Recommended Posts

Terrible idea with the buttons on the headphones.

Just another add-on apple will make you buy. They are really starting to get crazy with the add-ons you need for just basic functionality... computers and ipod wise.

Apple business model: lets make our standard products look slightly nicer than the competition, charge people through their rear ends, then drain their pocketbooks when they realize that their new overpriced product doesn't do everything the cheaper one does with more overpriced accessories.

Thank god for Chinese knockoffs

IMO this iPod with the controls on the headphones is best suited for the gym or running. Have you ever tried to use an iPod wheel while running? It isn't the easiest task in the world... while the iPhone / Ipod Touch has similar control features with the headphones, they are [iMO] too bulky to be used while running.

As far as the click controls, they aren't bad... I use the click controls on my iPhone to pause & skip when I'm just lounging around.

Triple click to play previous track... hahahahaha!

Wait, and that's only if you manage to triple-click the center button within the first 6 seconds of the song. If it's after that grace period, triple-clicking will only get you to the beginning of the song. Then you have to triple-click again within 6 seconds to go to the previous song.

6 clicks to play the previous track.

Because of this, you can't even use external speakers anymore. (I'll often pull out my external speakers at work and plug in my ipod) Good job Apple, this is just change for change sake.

It's all about segmentation, each product for a certain purpose. The shuffle is designed for running and similar activities, not as a media hub. Am I whining because the Touch doesn't fit in my jeans side pocket? Or because the Nano doesn't have a touchscreen?

And even if you do want to use it with external speakers there's an adapter that works with everything.

I hate the idea of the control on the headphone wire, especially so high up and especially with such a design that prevents you from using your own headphones (unless you have more money to pay out). Oh wait .. I can't even find an adapter on the Apple website. So they are forcing you to use their crappy headphones with it .. :/

I like the design of the unit itself, it's more subtle for clipping onto clothes and such. I never wanted my green shuffle clipped outside of my pockets screaming "look at my iPod, this is the best I can afford from the amazing Apple" (even though usage would be marginally easier). I just got a classic iPod though, and I love my 2nd gen shuffle, so I won't be buying this even if they did fix the controls.

IMO this iPod with the controls on the headphones is best suited for the gym or running. Have you ever tried to use an iPod wheel while running? It isn't the easiest task in the world... while the iPhone / Ipod Touch has similar control features with the headphones, they are [iMO] too bulky to be used while running.

As far as the click controls, they aren't bad... I use the click controls on my iPhone to pause & skip when I'm just lounging around.

Well I use the previous model in the gym and I find it to work perfectly. I can imagine headphone wires bouncing around too much on the treadmill. Trying to catch the control without yanking it out of your ear would be tough I think, or is that just me? It's very easy to put your hand to your pocket/waste band and press buttons on something that is not moving relative to your body.

you will be able to plug in an external speaker or off brand head phones because they have already stated that they are going to be releasing a dongle that will allow you to plug in other headphones and speakers it will simply be the controls on a dongle that you connect other devices into.

you will be able to plug in an external speaker or off brand head phones because they have already stated that they are going to be releasing a dongle that will allow you to plug in other headphones and speakers it will simply be the controls on a dongle that you connect other devices into.

So, in other words, you can't just buy a shuffle and use the headphones you already have. You have to buy a dongle for an additional $49 or whatever obscene amount Apple will charge. Because, of course, Apple couldn't be arsed just to bundle the dongle with the shuffle.

Next year's revision will be in one color and sell the clip as a "premium" for $99.

So, in other words, you can't just buy a shuffle and use the headphones you already have. You have to buy a dongle for an additional $49 or whatever obscene amount Apple will charge. Because, of course, Apple couldn't be arsed just to bundle the dongle with the shuffle.

You can, just not with this Shuffle model.

You won't HAVE to buy an adapter... as with other Apple products, there will be companies that create headphones that include the controls. It's only a matter of time.

Besides, this is only an issue for people that CHOOSE to buy this specific iPod. Continue to use your headphones with whatever iPod (or other device) you already have.

IMO this iPod with the controls on the headphones is best suited for the gym or running. Have you ever tried to use an iPod wheel while running? It isn't the easiest task in the world... while the iPhone / Ipod Touch has similar control features with the headphones, they are [iMO] too bulky to be used while running.

As far as the click controls, they aren't bad... I use the click controls on my iPhone to pause & skip when I'm just lounging around.

I'll give you that - it's best suited for running or working out; however the earbuds that Apple produces are crap - crap sound, and dunno about you, but the certainly do not stay in my ears when I am running.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!