-
Posts
-
By George P · Posted
The best thing would be to just allow more options to let users pick the layout they like, it doesn't matter at this point really and it's not that hard to do as evidenced but all the 3rd party menus/tools that let you change it in lots of different ways. If you give the users more options they'll be happy, take them away and you have a problem. -
By George P · Posted
They could've done that the very next day or from the start but when Win11 came out, the MSN team was still rooted in the OS division and pushing for it's hooks into everything. That's why we have recommended and all the MSN feed stuff in the widget panel which you also couldn't turn off at the start. Now that they've been pushed out, last I checked, all this MSN/web feed junk is finally getting the option to be turned off. tl/dr, it's not about coding ability, it's just dumb business decisions. -
By Captain_Eric · Posted
The headline doesn't fit the article. Sure the headline is more enticing probably, but come on, man. Keep it real, if you can help it. -
By George P · Posted
The console sales don't mean much like they used to. Sony tells you this themselves but you seem to miss it. They care more about MAUs and how many people they can milk each month than x number of consoles sold, often to the more casual COD, Madden or FiFA gamers who play little else. Sony can't seem to port their games to the PC fast enough because they're not getting enough out of that 75 million console sales it seems. The traditional home console market has stagnated already, everyone knows it. -
By +sphbecker · Posted
That is fair, I meant the comment somewhat whimsically and as such was a bit careless with the facts. Had I said either 2 or 4 that would be more defensible. SpaceX's Starship crashed 2 times during hop tests and 2 additional hop-test failures that while not exactly a "crash," still resulted in the total destruction of the test vehicle. Even in that example, it would still be fair for you to point out that Starship is a significantly more complex test vehicle and that SpaceX never crashed a simple rocket hop-test like this one. I already admitted that I could have been clearer, but I also don't think it unreasonable to use the word "it" when referring to the subject of the article I am commenting on. I feel like it is an outlying read of my words to assume "it" meant SpaceX's total success. Like I said, I accept responsibility for the ambiguity.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
slackerzz earned a badge
Week One Done
-
vivetool earned a badge
Week One Done
-
pnajbar earned a badge
Reacting Well
-
TBithoney earned a badge
Week One Done
-
xuxlix earned a badge
First Post
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
)
Recommended Posts