After Shift


Recommended Posts

You've probably heard about Firefly Linux, so I won't spam about that anymore.

Shift Linux was a "learner's distro" - not in the sense of dumbed down K-12 programs, but in the practical sense of I want a Linux distro of my own. Not many mainstream vendors have a clear-cut, well-documented way to do so yourself.

Having built (installable for the most part) Linux Live CDs on 3 (4?) different platforms - Morphix/(Debian), Ubuntu, and Arch Linux, and in good community and continuation of Shift's learning element, I've come up with an idea for a user-guide on how to build Linux (distributions). Think of this post as a pre-announcement. Let's not bury knowledge.

The guide will cleverly be called "Build Linux", slogan pending, and the domain, already registered, will be http://buildlinux.com. I'm contemplating using MediaWiki to power the site. That means users will be able to submit guides and modify existing guides as distributions change and such. Our first three guides will obviously be about the 3 Shift distros. We'll probably shoot some emails out to the writers of LFS to see if we can include their guides on Build Linux.com.

Before you tear this idea apart, keep in mind that there are people out there searching for a way to make Linux distros beyond what UCK and Reconstructor do, or, even if they do use the easier wizard applications, easier documentation isn't always easily found.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/
Share on other sites

This is what I don't understand. Why do people feel the need to make their own distro? Why aren't the 1000s of ones already availible good enough? If you know enough about linux to create your own distro, you certainly can install a current distro and easily retool it for your needs. Lord knows the linux platform doesn't need anymore segmentation.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590800094
Share on other sites

We're not making another distro. And yes, if you know enough to make your own distro, you can retool one. We tackle the "know enough to make your own distro" part, which in turn might get people to retool their distro, or yes, dump it on the saturated market. If it is released, good for the developer, and unless that distro gets popular enough, people won't really know unless they go searching for themselves. There's a good 2000 distros out there, but no one honestly cares about how many there are. They care about the select few that fit their needs and ignore the rest.

Sorry for the rant. My original point was - this is a documentation site. What the end users do with the information is out of my control - open source. Don't expect 10000 more distros to suddenly slam DistroWatch. But maybe some people will "slipstream" something into their favorite Linux distro?

nLite and vLite could therefore theoretically create 2000 "distributions" of Windows, right?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590800166
Share on other sites

We're not making another distro. And yes, if you know enough to make your own distro, you can retool one. We tackle the "know enough to make your own distro" part, which in turn might get people to retool their distro, or yes, dump it on the saturated market. If it is released, good for the developer, and unless that distro gets popular enough, people won't really know unless they go searching for themselves. There's a good 2000 distros out there, but no one honestly cares about how many there are. They care about the select few that fit their needs and ignore the rest.

Sorry for the rant. My original point was - this is a documentation site. What the end users do with the information is out of my control - open source. Don't expect 10000 more distros to suddenly slam DistroWatch. But maybe some people will "slipstream" something into their favorite Linux distro?

nLite and vLite could therefore theoretically create 2000 "distributions" of Windows, right?

I'm sorry. Perhaps I went a bit off target for this thread with my rant. My rant was a bit more general.

I find the idea of creating new distros to be much like that of pollution, people can do it, and it may have an immediate good result, but in the long run, damages the community as a whole. Its one of the main reasons linux gets so little support from the main stream. There?s so many combinations of glib versions and mono versions and god-knows-what-else-dependencies out there that theres an unlimited amount of variation. Developers cant possibly support every linux distro out there(even the most popular ones) and so they don?t support any at all.

And I was thinking about nLite and vLite when I was typing that last post. And you?d be right, except people don?t freely distribute slipstreamed disks. Windows(and OS X) has a standard that developers can target, the original install disk. Yeah, you can add and remove stuff using nLite and vLite, but that?s your own personal copy, if you screw up something that a program relies on and it doesn?t work, you would know why, you created the disk. But people who install your distro won?t know, they didn?t create the disk.

I guess what I?m getting at is it?s fine to create your own distro for personal use, but when you release your distro to the public, you?re really doing a disservice to the linux community.

Sorry for the rant again. I know, it?s not your problem/fault. Don?t let my rant get in the way of your project, it was aimed more at the community than you specificly.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590800356
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
While I love Linux and what it represents, there are too many distros. :(

I think the point is you can learn to make your own distro, with the software you want and the themes you want and all the settings you want, so it works exactly the way you want it "out of the box".

Or you could also start your own distro targeting a specific audience.

Nice one, Crimson! :D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/754798-after-shift/#findComment-590898648
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!