Apple now offering 20-inch education iMac for $899


Recommended Posts

Apple now offering 20-inch education iMac for $899

Apple has replaced the 17-inch educational iMac with a 20-inch model selling for the same price. The upgraded version is pretty nice for only $899, but it can only be ordered by educational institution buyers.

For quite a few years now, Apple has offered an educational desktop machine at a lower price point than the rest of its desktop line. That machine was first the eMac, followed by the 17-inch iMac, but now there's a new educational model in town. Apple has quietly announced (PDF) that it has replaced the 17-inch polycarbonate education iMac with a new, low-end 20-inch aluminum model, marking the end of the polycarbonate iMac case.

Previously, Apple was offering educational institutions the 17-inch iMac model for the same $899 price, so the switch is a nice upgrade. The new model includes a 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo processor, 1GB of RAM, a 160GB hard drive, a SuperDrive, and the NVIDIA 9400M graphics package. All in all, not a bad deal for nine Franklins.

The new educational iMacs are supposed to ship in about four weeks, but even if you want to just order one now, they're pretty hard to get. The low-end 20-incher isn't currently available to individual students or educational buyers, so you may need to make friends with your institutional buyer if you want to get your hands on one (an iMac, that is).

Source: Ars Technica

20-inch my laptop has a bigger screen than that , $899 for 1GB of RAM what a joke.

Still Trolling I see.

I don't even know why you frequent the Mac sections of Neowin given your bias against Mac's.

We know you don't like Mac's and you Love PC's, and disregard any statement made by people who have valid points.

Your laptop is windows, A HP from memory, and isn't exactly a "laptop", any more then a MacBook Pro is a "laptop"

Mine is a portable computer, and if I am running anything heavy - its never on my lap.

Yours, at 20" is a portable desktop, and certainly not something I would want on my lap in any circumstance.

Only recently have computers come out in the PC environment that have a similar form factor to the iMac, and every indication I have seen so far, points at them having the same "<INSERT VENDOR HERE> Tax"

You prefer the windows market, good for you - just don't expect everyone here to accept your view.

I certainly would not purchase your "laptop" I would prefer the Dell Adamo - and that has the "Dell Tax" which currently prices it as more expensive then the MacBooks, and I am not sure about the MacBook Air's - of course I would never buy one of those either.

It's the same argument my friends used between Sharp and Sony MiniDisc players. Sharp might have had more features, Sony might have had less - but the Sharp was also thicker and heavier then the Sony, and I only required what it did. I didn't object to paying the "Sony Tax" then for a machine that met my requirements, just like I don't object to paying the "Apple Tax" for a machine that meets my requirements (Self Upgrade / Gaming) isn't one of them.

With a decent sized hard disk, any RAM upgrades (Which is all I have ever upgraded on notebooks) can be done third party - if you find a retailer that realises that there is no such thing as "Mac Ram". My Current MBP runs Kingston Ram.

And if I was a gamer, I wouldn't be purchasing a laptop for gaming in the first place, nor if I wanted to upgrade the machine myself.

I maintain computers (Roughly 50/50 Mac/Win) in the education sector on occasion, and whatever the "Apple Tax" I find that maintaining modern Intel Mac's far more streamlined then maintaining windows machines, I also find the Aluminium Models superior compared to the Polycarb's.

In all cases we upgrade these machines to 2GB these days anyway.

This should be great to see in classrooms more often.

If you want a true comparison regarding ease of use, give an class or two of 8-10 year old students a task requiring movie editing, recording, photo slide shows, and burning - and compare the results on a Mac with the latest iLife Suite installed, compared to a Windows machine with the latest versions of Photostory, Windows Movie Maker etc.

Windows could achieve this degree of interaction if they wanted too, too but the manner in which they integrate products has always risked anti-trust law suits as they build it into the system at such a level its near impossible for the end user to remove, or for third party, open source developers to access.

If Windows Movie Maker or Internet Explorer were as easy to remove as deleting C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer or C:\Program Files\Windows Movie Maker - without crippling the system, Microsoft wouldn't have been in the same position regarding Anti-Trust lawsuits.

My point was what will a ultra low end $899 PC contribute to education ? Given the state of funding in ireland and many other places around the world anyone who puts one of these on a school budget should be shot considering you could have a Shuttle k45 up and running with the same specs for 260 bucks.

