2010 Mazda3 5-door (hatchback). Good or Bad?


Recommended Posts

I am going to buy a new car (says on the title), but does anyone have problem with this vehicle?

my other options are VW GTi and Mini Cooper but my friends said they have heard nothing but problems.

I need opinions before i purchase the car. (for those who owns Mazda vehicles)

thanks

I don't have a Mazda; but I would generally say it's good because it has comparably cheaper insurance, good quality, fun to drive, and has a pretty decent interior. What I don't like about is that front (Seriously, who designed it?), relatively poor resale value for a Japanese branded vehicle, and so-so fuel economy.

I don't think the GT trim really compares against the GTI though. Mazda's MT setups are also not that spectacular either imo.

I bought my wife a Mini recently, the overall ergonomics are just awful, getting into a comfortable driving position is very hard for me, and there seems to be an intermittent glitch with the auto-down windows.

Engine is great. Very fun to drive. Much better handling than you would expect. Makes a great daily driver but still keeps you grinning.

I've never driven any of the other cars so I can't comment.

as an owner of a 2004 Mazda3 hatch, I've never had any problems with my car - just normal maintenance (oil change, tire change, etc)

If you can grin and bear with the smilie grille, then it could be a good car.

What I don't like about it is that there's no tray under the cargo cover - just the spare tire.

  • 4 months later...

Mazda are pretty good cars and it has good value, pretty reliable. However, if you are looking for something with a little more "luxurious/european" interior feeling the VW GTi will do that for you. If you are looking for fun to drive the GTi will do that better than the Mazda. The Mini does it best, as it's the funnest car to drive of all 3. Back to reliability, I would say Mazda only because VW still has a poorer track record than Mazda for reliability despite much better improvements. Minis after 2006/7 have been much more reliable.

In case my thoughts are coming out jumbled - here you go: If you are looking for a reliable car without too much luxurious feeling ot it - go Mazda. If you have a larger budget, you want a more luxurious feeling interior, GTi recognition and a funner car to drive, go with the GTi. If you are all aout the driving experience then go with the Mini. To me, the GTi is the blend between Mazda and the Mini.

  • 3 weeks later...

Between a 3, mini, and a GTI get the mark6 GTI.

I was considering the 3 too but after seing it in person, I think it looks awful. The smiley face is bad, but the rear design is even worse.

The mark6 GTI has plenty of class and refinement. The mini is not for me, it's like a little toy car.

I am waiting for the GTI to be released this fall.

  • 10 months later...

How could you compare the Mazda 3 to the VW GTI? First off, while the Mazda 3 may be a reliable car, it's absolutely hideous. I mean, wow. How could they have released such a monstrosity of a car to the public.

The GTI on the other hand, is a very pretty car for $21,000. It's fast, reliable, and most definitely fun. You can't compare the GTI to a regular Mazda 3 though. It would only be fair to compare it to the Mazdaspeed 3. You can however compare the regular VW Golf to the Mazda 3 in which case it wins in everything.

Buy a Golf or a Jetta man. You won't regret it.

With the MkVI Golf (and GTI they supposedly worked out all the electrical gremlins that plagued the past model (though honestly still weren't that bad). The GTI will be more refined, better built, and hold it's value better than a mazda.

What he said.

It is a good choice man. I bought a hatchback just early this year and i am enjoying this new ride of mine. Its wonderful to drive.

________________

SG

just upgraded my mazda auto parts :D

It may be wonderful to drive, until you step outside and have a look at it :whistle: :D

Whilst I haven't owned any of these I am looking in this area as well and at the same/similar cars. From speaking to friends and people who own them:

Mini: I just don't like these. Noisy power steering pump (wines like mad) Least practical overall and you don't get a lot of car for your money. Paying for the image (Apple of cars?)

VW Golf GTi: Best driving of all the cars. Reliability and residuals are good. Insurance and fuel consumption will be higher though.

