Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

A member of the "Harry Potter Forum" sent the MPAA an email asking for the content rating of DH1 and they informed him that it will be rated PG-13 for some sequences of intense action violence and frightening images, the rating should be available on their site on Wednesday.

this flim looks as thought it might be the best of the films however, sadly it was the worst book :p

Come again?

I agree that it was by no means the best book in the series, but hardly the worst. Although ill say this, it pales in comparison after the awesomeness that was book 6 (not movie 6). That my friends was great storytelling.

For me, the weakest has got to be book 4 (and isnt it the longest?).

6>3>2>5>7>1>4.

Strange, aint it?

Come again?

I agree that it was by no means the best book in the series, but hardly the worst. Although ill say this, it pales in comparison after the awesomeness that was book 6 (not movie 6). That my friends was great storytelling.

For me, the weakest has got to be book 4 (and isnt it the longest?).

6>3>2>5>7>1>4.

Strange, aint it?

I loved the last book, people complain about the first part being boring, but it just builds up expectations for the finale and when it starts (halfway through the book if I remember correctly) its just epic. I remember when reading it the first time I read the whole finale in one loooooong session.

Personally I think DH is the most cinematic book of them all and even with the camping part in the middle of the story it still has plenty of action much more than any other book in the series and it doesn't have many pointless subplots as the others did.

International release dates Now available:

http://www.facebook.com/harrypottermovie?v=app_159258310759200&ref=ts

I'm seeing it on November 7, woohooo!

Warner Bros scraps plans to release DH Part 1 in 3d

Warner Bros Pictures has made the decision to release "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1" in 2D, in both conventional and IMAX theaters, as we will not have a completed 3D version of the film within our release date window.

"Despite everyone's best efforts, we were unable to convert the film in its entirety and meet the highest standards of quality. We do not want to disappoint fans who have long-anticipated the conclusion of this extraordinary journey, and to that end, we are releasing our film day-and-date on November 19, 2010 as planned. We, in alignment with our filmmakers, believe this is the best course to take in order to ensure that our audiences enjoy the consummate 'Harry Potter' experience.

Producer David Heyman said, "For 10 years, we have worked alongside Alan Horn and the studio, whose priority has always been to preserve the integrity of Jo Rowling's books as we have adapted them to the screen, and this decision reflects that commitment."

Director David Yates continued, "This decision, which we completely support, underscores the fact that Warner Bros. has always put quality first."

As scheduled, on July 15, 2011, we will deliver to conventional and IMAX theaters our final installment of the film franchise, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2," in both 2D and 3D formats.

Source: Mugglenet

While I would have liked to see a potter film in 3d, I'm glad WB didn't go down the clash of the titans route with DH and released a crappy 3d converted film, respectful move I must say. But now I doubt that DH part 1 will pass 1 billion in total gross.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Very fitting name since AI users have air where there brains should be.
    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      532
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!