Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

Sweet, thanks. Even though that res will kill me PC, I shall watch the slideshow with satisfaction indeed!

http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2010/6/28/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-trailer-now-online - more direct links can be found there :)

  • Like 2

Some extra rep for you my friend!

But, SPlayer used GPU acc. and I had no problem running the 1080p version, even though I'm running at 1024 res. Shame, but I saw way more detail and it was even more amazing to see it like that. I'm seriously going to go to the theater and watch it in 3D just because. It'll be the first movie I see in 3D too.

Saw the trailer today the minute i turned on my TV and I have to say, ****ING EPIC.

been waiting for ever for this movie. I cant even wait for november. The 3D wasnt neccessary but since these 2 movies are suppose to be majority of action, then im VERY hAPPY they did 3D. Now I can enjoy the movie even more and trip after the movie lol.

Either way, CANT WAIT. VOLDAMORT NEEDS TO DIE

I'm excited to see the movie, I guess. I loved the last book, but I'm curious to know how they plan on breaking up the book into two films. I don't remember a clear breaking point in the story where they could stop a movie.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

Actually I think it's great that they changed it because the final show down in the book was completely disappointing and cheesy in my opinion.

Actually I think it's great that they changed it because the final show down in the book was completely disappointing and cheesy in my opinion.

I guess it comes down to opinion. But I thought that the way it was described in the book, with everyone watching the duel, was epic. The way the trailer made it seem was that it is going to be an isolated duel. Which, to me, makes it less exciting. But I'm sure I'll love it anyway whenever I get around to watching it. I'll just be disappointed if that's the way they go.

I guess it comes down to opinion. But I thought that the way it was described in the book, with everyone watching the duel, was epic. The way the trailer made it seem was that it is going to be an isolated duel. Which, to me, makes it less exciting. But I'm sure I'll love it anyway whenever I get around to watching it. I'll just be disappointed if that's the way they go.

Oh, you mean that, I thought you meant the fact that their spells collide for a while which didn't happen in the book, as for the crowd. I guess there might be some people watching the duel but they weren't shown in the trailer (from this angle I mean), it makes sense tbh, since the spells could be huge so everyone will be standing far away.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

I also liked the original book ending better, than the way it seems to be shown in the movie, but it looks like Yates likes to change stuff from the book even if it's not necessary.

I also liked the original book ending better, than the way it seems to be shown in the movie, but it looks like Yates likes to change stuff from the book even if it's not necessary.

Let's not rush things here, a ~4 sec footage in a trailer doesn't indicate anything.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!