But thanks for turning this into a generic Mac/PC debate , Heven forbid anyone would see the real issue , That these overpriced trashcans are going to end up running vista and being a humongous waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere .

Reminds me of E-Voting

Edited by bob21

^I think the point is that Apple is nice enough to give students, getting an education, a nice discount on their product/s.

It's not always about what's the best or "fastest" computer to get for the money.

Some people just want a Mac, and there's absolutely no reason to diss them for buying one.

Okay, it's your point. But it's not the point of the article...

You're really beating the dead horse when you still try to fight that you can buy something "better" for the money.

It's a shallow thing to say, and you don't have to be a "Mac Fanboy" to understand that it's not one bit about the money.

No again thats not my point , Good luck to any student who wants one .

Its their purchase and use in schools that im completely opposed to for the reasons above . Its just a humongous waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere .

You clearly did not get the purpose of this iMac. It's not for an individual, it's for a school. For computer laboratories (or whatever they're called).

If a student wants one, he has to buy the other models Apple sells, which are IMO a better value for the buck. Then he has to bring it home. The other one has to stay in school.

No again thats not my point , Good luck to any student who wants one .

Its their purchase and use in schools that im completely opposed to for the reasons above . Its just a humongous waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere .

Ok that one I will bite on given I manage both Mac's and PC's in school environments.

So a Mac in a school is a waste of money huh?

How many PC's still run in schools 10 years down the track, and run relatively reliably?

5 years down the track if they still run we just want to get rid of them, but don't have the funding to replace them.. The Mac's generally last 10 years with Ram upgrades. (And no they are not purchased at the apple store)

How many PC's can you boot from an external HD and image in 10-20 minutes?

(And yes I do have network imaging in place)

How many of your 8-10 year old students are producing movies on Windows Platforms which compare in quality to those created on Mac?

You have Monkey Jam / a Web Cam / Windows Movie Maker as the tools for doing Stop Motion.

And I have yet to see one example where the quality or ease of use of the windows solution beats the Mac.

How much time do you spend pushing out patches, virus updates, and fixing malware on your PC's?

What about USB Keys, and the Autorun Entry, the fact students bring games into school and do whatever they can to get out of class - up to and including - physically damaging the machine so it doesn't work, and then claiming they can't work because the computers broken. Mac's take a hell of a lot more of a beating then a PC.

We were forced to replace one Lab of PC's after 3 years due to student damage. You want to talk about a waste of money? How about the hours spent in fixing malicious or accidental damage to machines, where keyboards are pulled apart, cables are cut or network points are pushed in. The DVD Drives the students get given access to, enabling them to produces movies on DVD that have the drive bands cut.

Having managed both, I don't try and push PC's out of schools, because they will need to know them, but why shouldn't we allow students to experience more then one environment. The first thing I do in some schools is setup a PC server to support the Windows machines - to run Antivirus and WSUS, to handle other windows only applications.

I learnt on Mac's and PC's. The students at the schools I was at produced some amazing artworks, while all the PC's were used for was cheap vb games, or typing practice and word.

If all you want your kids to learn is how to type, sure get a PC.

But don't think its the only damn alternative out there.

Modern Mac's run windows these days as well, which any machine in the places I maintain have the ability to do, just to support programs and websites designed by people just as biased as you are showing yourself to be.

Not everything in education comes down to the cost of a product.

Or would you prefer your kids being taught in a classroom built by the cheapest bidder, by underpaid teachers, with computers that fall apart if you sneeze at them forced to cater for the lowest denominator - "Because its a cheaper alternative, the money could be spent better elsewhere...."

Like it or not, other people disagree with your view, and see Mac's as an Asset, not a line on a balance sheet to be reduced.

Edited by Caledai
Ok that one I will bite on given I manage both Mac's and PC's in school environments.

So a Mac in a school is a waste of money huh?

How many PC's still run in schools 10 years down the track, and run relatively reliably?

5 years down the track if they still run we just want to get rid of them, but don't have the funding to replace them.. The Mac's generally last 10 years with Ram upgrades. (And no they are not purchased at the apple store)

How many PC's can you boot from an external HD and image in 10-20 minutes?

(And yes I do have network imaging in place)

How many of your 8-10 year old students are producing movies on Windows Platforms which compare in quality to those created on Mac?

You have Monkey Jam / a Web Cam / Windows Movie Maker as the tools for doing Stop Motion.

