Samuel L. Jackson Signs Nine Picture Deal with Marvel


Recommended Posts

Samuel L. Jackson is Marvel's man.

The actor, who just weeks ago was seemingly on the outs with the studio over reprising his role as Nick Fury, agent of spy outfit S.H.I.E.L.D., has signed an unprecedented nine-picture deal to play the character in a series of Marvel movies.

The movies include "Iron Man 2," "Thor," "Captain America," "The Avengers" and its sequels.

Also on the table is the possibility of toplining a "S.H.I.E.L.D." movie, which is in development.

The actor, repped by ICM and Anonymous Content, made a surprise appearance as Fury at the end of the first "Iron Man," throwing geeks into a tizzy and showing the first glimpse of Marvel's plan to link all their slate of movies into one filmic universe.

Jackson and Fury were expected to be part of the sequel, but as Marvel negotiated with its cast, deals proved hard to come by. Terrence Howard was replaced by Don Cheadle. Mickey Rourke still doesn't have a deal for the part of a villain despite almost two months of negotiations.

Source

By the time all the scripts are written, actors are found, cities are scouted, and the movies are ready to go, he'll be 80. Or all this super hero hype will have died down completely.

It's like signing a football player for 15 years 'cause he had one awesome season, then you get bored and try and trade him 3 years later. Hype now, woops later.

I really don't like him as an actor, he always comes off as playing the same character in every movie: himself.

Agree, even in the Star Was prequels, he was probably one of the worse performances. And it is not like those films had any award winning performances to begin with hehe. I just could never get into his character at all. He was not believable as a Jedi at all, it wouldn't have surprised me if when he came to arrest Palpatine he would have said "You're under arrest MOTHER****ER", like you said, he always seem to be the same character.

But he is a likable character usually. Much like Morgan Freeman who can do the same movies over and over yet you enjoy watching him.

although you will never see Freeman and Jackson in the same movie... yet. Then that would be badass!

Agree, even in the Star Was prequels, he was probably one of the worse performances. And it is not like those films had any award winning performances to begin with hehe. I just could never get into his character at all. He was not believable as a Jedi at all, it wouldn't have surprised me if when he came to arrest Palpatine he would have said "You're under arrest MOTHER****ER", like you said, he always seem to be the same character.

but that's what we like lol...i can't tell you how much I hoped he would have said that in Revenge of the Sith from pg-13 to rated R just because of one line lol.

He does end up being pretty much the same in every movie but watchable, problem these days is his movies are rubbish a lot of the time.

I'm still a bit annoyed how Don Cheadle replaced Terrence Howard. No need, he worked well in the first Iron Man.

Good for him I guess. But we need more great black actors like him. He's like in every movie with a black lead or supporting actor.

He was good in A Time To Kill.

Also Jackie Brown, Die Hard: With a Vengeance , Pulp Fiction, One Eight Seven and The Negotiator. Such awesome movies. He might be loosing his touch though.

  • 2 months later...
I really don't like him as an actor, he always comes off as playing the same character in every movie: himself.

Rent The movie Soul Men,With (rip) Bernie Mac and the late Issac Hayes. It is there last known film performances and Sam and Bernie have awesome chemistry.Bernie and Issac died 6 days apart and 6 weeks after filming warped.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!