Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Film)


Recommended Posts

A member of the "Harry Potter Forum" sent the MPAA an email asking for the content rating of DH1 and they informed him that it will be rated PG-13 for some sequences of intense action violence and frightening images, the rating should be available on their site on Wednesday.

this flim looks as thought it might be the best of the films however, sadly it was the worst book :p

Come again?

I agree that it was by no means the best book in the series, but hardly the worst. Although ill say this, it pales in comparison after the awesomeness that was book 6 (not movie 6). That my friends was great storytelling.

For me, the weakest has got to be book 4 (and isnt it the longest?).

6>3>2>5>7>1>4.

Strange, aint it?

Come again?

I agree that it was by no means the best book in the series, but hardly the worst. Although ill say this, it pales in comparison after the awesomeness that was book 6 (not movie 6). That my friends was great storytelling.

For me, the weakest has got to be book 4 (and isnt it the longest?).

6>3>2>5>7>1>4.

Strange, aint it?

I loved the last book, people complain about the first part being boring, but it just builds up expectations for the finale and when it starts (halfway through the book if I remember correctly) its just epic. I remember when reading it the first time I read the whole finale in one loooooong session.

Personally I think DH is the most cinematic book of them all and even with the camping part in the middle of the story it still has plenty of action much more than any other book in the series and it doesn't have many pointless subplots as the others did.

International release dates Now available:

http://www.facebook.com/harrypottermovie?v=app_159258310759200&ref=ts

I'm seeing it on November 7, woohooo!

Warner Bros scraps plans to release DH Part 1 in 3d

Warner Bros Pictures has made the decision to release "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1" in 2D, in both conventional and IMAX theaters, as we will not have a completed 3D version of the film within our release date window.

"Despite everyone's best efforts, we were unable to convert the film in its entirety and meet the highest standards of quality. We do not want to disappoint fans who have long-anticipated the conclusion of this extraordinary journey, and to that end, we are releasing our film day-and-date on November 19, 2010 as planned. We, in alignment with our filmmakers, believe this is the best course to take in order to ensure that our audiences enjoy the consummate 'Harry Potter' experience.

Producer David Heyman said, "For 10 years, we have worked alongside Alan Horn and the studio, whose priority has always been to preserve the integrity of Jo Rowling's books as we have adapted them to the screen, and this decision reflects that commitment."

Director David Yates continued, "This decision, which we completely support, underscores the fact that Warner Bros. has always put quality first."

As scheduled, on July 15, 2011, we will deliver to conventional and IMAX theaters our final installment of the film franchise, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2," in both 2D and 3D formats.

Source: Mugglenet

While I would have liked to see a potter film in 3d, I'm glad WB didn't go down the clash of the titans route with DH and released a crappy 3d converted film, respectful move I must say. But now I doubt that DH part 1 will pass 1 billion in total gross.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!