• 0

[C#] Debug mode works, Start without debugging fails


Question

I have an app which works great (and as expected) when I start and run it in debug mode in VS 2008 Pro. However, when I try to "Start without debugging", the app is a bust. Here's what happens:

  1. I start the program
  2. I start the main part of my program by pushing a button
  3. The operations seem to work fine for a second, but then they don't stop when expected.
  4. Instead, the app starts using nearly 100% of the CPU and when I close it ("X" button) it still keeps running. I have to kill it through the Task Manager.

I'm not sure how to debug this, since (ahhh!) I'm running it without debugging!

Does anyone know how to debug this or has anyone faced similar circumstances? I've looked online and have found next to nothing.

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes, it does take 100% CPU from the debug folder. This is actually how I originally saw the problem, because I didn't want to load VS to run the program, so I tried running the exe from the debug folder and noticed the problem. Does this information suggest a certain problem?

  • 0

I have this in one of the threads:

		private void ....
		{
				.....
				WaitFor(4);
				.....
		}

		private void WaitFor(double seconds)
		{
			DateTime t = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(seconds);
			while (DateTime.Now < t)
			{
				Application.DoEvents();
			}
		}

I know this isn't great design, but needless to say events don't easily work in this situation so I'm stuck with this for now. Could this be causing the 100% CPU usage or cause the app to hang (for more than 4 seconds) and not work?

Thanks for your continued help :-)

  • 0

Actually, it's not my thread loop. It's in one of the threads that is running. Can you explain why I should use Sleep() instead of using "busy waiting + Application.DoEvents()"? I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.

I tried your suggestion and it breaks my application as I need the program running and "doing events", but I still need to wait for some amount of time. If I can avoid it, I don't want to have to wire up events as it will mean re-writing a good amount of my code. Any more ideas :-)

  • 0

		private void ....
		{
				.....
				WaitFor(4);
				.....
		}

		private void WaitFor(double seconds)
		{
			DateTime t = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(seconds);
			while (DateTime.Now < t)
			{
				Application.DoEvents();
				Thread.Sleep(1);
			}
		}

Try this way. It should do events and not waste 100% CPU.

  • 0

Application.DoEvents() doesn't wait if there's nothing the Application engine needs to do. Put the Thread.Sleep() in and you should be good. It sounds like your background thread is eating up all the time. (I usually use Thread.Sleep(500) but I guess 1 should work ok.)

You can also use a System.Timer to call a delegate after the elapsed time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Tech demos are a declaration of desire, an horizon for what they pretend to put on those boxes call consoles (i still laugh at the poor implementation of Hairworks in W3 when you compare it with the demos)...being made on UE5 doesn't give me any confidence considering how poorly it runs in those things, and CDPR is not a marvel in that aspect neither. And about the game, so far is non existent besides the cinematic trailer. If from the get go they have to justify the whys for the protagonist, you start your narrative with the left foot.
    • Seen a 5090 for just over $3,000 at Best Buy just a couple days ago. It wasn't the sticker price that made me laugh... it's knowing that, for now... that kind of investment that includes drivers that don't work, is a headache no one should have to shell out for. But.. it's not the first time Nvidia has choked on crappy drivers, won't be the last.. so, if you spent a pretty penny on the next gen, hang in there... sure they'll get it right some day here soon.
    • Because they and their 801 partners are hungry for your data, and the web is the best facilitator of everything privacy-violating in this day and age... They want all your non-microsoft account data going to microsoft's servers:
    • Sorry, I found your question odd, that's all 😅.
    • "LOL The IoT version is for embedded systems" LOL. The IoT version is for whatever you want, why are you so stuck up? It's just A NAME. Open your mind, buddy 😅. It's not a different version of Windows, only the licensing model and the support dates change, nothing else. "there no real reason to do that" Everyone has their reasons. You love to use Linux. Why? You have YOUR reasons. Other people will have theirs. I use Windows 11 and Linux on the side. Why? I have my reasons. "No security updates? Who cares!" Many people do, just not you. Why not use a supported OS instead of an unsupported one if you can? LOL. I find it odd that a person that loves Linux and choice/freedom so much has such a hard time understanding why people do things different than him.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      m10d earned a badge
      First Post
    • Conversation Starter
      DarkShrunken earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      jrromero17 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jrromero17 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      johnwin1 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      251
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      157
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      140
    5. 5
      Xenon
      128
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!