Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

Sweet, thanks. Even though that res will kill me PC, I shall watch the slideshow with satisfaction indeed!

http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2010/6/28/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-trailer-now-online - more direct links can be found there :)

  • Like 2

Some extra rep for you my friend!

But, SPlayer used GPU acc. and I had no problem running the 1080p version, even though I'm running at 1024 res. Shame, but I saw way more detail and it was even more amazing to see it like that. I'm seriously going to go to the theater and watch it in 3D just because. It'll be the first movie I see in 3D too.

Saw the trailer today the minute i turned on my TV and I have to say, ****ING EPIC.

been waiting for ever for this movie. I cant even wait for november. The 3D wasnt neccessary but since these 2 movies are suppose to be majority of action, then im VERY hAPPY they did 3D. Now I can enjoy the movie even more and trip after the movie lol.

Either way, CANT WAIT. VOLDAMORT NEEDS TO DIE

I'm excited to see the movie, I guess. I loved the last book, but I'm curious to know how they plan on breaking up the book into two films. I don't remember a clear breaking point in the story where they could stop a movie.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

Actually I think it's great that they changed it because the final show down in the book was completely disappointing and cheesy in my opinion.

Actually I think it's great that they changed it because the final show down in the book was completely disappointing and cheesy in my opinion.

I guess it comes down to opinion. But I thought that the way it was described in the book, with everyone watching the duel, was epic. The way the trailer made it seem was that it is going to be an isolated duel. Which, to me, makes it less exciting. But I'm sure I'll love it anyway whenever I get around to watching it. I'll just be disappointed if that's the way they go.

I guess it comes down to opinion. But I thought that the way it was described in the book, with everyone watching the duel, was epic. The way the trailer made it seem was that it is going to be an isolated duel. Which, to me, makes it less exciting. But I'm sure I'll love it anyway whenever I get around to watching it. I'll just be disappointed if that's the way they go.

Oh, you mean that, I thought you meant the fact that their spells collide for a while which didn't happen in the book, as for the crowd. I guess there might be some people watching the duel but they weren't shown in the trailer (from this angle I mean), it makes sense tbh, since the spells could be huge so everyone will be standing far away.

Also, if the shot of Voldemort and Harry dueling in the rubble is supposed to be the final show down at the end of the book, then they got it completely wrong. And if that is the case, then I'm going to be ****ed. I've been looking forward to seeing what they would do with that scene ever since the movies starting getting better.

I also liked the original book ending better, than the way it seems to be shown in the movie, but it looks like Yates likes to change stuff from the book even if it's not necessary.

I also liked the original book ending better, than the way it seems to be shown in the movie, but it looks like Yates likes to change stuff from the book even if it's not necessary.

Let's not rush things here, a ~4 sec footage in a trailer doesn't indicate anything.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!