Mazda3: Very practical and you get plenty of car for your money. However the new styling makes me sad and lacks any wow factor at all. The dullest.

I've actually started looking at slightly bigger cars of this class such as the the Honda Civic i-CTDi and the Audi A3 2.0 TDi Sportback. To meet my needs whilst still being good cars.

Whilst I haven't owned any of these I am looking in this area as well and at the same/similar cars. From speaking to friends and people who own them:

Mini: I just don't like these. Noisy power steering pump (wines like mad) Least practical overall and you don't get a lot of car for your money. Paying for the image (Apple of cars?)

VW Golf GTi: Best driving of all the cars. Reliability and residuals are good. Insurance and fuel consumption will be higher though.

Mazda3: Very practical and you get plenty of car for your money. However the new styling makes me sad and lacks any wow factor at all. The dullest.

I've actually started looking at slightly bigger cars of this class such as the the Honda Civic i-CTDi and the Audi A3 2.0 TDi Sportback. To meet my needs whilst still being good cars.

The Audi A3 TDI is a great looking car, and obviously reliable and excellent on gas too. Just a little on the expensive side!

The Audi A3 TDI is a great looking car, and obviously reliable and excellent on gas too. Just a little on the expensive side!

Just been looking and here the GTI is about the same as the A3 do you Americans pay more?

Are you thinking of the S3?

I'm leaning more towards the Civic. I love the interior (best in class IMHO) just not sure about the styling and rear visibility. It's just starting to look less fresh (if that makes sense).

Good would I love an S3 Sportback tough.

Yep. That's the negative on that one. Is offset a bit by very good residuals on it but still have to stump up the cash.

I'm leaning more towards the Civic. I love the interior (best in class IMHO) just not sure about the styling and rear visibility. It's just starting to look less fresh (if that makes sense).

Good would I love an S3 Sportback tough.

I'm guessing you're in the UK? We don't have S3's in the United States, unfortunately :(

As far the Civic goes, I read it has a lot of build quality issues. Rattles, weird noises etc. On the other hand, while I'm sure the Honda Civic interior is "nice", no interior (not Porsche, not BMW) can compare to that of an Audi. My parents own a 2006 Honda Odyssey and while the interior is nice, full leather etc, it put my 996 Porsche 911 to shame in terms of quality. After getting rid of the 911 and jumping into an Audi S4, well... I've never been so impressed with an interior. Absolutely LOVE Audi interiors.

Just been looking and here the GTI is about the same as the A3 do you Americans pay more?

Are you thinking of the S3?

I'm leaning more towards the Civic. I love the interior (best in class IMHO) just not sure about the styling and rear visibility. It's just starting to look less fresh (if that makes sense).

Good would I love an S3 Sportback tough.

If you get the civic be sure to get the 4 door. I have a huge list of things I hate about the 2 door, but the 4 door fixes all but the tremendously deep dash.

Whoops just edited my post. I thought there was a price difference between the 2 as well but when I looked it up they are vary similar. Surprised me. I've already discounted the GTI though for other reasons.

Ah for the ultimate Audi interior you do have to pay more though. I'd agree that if you max out the spec on the A3 the Audi is great but in terms of what you get for base price or with a small bump I favour the Civic.

Whoops just edited my post. I thought there was a price difference between the 2 as well but when I looked it up they are vary similar. Surprised me. I've already discounted the GTI though for other reasons.

Ah for the ultimate Audi interior you do have to pay more though. I'd agree that if you max out the spec on the A3 the Audi is great but in terms of what you get for base price or with a small bump I favour the Civic.

May I ask why you discount the GTI now?

It was purely personal preference and what I need from the car rather than the car itself and as I said before, thirsty petrol and high insurance as well.

Also I have always found Golfs to be dull looking both inside and out. I may look at a GTI and think "That's a good car" but I've never looked at it and thought "That's a good looking car".

Just finding myself leaning more and more towards the A3 or Civic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!