Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

Sweet, thanks. Even though that res will kill me PC, I shall watch the slideshow with satisfaction indeed!

http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2010/6/28/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-trailer-now-online - more direct links can be found there :)

  • Like 2

Some extra rep for you my friend!

But, SPlayer used GPU acc. and I had no problem running the 1080p version, even though I'm running at 1024 res. Shame, but I saw way more detail and it was even more amazing to see it like that. I'm seriously going to go to the theater and watch it in 3D just because. It'll be the first movie I see in 3D too.

Saw the trailer today the minute i turned on my TV and I have to say, ****ING EPIC.

been waiting for ever for this movie. I cant even wait for november. The 3D wasnt neccessary but since these 2 movies are suppose to be majority of action, then im VERY hAPPY they did 3D. Now I can enjoy the movie even more and trip after the movie lol.

Either way, CANT WAIT. VOLDAMORT NEEDS TO DIE

I'm excited to see the movie, I guess. I loved the last book, but I'm curious to know how they plan on breaking up the book into two films. I don't remember a clear breaking point in the story where they could stop a movie.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

Actually I think it's great that they changed it because the final show down in the book was completely disappointing and cheesy in my opinion.

Actually I think it's great that they changed it because the final show down in the book was completely disappointing and cheesy in my opinion.

I guess it comes down to opinion. But I thought that the way it was described in the book, with everyone watching the duel, was epic. The way the trailer made it seem was that it is going to be an isolated duel. Which, to me, makes it less exciting. But I'm sure I'll love it anyway whenever I get around to watching it. I'll just be disappointed if that's the way they go.

I guess it comes down to opinion. But I thought that the way it was described in the book, with everyone watching the duel, was epic. The way the trailer made it seem was that it is going to be an isolated duel. Which, to me, makes it less exciting. But I'm sure I'll love it anyway whenever I get around to watching it. I'll just be disappointed if that's the way they go.

Oh, you mean that, I thought you meant the fact that their spells collide for a while which didn't happen in the book, as for the crowd. I guess there might be some people watching the duel but they weren't shown in the trailer (from this angle I mean), it makes sense tbh, since the spells could be huge so everyone will be standing far away.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

I also liked the original book ending better, than the way it seems to be shown in the movie, but it looks like Yates likes to change stuff from the book even if it's not necessary.

I also liked the original book ending better, than the way it seems to be shown in the movie, but it looks like Yates likes to change stuff from the book even if it's not necessary.

Let's not rush things here, a ~4 sec footage in a trailer doesn't indicate anything.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!