "just after" the release, it might cause an out roar - possible returns.

Just my 2cents, doesn't really matter to me anyway. :)

While this new analyst is saying "days away" don't take it too literally. Initial feedback in November 2008 from the SCE briefing says

Our source tells us that SCEE President David Reeves took to the stage to discuss the current economic climate and how it shouldn?t affect PlayStation business, though was quick to mention that SCEE will bgetting more competitive in price froMarch 2009 onwardsu>b>.

Fiscal year ends at the end of March I believe.

I thought Sony recently said no plans for price cuts in the coming future... About 2 weeks later, there are rumors of a price cut?

/more audio business 101 to help people out :p

Sony never say there will be no price cuts. It's always skirting the question claiming there is value as it stands, things may be looked at in the future as x, y or z happens. Journalists ask in nearly every interview regarding the PS3 now "When is the price dropping?" - Sony have to answer that, and they do it with PR reply #234. If you get asked a question, you need to answer it somehow, and if it's something not ready for public eyes/ears, time to hit vague street.

Don't people understand how damaging it is to give concrete info on when a price drop will happen? I've already said if you do, why on earth would anyone buy your console in the gap between now and the estimated time you gave if they can save hundreds of $ (especially if it's months away).

Can you imagine if Apple said "Hey guys, a new improved iPod is launching in 1~2 months, don't buy our current iPod any more or you'll blow your money on something out of date". For people who browse the internet and know their way around, they'll usually be a plethora of rumours till the launch of the new iPod about what it is/when it's coming, but Apple always manage to keep exact dates under wraps till very close to release.

The less consumers know about exact timing of price drops [or product revisions], the better it is for Sony.

Their answers are put out to play down imminent drops to encourage buyers that it's still a good time to buy a PS3 [hence why they keep touting VALUE VALUE VALUE], but at the same time the optimism of a price drop is always hinted at somewhat with comments like "we'll look at things in the future", or "when manufacturing costs are revised, we'll look into things".

You want people to keep buying right now, but you also want to throw a bone out there as you aren't daft, you know your console is the most expensive and hasn't received a cut since November 2007. It's a balancing act of sensibility and optimism.

Edited by Audioboxer
Could PS3 Deals Be Indicator of Looming Price Drop?

custom_1235581151227_photo_05.jpg

A friendly tipster sent in this picture they say they snagged at a GameStop showing that the national retailer will be offering a $50 gift certificate with any purchase of a new Playstation 3.

The deal, we're told, kicks off on March 3.

If you're not in the mood to wait, Best Buy is currently offering a $50 gift card and a copy of either Guitar Hero: Aerosmith or Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock when you by the 80GB PS3 for $400.

While the GameStop still should be taken with a grain of salt, if true both deals bolster recent rumblings of a Playstation 3 price drop.

In his latest note to investors

"Recent channel checks indicate increased speculation for a PS3 price cut announcement from Sony in the next couple of days," wrote Hickey.

Could the Best Buy and GameStop deals be predictors for an upcoming $100 price drop?

Source: http://kotaku.com/5160143/could-ps3-deals-...ming-price-drop

Those are some pretty good deals, especially Best Buys.

I'm pretty sure the 360 had similar deals in retail shortly before it's price drop - Retailers trying to encourage the purchase of a $400 system before it drops to say $300.

Industry analyst Mike Hickey of Janco Partners believes a PlayStation 3 price-cut is imminent. He embarrasses himself by claiming that it'll be the removal of the console's Blu-ray drive that'll help Sony make the cut.

In his latest industry note and posted on Gamedaily.com, Janco Partners analyst Mike Hickey reveals that a PlayStation 3 price-cut is probably-maybe on the way. He states that "recent channel checks indicate increased speculation for a PS3 price cut announcement from Sony in the next couple of days."

This in itself isn't laughable. I personally agree that all signs point to a PlayStation 3 price-cut sooner rather than later. In fact, I argued that April 2009 would be the perfect time for such a cut.

April will mark the end of Sony's 2008 fiscal-year, meaning a price-cut won't impact the Games Division's 2008 profits. A cut is likely to occur after March 31st since the company can make their losses up during the 2009 fiscal-year.

Unlike Hickey though, I don't believe the announcement will come in the next few days. Not only for the above reason, but because Sony will want to corner Killzone 2 consumers that will buy the console especially for the game. After they've made the jump, the price-cut can attract a whole new set of buyers.

However, what do I know? I'm no analyst! Hickey is, and he believes that the cut has already been brought to the attention of retailers:

"Sony is meeting with retailers this week in Phoenix, where SCEA is holding its annual Destination PlayStation conference. We think the company needs to reduce the current price by $100 to effectively restart unit velocity at retail."

This is perfectly fine, but Hickey believes that Sony will afford the cut with the following strategy:

"We are also hearing continued speculation that Sony is working on a non-Blu-ray PS3 console, which could enable them to make the aforementioned hardware price reduction."

A non-Blu-ray PlayStation 3? Riiight. That'd make sense, since who wants to buy a PlayStation 3 that plays Blu-ray films and...PlayStation 3 games!?

Perhaps Sony will begin releasing PS3 games on DVD's and Blu-rays. Or perhaps they're ahead of the game and will releases all of their titles digitally. Still, that leaves all previously released PlayStation 3 games in the lurch. 'Hey, buy the new cheap PlayStation 3 that can't play Metal Gear Solid 4, LittleBigPlanet or Killzone 2!'

What's a PlayStation 3 without a Blu-ray drive? Since it can't play PlayStation 3 or PlayStation 2 games - it's simply a PlayStation 1 that can play DVDs. Splendid. I'll buy one of those for ?40 please. Now that's a price-cut!

Nonetheless, Hickey does make a reasonable point by stating the obvious:

"We believe the market is expecting a PS3 price cut in April or by June (E3) at the latest, so a near term aggressive pricing decision by Sony could provide a positive catalyst for video game related stocks including GameStop, Activision and Take-Two Interactive.

"If Sony does not cut the price of their console, we expect the continuation of languishing PS3 hardware sales and the potential for publishers to accelerate their reallocation of resources away from the PS3 console."

It's a harsh warning to Sony, but we doubt they'll be removing the drive from the console that won the high-definition format war.

I also thought I'd bring your attention to an article from our friends at D+Pad magazine. Published in November, the article correctly details the God of War III trailer shown this month, as well as the existence of PSP versions of MotorStorm and LittleBigPlanet, which were only announced yesterday.

The significance of the article is that it also states that Sony will get more competitive on the PlayStation 3's price from March 2009 onwards. So don't be surprised when the cut comes at the end of next month.

Uh, no. This Hickey guy is an idiot.

well if price does drop i'll get one, but i got a question. Are the new PS3 backwards compatible with ps2/ps1 games? or are those the only early models?

Short answer is NO, I'm not sure if Sony will go into the whole BC anymore. Since it was a big deal when they decided to stop doing that with the new models year ago (not sure when).

If they do go into that again, I am pretty sure lot of people who bought the ps3 in the last year are not going to be happy. Lucky me I have one with BC and one without it :p.

well if price does drop i'll get one, but i got a question. Are the new PS3 backwards compatible with ps2/ps1 games? or are those the only early models?

Nope they removed it to cut costs, really low of Sony, they lower there costs and not the price.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!