• 0

[C#] Debug mode works, Start without debugging fails


Question

I have an app which works great (and as expected) when I start and run it in debug mode in VS 2008 Pro. However, when I try to "Start without debugging", the app is a bust. Here's what happens:

  1. I start the program
  2. I start the main part of my program by pushing a button
  3. The operations seem to work fine for a second, but then they don't stop when expected.
  4. Instead, the app starts using nearly 100% of the CPU and when I close it ("X" button) it still keeps running. I have to kill it through the Task Manager.

I'm not sure how to debug this, since (ahhh!) I'm running it without debugging!

Does anyone know how to debug this or has anyone faced similar circumstances? I've looked online and have found next to nothing.

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes, it does take 100% CPU from the debug folder. This is actually how I originally saw the problem, because I didn't want to load VS to run the program, so I tried running the exe from the debug folder and noticed the problem. Does this information suggest a certain problem?

  • 0

I have this in one of the threads:

		private void ....
		{
				.....
				WaitFor(4);
				.....
		}

		private void WaitFor(double seconds)
		{
			DateTime t = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(seconds);
			while (DateTime.Now < t)
			{
				Application.DoEvents();
			}
		}

I know this isn't great design, but needless to say events don't easily work in this situation so I'm stuck with this for now. Could this be causing the 100% CPU usage or cause the app to hang (for more than 4 seconds) and not work?

Thanks for your continued help :-)

  • 0

Actually, it's not my thread loop. It's in one of the threads that is running. Can you explain why I should use Sleep() instead of using "busy waiting + Application.DoEvents()"? I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.

I tried your suggestion and it breaks my application as I need the program running and "doing events", but I still need to wait for some amount of time. If I can avoid it, I don't want to have to wire up events as it will mean re-writing a good amount of my code. Any more ideas :-)

  • 0

		private void ....
		{
				.....
				WaitFor(4);
				.....
		}

		private void WaitFor(double seconds)
		{
			DateTime t = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(seconds);
			while (DateTime.Now < t)
			{
				Application.DoEvents();
				Thread.Sleep(1);
			}
		}

Try this way. It should do events and not waste 100% CPU.

  • 0

Application.DoEvents() doesn't wait if there's nothing the Application engine needs to do. Put the Thread.Sleep() in and you should be good. It sounds like your background thread is eating up all the time. (I usually use Thread.Sleep(500) but I guess 1 should work ok.)

You can also use a System.Timer to call a delegate after the elapsed time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Of course the sales are bad. Who even asked for a thinner phone with way less battery? Lightness? It's still a giant brick, it's just a thinner giant brick. It makes no sense at all. Making folding phones thinner, now that does make sense. Because when folded, the thinner it is unfolded, the more usable and pocketable it is when folded. You already expect worse battery at expense of actually being more pocketable. Galaxy Flip, when folded is half the size of S Ultra models and about as thick. That does make a big difference when fitting it in a pocket. But the phone that's as big as Ultra, making it thinner, you don't really solve anything, it's still a giant slab that barely fits into a pocket. All the "Mini" phones made way more sense than this thin crap. Especially now that it's literally impossible to find a phone smaller than 6.5". My dad only needs phone for calls and SMS and he doesn't want to go with smartphone because they are all so massive. Especially cheaper ones. Like, he'd be fine with Galaxy A06 for all he cares in terms of hardware, but it only comes in giant 6.7" format. It's useless. Or is he suppose to find a 800€ old gen iPhone Mini or Zenfone? He doesn't even need those stupid specs and such stupid price. And then you see old people fumbling around with giant smartphones and they don't even need 3/4 of features on them.
    • its funny now instead of robots built for a specific task which is more efficient we are focused on humanoid robots that are built for do anything but might not do it as well because of restrictions similar to how human body works and they were molded after...
    • 3,900 mAh. When compared to the S25 Ultra (5,000), the S25+ (4,900) and the S25 (4,000), it has the worst battery of them all, all because of that slim size. Everything comes with sacrifices.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      669
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      271
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      218
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      163
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      162
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!