Recommended Posts

Terrible idea with the buttons on the headphones.

Just another add-on apple will make you buy. They are really starting to get crazy with the add-ons you need for just basic functionality... computers and ipod wise.

Apple business model: lets make our standard products look slightly nicer than the competition, charge people through their rear ends, then drain their pocketbooks when they realize that their new overpriced product doesn't do everything the cheaper one does with more overpriced accessories.

Thank god for Chinese knockoffs

IMO this iPod with the controls on the headphones is best suited for the gym or running. Have you ever tried to use an iPod wheel while running? It isn't the easiest task in the world... while the iPhone / Ipod Touch has similar control features with the headphones, they are [iMO] too bulky to be used while running.

As far as the click controls, they aren't bad... I use the click controls on my iPhone to pause & skip when I'm just lounging around.

Triple click to play previous track... hahahahaha!

Wait, and that's only if you manage to triple-click the center button within the first 6 seconds of the song. If it's after that grace period, triple-clicking will only get you to the beginning of the song. Then you have to triple-click again within 6 seconds to go to the previous song.

6 clicks to play the previous track.

Because of this, you can't even use external speakers anymore. (I'll often pull out my external speakers at work and plug in my ipod) Good job Apple, this is just change for change sake.

It's all about segmentation, each product for a certain purpose. The shuffle is designed for running and similar activities, not as a media hub. Am I whining because the Touch doesn't fit in my jeans side pocket? Or because the Nano doesn't have a touchscreen?

And even if you do want to use it with external speakers there's an adapter that works with everything.

I hate the idea of the control on the headphone wire, especially so high up and especially with such a design that prevents you from using your own headphones (unless you have more money to pay out). Oh wait .. I can't even find an adapter on the Apple website. So they are forcing you to use their crappy headphones with it .. :/

I like the design of the unit itself, it's more subtle for clipping onto clothes and such. I never wanted my green shuffle clipped outside of my pockets screaming "look at my iPod, this is the best I can afford from the amazing Apple" (even though usage would be marginally easier). I just got a classic iPod though, and I love my 2nd gen shuffle, so I won't be buying this even if they did fix the controls.

IMO this iPod with the controls on the headphones is best suited for the gym or running. Have you ever tried to use an iPod wheel while running? It isn't the easiest task in the world... while the iPhone / Ipod Touch has similar control features with the headphones, they are [iMO] too bulky to be used while running.

As far as the click controls, they aren't bad... I use the click controls on my iPhone to pause & skip when I'm just lounging around.

Well I use the previous model in the gym and I find it to work perfectly. I can imagine headphone wires bouncing around too much on the treadmill. Trying to catch the control without yanking it out of your ear would be tough I think, or is that just me? It's very easy to put your hand to your pocket/waste band and press buttons on something that is not moving relative to your body.

you will be able to plug in an external speaker or off brand head phones because they have already stated that they are going to be releasing a dongle that will allow you to plug in other headphones and speakers it will simply be the controls on a dongle that you connect other devices into.

you will be able to plug in an external speaker or off brand head phones because they have already stated that they are going to be releasing a dongle that will allow you to plug in other headphones and speakers it will simply be the controls on a dongle that you connect other devices into.

So, in other words, you can't just buy a shuffle and use the headphones you already have. You have to buy a dongle for an additional $49 or whatever obscene amount Apple will charge. Because, of course, Apple couldn't be arsed just to bundle the dongle with the shuffle.

Next year's revision will be in one color and sell the clip as a "premium" for $99.

So, in other words, you can't just buy a shuffle and use the headphones you already have. You have to buy a dongle for an additional $49 or whatever obscene amount Apple will charge. Because, of course, Apple couldn't be arsed just to bundle the dongle with the shuffle.

You can, just not with this Shuffle model.

You won't HAVE to buy an adapter... as with other Apple products, there will be companies that create headphones that include the controls. It's only a matter of time.

Besides, this is only an issue for people that CHOOSE to buy this specific iPod. Continue to use your headphones with whatever iPod (or other device) you already have.

IMO this iPod with the controls on the headphones is best suited for the gym or running. Have you ever tried to use an iPod wheel while running? It isn't the easiest task in the world... while the iPhone / Ipod Touch has similar control features with the headphones, they are [iMO] too bulky to be used while running.

As far as the click controls, they aren't bad... I use the click controls on my iPhone to pause & skip when I'm just lounging around.

I'll give you that - it's best suited for running or working out; however the earbuds that Apple produces are crap - crap sound, and dunno about you, but the certainly do not stay in my ears when I am running.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!