After Shift


Recommended Posts

You've probably heard about Firefly Linux, so I won't spam about that anymore.

Shift Linux was a "learner's distro" - not in the sense of dumbed down K-12 programs, but in the practical sense of I want a Linux distro of my own. Not many mainstream vendors have a clear-cut, well-documented way to do so yourself.

Having built (installable for the most part) Linux Live CDs on 3 (4?) different platforms - Morphix/(Debian), Ubuntu, and Arch Linux, and in good community and continuation of Shift's learning element, I've come up with an idea for a user-guide on how to build Linux (distributions). Think of this post as a pre-announcement. Let's not bury knowledge.

The guide will cleverly be called "Build Linux", slogan pending, and the domain, already registered, will be http://buildlinux.com. I'm contemplating using MediaWiki to power the site. That means users will be able to submit guides and modify existing guides as distributions change and such. Our first three guides will obviously be about the 3 Shift distros. We'll probably shoot some emails out to the writers of LFS to see if we can include their guides on Build Linux.com.

Before you tear this idea apart, keep in mind that there are people out there searching for a way to make Linux distros beyond what UCK and Reconstructor do, or, even if they do use the easier wizard applications, easier documentation isn't always easily found.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/
Share on other sites

This is what I don't understand. Why do people feel the need to make their own distro? Why aren't the 1000s of ones already availible good enough? If you know enough about linux to create your own distro, you certainly can install a current distro and easily retool it for your needs. Lord knows the linux platform doesn't need anymore segmentation.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590800094
Share on other sites

We're not making another distro. And yes, if you know enough to make your own distro, you can retool one. We tackle the "know enough to make your own distro" part, which in turn might get people to retool their distro, or yes, dump it on the saturated market. If it is released, good for the developer, and unless that distro gets popular enough, people won't really know unless they go searching for themselves. There's a good 2000 distros out there, but no one honestly cares about how many there are. They care about the select few that fit their needs and ignore the rest.

Sorry for the rant. My original point was - this is a documentation site. What the end users do with the information is out of my control - open source. Don't expect 10000 more distros to suddenly slam DistroWatch. But maybe some people will "slipstream" something into their favorite Linux distro?

nLite and vLite could therefore theoretically create 2000 "distributions" of Windows, right?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590800166
Share on other sites

We're not making another distro. And yes, if you know enough to make your own distro, you can retool one. We tackle the "know enough to make your own distro" part, which in turn might get people to retool their distro, or yes, dump it on the saturated market. If it is released, good for the developer, and unless that distro gets popular enough, people won't really know unless they go searching for themselves. There's a good 2000 distros out there, but no one honestly cares about how many there are. They care about the select few that fit their needs and ignore the rest.

Sorry for the rant. My original point was - this is a documentation site. What the end users do with the information is out of my control - open source. Don't expect 10000 more distros to suddenly slam DistroWatch. But maybe some people will "slipstream" something into their favorite Linux distro?

nLite and vLite could therefore theoretically create 2000 "distributions" of Windows, right?

I'm sorry. Perhaps I went a bit off target for this thread with my rant. My rant was a bit more general.

I find the idea of creating new distros to be much like that of pollution, people can do it, and it may have an immediate good result, but in the long run, damages the community as a whole. Its one of the main reasons linux gets so little support from the main stream. There?s so many combinations of glib versions and mono versions and god-knows-what-else-dependencies out there that theres an unlimited amount of variation. Developers cant possibly support every linux distro out there(even the most popular ones) and so they don?t support any at all.

And I was thinking about nLite and vLite when I was typing that last post. And you?d be right, except people don?t freely distribute slipstreamed disks. Windows(and OS X) has a standard that developers can target, the original install disk. Yeah, you can add and remove stuff using nLite and vLite, but that?s your own personal copy, if you screw up something that a program relies on and it doesn?t work, you would know why, you created the disk. But people who install your distro won?t know, they didn?t create the disk.

I guess what I?m getting at is it?s fine to create your own distro for personal use, but when you release your distro to the public, you?re really doing a disservice to the linux community.

Sorry for the rant again. I know, it?s not your problem/fault. Don?t let my rant get in the way of your project, it was aimed more at the community than you specificly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590800356
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
While I love Linux and what it represents, there are too many distros. :(

I think the point is you can learn to make your own distro, with the software you want and the themes you want and all the settings you want, so it works exactly the way you want it "out of the box".

Or you could also start your own distro targeting a specific audience.

Nice one, Crimson! :D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590898648
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!