And I have yet to see one example where the quality or ease of use of the windows solution beats the Mac.

How much time do you spend pushing out patches, virus updates, and fixing malware on your PC's?

What about USB Keys, and the Autorun Entry, the fact students bring games into school and do whatever they can to get out of class - up to and including - physically damaging the machine so it doesn't work, and then claiming they can't work because the computers broken. Mac's take a hell of a lot more of a beating then a PC.

We were forced to replace one Lab of PC's after 3 years due to student damage. You want to talk about a waste of money? How about the hours spent in fixing malicious or accidental damage to machines, where keyboards are pulled apart, cables are cut or network points are pushed in. The DVD Drives the students get given access to, enabling them to produces movies on DVD that have the drive bands cut.

Having managed both, I don't try and push PC's out of schools, because they will need to know them, but why shouldn't we allow students to experience more then one environment. The first thing I do in some schools is setup a PC server to support the Windows machines - to run Antivirus and WSUS, to handle other windows only applications.

I learnt on Mac's and PC's. The students at the schools I was at produced some amazing artworks, while all the PC's were used for was cheap vb games, or typing practice and word.

If all you want your kids to learn is how to type, sure get a PC.

But don't think its the only damn alternative out there.

Mac's in schools are not a waste of money. Employing people who refuse to deal with Mac's out of a personal bias is.

Modern Mac's run windows these days as well, which any machine in the places I maintain have the ability to do, just to support programs and websites designed by people just as biased as you are showing yourself to be.

Not everything in education comes down to the cost of a product.

Or would you prefer your kids being taught in a classroom built by the cheapest bidder, by underpaid teachers, with computers that fall apart if you sneeze at them forced to cater for the lowest denominator - "Because its a cheaper alternative, the money could be spent better elsewhere...."

Like it or not, other people disagree with your view, and see Mac's as an Asset, not a line on a balance sheet to be reduced.

Talk about blowing something out of proportion.

There's a difference between a compromise in quality and flat out buying unnecessary things. Macs might be useful in elementary schools, but if secondary and post-secondary students are so incompetent that they can't figure out how to use Windows Movie Maker and a webcam or their teachers aren't able to, uhh, teach them, then there are probably bigger issues here.

Your argument on students destroying more PCs than Macs is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, I won't even reply to that.

Macs last 10 years? Please. My university has a dozen eMacs that sit in the corner because no one wants to use them. Hell, people ditched those green iMacs with the hockey puck mice at my high-school a year after the school bought them. Talk about a waste of money.

It's also funny you should mention "practicing typing on a PC", because in the 90s during my own elementary days, the only things those Macs were good for were using All the Right Type (LOL) and Kid Pix. Since these are my tax dollars being spent here, I see almost no reason for schools to spend money on Macs (for GENERAL USE) when that money could be MUCH better spent on smaller classroom sizes, more/better teachers, or pretty much anything else.

Edited by ienhz

Ok that one I will bite on given I manage both Mac's and PC's in school environments.

[b]So a Mac in a school is a waste of money huh?
[/b]
How many PC's still run in schools 10 years down the track, and run relatively reliably?   
5 years down the track if they still run we just want to get rid of them, but don't have the funding to replace them..  The Mac's generally last 10 years with Ram upgrades.  (And no they are not purchased at the apple store)

Same Parts Same Reliably.

How many PC's can you boot from an external HD and image in 10-20 minutes?  
(And yes I do have network imaging in place)

Any.

How many of your 8-10 year old students are producing movies on Windows Platforms which compare in quality to those created on Mac?

Premier elements

You have Monkey Jam / a Web Cam / Windows Movie Maker as the tools for doing Stop Motion.
And I have yet to see one example where the quality or ease of use of the windows solution beats the Mac.

Premier Elements

How much time do you spend pushing out patches, virus updates, and fixing malware on your PC's?

Security through obscurity isn't security at all

What about USB Keys, and the Autorun Entry, the fact students bring games into school and do whatever they can to get out of class - up to and including - physically damaging the machine so it doesn't work, and then claiming they can't work because the computers broken.   Mac's take a hell of a lot more of a beating then a PC.

Administrator privileges

We were forced to replace one Lab of PC's after 3 years due to student damage.   You want to talk about a waste of money?   How about the hours spent in fixing malicious or accidental damage to machines, where keyboards are pulled apart, cables are cut or network points are pushed in.   The DVD Drives the students get given access to, enabling them to produces movies on DVD that have the drive bands cut.

