Samuel L. Jackson Signs Nine Picture Deal with Marvel


Recommended Posts

Samuel L. Jackson is Marvel's man.

The actor, who just weeks ago was seemingly on the outs with the studio over reprising his role as Nick Fury, agent of spy outfit S.H.I.E.L.D., has signed an unprecedented nine-picture deal to play the character in a series of Marvel movies.

The movies include "Iron Man 2," "Thor," "Captain America," "The Avengers" and its sequels.

Also on the table is the possibility of toplining a "S.H.I.E.L.D." movie, which is in development.

The actor, repped by ICM and Anonymous Content, made a surprise appearance as Fury at the end of the first "Iron Man," throwing geeks into a tizzy and showing the first glimpse of Marvel's plan to link all their slate of movies into one filmic universe.

Jackson and Fury were expected to be part of the sequel, but as Marvel negotiated with its cast, deals proved hard to come by. Terrence Howard was replaced by Don Cheadle. Mickey Rourke still doesn't have a deal for the part of a villain despite almost two months of negotiations.

Source

By the time all the scripts are written, actors are found, cities are scouted, and the movies are ready to go, he'll be 80. Or all this super hero hype will have died down completely.

It's like signing a football player for 15 years 'cause he had one awesome season, then you get bored and try and trade him 3 years later. Hype now, woops later.

I really don't like him as an actor, he always comes off as playing the same character in every movie: himself.

Agree, even in the Star Was prequels, he was probably one of the worse performances. And it is not like those films had any award winning performances to begin with hehe. I just could never get into his character at all. He was not believable as a Jedi at all, it wouldn't have surprised me if when he came to arrest Palpatine he would have said "You're under arrest MOTHER****ER", like you said, he always seem to be the same character.

But he is a likable character usually. Much like Morgan Freeman who can do the same movies over and over yet you enjoy watching him.

although you will never see Freeman and Jackson in the same movie... yet. Then that would be badass!

Agree, even in the Star Was prequels, he was probably one of the worse performances. And it is not like those films had any award winning performances to begin with hehe. I just could never get into his character at all. He was not believable as a Jedi at all, it wouldn't have surprised me if when he came to arrest Palpatine he would have said "You're under arrest MOTHER****ER", like you said, he always seem to be the same character.

but that's what we like lol...i can't tell you how much I hoped he would have said that in Revenge of the Sith from pg-13 to rated R just because of one line lol.

He does end up being pretty much the same in every movie but watchable, problem these days is his movies are rubbish a lot of the time.

I'm still a bit annoyed how Don Cheadle replaced Terrence Howard. No need, he worked well in the first Iron Man.

Good for him I guess. But we need more great black actors like him. He's like in every movie with a black lead or supporting actor.

He was good in A Time To Kill.

Also Jackie Brown, Die Hard: With a Vengeance , Pulp Fiction, One Eight Seven and The Negotiator. Such awesome movies. He might be loosing his touch though.

  • 2 months later...
I really don't like him as an actor, he always comes off as playing the same character in every movie: himself.

Rent The movie Soul Men,With (rip) Bernie Mac and the late Issac Hayes. It is there last known film performances and Sam and Bernie have awesome chemistry.Bernie and Issac died 6 days apart and 6 weeks after filming warped.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!