Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

A member of the "Harry Potter Forum" sent the MPAA an email asking for the content rating of DH1 and they informed him that it will be rated PG-13 for some sequences of intense action violence and frightening images, the rating should be available on their site on Wednesday.

this flim looks as thought it might be the best of the films however, sadly it was the worst book :p

Come again?

I agree that it was by no means the best book in the series, but hardly the worst. Although ill say this, it pales in comparison after the awesomeness that was book 6 (not movie 6). That my friends was great storytelling.

For me, the weakest has got to be book 4 (and isnt it the longest?).

6>3>2>5>7>1>4.

Strange, aint it?

Come again?

I agree that it was by no means the best book in the series, but hardly the worst. Although ill say this, it pales in comparison after the awesomeness that was book 6 (not movie 6). That my friends was great storytelling.

For me, the weakest has got to be book 4 (and isnt it the longest?).

6>3>2>5>7>1>4.

Strange, aint it?

I loved the last book, people complain about the first part being boring, but it just builds up expectations for the finale and when it starts (halfway through the book if I remember correctly) its just epic. I remember when reading it the first time I read the whole finale in one loooooong session.

Personally I think DH is the most cinematic book of them all and even with the camping part in the middle of the story it still has plenty of action much more than any other book in the series and it doesn't have many pointless subplots as the others did.

International release dates Now available:

http://www.facebook.com/harrypottermovie?v=app_159258310759200&ref=ts

I'm seeing it on November 7, woohooo!

Warner Bros scraps plans to release DH Part 1 in 3d

Warner Bros Pictures has made the decision to release "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1" in 2D, in both conventional and IMAX theaters, as we will not have a completed 3D version of the film within our release date window.

"Despite everyone's best efforts, we were unable to convert the film in its entirety and meet the highest standards of quality. We do not want to disappoint fans who have long-anticipated the conclusion of this extraordinary journey, and to that end, we are releasing our film day-and-date on November 19, 2010 as planned. We, in alignment with our filmmakers, believe this is the best course to take in order to ensure that our audiences enjoy the consummate 'Harry Potter' experience.

Producer David Heyman said, "For 10 years, we have worked alongside Alan Horn and the studio, whose priority has always been to preserve the integrity of Jo Rowling's books as we have adapted them to the screen, and this decision reflects that commitment."

Director David Yates continued, "This decision, which we completely support, underscores the fact that Warner Bros. has always put quality first."

As scheduled, on July 15, 2011, we will deliver to conventional and IMAX theaters our final installment of the film franchise, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2," in both 2D and 3D formats.

Source: Mugglenet

While I would have liked to see a potter film in 3d, I'm glad WB didn't go down the clash of the titans route with DH and released a crappy 3d converted film, respectful move I must say. But now I doubt that DH part 1 will pass 1 billion in total gross.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      257
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!