• 0

[C#] Debug mode works, Start without debugging fails


Question

I have an app which works great (and as expected) when I start and run it in debug mode in VS 2008 Pro. However, when I try to "Start without debugging", the app is a bust. Here's what happens:

  1. I start the program
  2. I start the main part of my program by pushing a button
  3. The operations seem to work fine for a second, but then they don't stop when expected.
  4. Instead, the app starts using nearly 100% of the CPU and when I close it ("X" button) it still keeps running. I have to kill it through the Task Manager.

I'm not sure how to debug this, since (ahhh!) I'm running it without debugging!

Does anyone know how to debug this or has anyone faced similar circumstances? I've looked online and have found next to nothing.

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes, it does take 100% CPU from the debug folder. This is actually how I originally saw the problem, because I didn't want to load VS to run the program, so I tried running the exe from the debug folder and noticed the problem. Does this information suggest a certain problem?

  • 0

I have this in one of the threads:

		private void ....
		{
				.....
				WaitFor(4);
				.....
		}

		private void WaitFor(double seconds)
		{
			DateTime t = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(seconds);
			while (DateTime.Now < t)
			{
				Application.DoEvents();
			}
		}

I know this isn't great design, but needless to say events don't easily work in this situation so I'm stuck with this for now. Could this be causing the 100% CPU usage or cause the app to hang (for more than 4 seconds) and not work?

Thanks for your continued help :-)

  • 0

Actually, it's not my thread loop. It's in one of the threads that is running. Can you explain why I should use Sleep() instead of using "busy waiting + Application.DoEvents()"? I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.

I tried your suggestion and it breaks my application as I need the program running and "doing events", but I still need to wait for some amount of time. If I can avoid it, I don't want to have to wire up events as it will mean re-writing a good amount of my code. Any more ideas :-)

  • 0

		private void ....
		{
				.....
				WaitFor(4);
				.....
		}

		private void WaitFor(double seconds)
		{
			DateTime t = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(seconds);
			while (DateTime.Now < t)
			{
				Application.DoEvents();
				Thread.Sleep(1);
			}
		}

Try this way. It should do events and not waste 100% CPU.

  • 0

Application.DoEvents() doesn't wait if there's nothing the Application engine needs to do. Put the Thread.Sleep() in and you should be good. It sounds like your background thread is eating up all the time. (I usually use Thread.Sleep(500) but I guess 1 should work ok.)

You can also use a System.Timer to call a delegate after the elapsed time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They already are small. Have you seen the size of Linux icons?
    • I thought I could download the ringtone.
    • Foxconn to make iPhone casings in India as Apple shifts more production from China by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar It was recently reported that Donald Trump was unhappy with Tim Cook and threatened Apple with a 25% tariff if iPhones weren't produced in America. While the exact reason is unclear, some speculated that Trump's anger had to do with Cook skipping the Middle East trip with him, which was attended by other major company CEOs. Many believed that Apple came under the radar because of its plans for a $1.5 billion iPhone production plant in India. True or not, Apple is facing a tough situation as Trump has already imposed hefty tariffs on China, where the majority of iPhones are made. In a move to reduce dependence on China, Apple planned to shift its production from China to India, where tariffs are relatively lower. In line with this, a fresh report by The Economic Times suggests that Apple's iPhone assembler, Foxconn, has decided to start producing iPhone casings in India. Sources claim that a new unit is being planned at the ESR Industrial Park in Oragadam, Tamil Nadu. The area is close to the upcoming display module manufacturing plant. Until now, Tata Electronics was the one producing iPhone casings in India. However, Foxconn, which was assembling iPhones in the country at its plant in Sriperumbudur, will start making iPhone casings as well. This move suggests that Foxconn is helping Apple move more production out of China to India. Prabhu Ram, vice president, industry research group, CyberMedia Research, said, Foxconn has already ramped up its India push. The company recently started production of Apple AirPods in Hyderabad for exports and is also setting up an iPhone production plant in Bengaluru. Casings only make up about 2-3% of the total iPhone cost, making them locally helps Apple reduce costs, and also helps avoid hefty tariffs.
    • I loved the initial compact Start Menu present in Windows 10. It was tiny, awesome and super fast without any Store apps clutter.
    • BBC threatens Perplexity with legal action over content scraping by Paul Hill Image via Depositphotos.com The UK’s public broadcaster, BBC, has written a letter to Perplexity, the AI search startup, asking it to stop scraping articles from its websites, delete existing copies of content, and propose some sort of financial compensation if it would like to carry on scraping data. If the demands are not met, BBC may seek an injunction against the startup citing alleged misuse of its intellectual property. BBC is probably responding in this way because it has seen other news organizations cement deals with firms like OpenAI and Mistral. The income stream allows news organizations to raise more funds and also cover the costs of the extra load on their servers caused by AI scraping. For anybody not familiar with Perplexity, it’s a bit like ChatGPT but has a much stronger emphasis on searching the web to find information. You can ask it anything you want to know about and it very quickly searches online and constructs a specific response to your question based on what it has found. The company offers many of its features for free, but does have Perplexity Pro, which costs money. Essentially, Perplexity is making money from publishers by using their content to improve its own product, but not paying them all. Perplexity's defense and existing publisher programs In a statement to the Financial Times, Perplexity labeled the BBC’s claims as "manipulative and opportunistic". The startup accused the broadcaster of having “a fundamental misunderstanding of technology, the internet and intellectual property law.” This is not the first time Perplexity has had a run-in with the media. Forbes and Wired accused it of plagiarizing content from their websites and The New York Times sent the company a cease and desist notice to stop using its content for AI purposes. To assuage publishers, Perplexity has set up a revenue sharing program, which includes TIME, Fortune, Der Spiegel, and others. According to Digiday, the revenue share was up to 25%. It’s not clear if BBC has tried engaging through this avenue or if it wants to try to squeeze the startup for a bigger slice. The escalating battle over AI and intellectual property Even if you only keep up with AI developments in passing, you’ll likely have seen that AI models need to be trained on vast amounts of data, much of which is copyrighted. There is an ongoing debate about whether these companies should be allowed to train on this data, or first seek out permission from the copyright holders. The move from the BBC could spur other publishers on to try and get themselves a better deal from Perplexity. Alternatively, Perplexity could remove BBC content from its platform and stop pulling information from there. It could probably find most of the information elsewhere, but if Perplexity tried to pull this too much it would eventually end up pretty useless with not a lot of content. Overall, this is just one of many ongoing legal issues surrounding AI, but once a conclusion has been reached, it could set a precedent about how AI companies should go about getting content from publishers. Source: FT via Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      678
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      274
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      220
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      171
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      160
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!