Replacing a DVD drive is cheeper than replacing an entire computer

Having managed both, I don't try and push PC's out of schools, because they will need to know them, but why shouldn't we allow students to experience more then one environment.   The first thing I do in some schools is setup a PC server to support the Windows machines - to run Antivirus and WSUS, to handle other windows only applications.

Don't worry you'll be running windows on them whenever someone wants to run education software like PROE

I learnt on Mac's and PC's.   The students at the schools I was at produced some amazing artworks, while all the PC's were used for was cheap vb games, or typing practice and word.

Photoshop Elements

If all you want your kids to learn is how to type, sure get a PC.   
But don't think its the only damn alternative out there.

No i want them to learn to use the software they will need for third level like autocad its just a fact that these applications are windows only .

Mac's in schools are not a waste of money.  Employing people who refuse to deal with Mac's out of a personal bias is.

Oh yes they are when you consider they cost 500 bucks extra and that dosnt include the 250 bucks for vista .

Modern Mac's run windows these days as well, which any machine in the places I maintain have the ability to do, just to support programs and websites designed by people just as biased as you are showing yourself to be.

Thats another 250 bucks to add to the extra 500

Not everything in education comes down to the cost of a product.

When its going to do the same thing for 500 bucks more its some cost

Or would you prefer your kids being taught in a classroom built by the cheapest bidder, by underpaid teachers, with computers that fall apart if you sneeze at them forced to cater for the lowest denominator - "Because its a cheaper alternative, the money could be spent better elsewhere...."

If its going to have the exact same specs for 500 bucks less then yes.

[b]Like it or not, other people disagree with your view, and see Mac's as an Asset, not a line on a balance sheet to be reduced.[/b]

I see them as a waste of 500 bucks that could be better spent elsewhere , Anyone who doesn't will learn the hard way when they have a 900$ computer running vista ($250) which i could outspec for ?300.

Edited by bob21
Ok that one I will bite on given I manage both Mac's and PC's in school environments.

[b]So a Mac in a school is a waste of money huh?
[/b]
How many PC's still run in schools 10 years down the track, and run relatively reliably?   
5 years down the track if they still run we just want to get rid of them, but don't have the funding to replace them..  The Mac's generally last 10 years with Ram upgrades.  (And no they are not purchased at the apple store)

Same Parts Same Reliably.

How many PC's can you boot from an external HD and image in 10-20 minutes?  
(And yes I do have network imaging in place)

Any.

How many of your 8-10 year old students are producing movies on Windows Platforms which compare in quality to those created on Mac?

Premier elements

You have Monkey Jam / a Web Cam / Windows Movie Maker as the tools for doing Stop Motion.
And I have yet to see one example where the quality or ease of use of the windows solution beats the Mac.

Premier Elements

How much time do you spend pushing out patches, virus updates, and fixing malware on your PC's?

Security through obscurity isn't security at all

What about USB Keys, and the Autorun Entry, the fact students bring games into school and do whatever they can to get out of class - up to and including - physically damaging the machine so it doesn't work, and then claiming they can't work because the computers broken.   Mac's take a hell of a lot more of a beating then a PC.

Administrator privileges

We were forced to replace one Lab of PC's after 3 years due to student damage.   You want to talk about a waste of money?   How about the hours spent in fixing malicious or accidental damage to machines, where keyboards are pulled apart, cables are cut or network points are pushed in.   The DVD Drives the students get given access to, enabling them to produces movies on DVD that have the drive bands cut.

Replacing a DVD drive is cheeper than replacing an entire computer

Having managed both, I don't try and push PC's out of schools, because they will need to know them, but why shouldn't we allow students to experience more then one environment.   The first thing I do in some schools is setup a PC server to support the Windows machines - to run Antivirus and WSUS, to handle other windows only applications.

Don't worry you'll be running windows on them whenever someone wants to run education software like PROE

I learnt on Mac's and PC's.   The students at the schools I was at produced some amazing artworks, while all the PC's were used for was cheap vb games, or typing practice and word.

Photoshop Elements

If all you want your kids to learn is how to type, sure get a PC.   
But don't think its the only damn alternative out there.

No i want them to learn to use the software they will need for third level like autocad its just a fact that these applications are windows only .

Oh yes they are when you consider they cost 500 bucks extra and that dosnt include the 250 bucks for vista .

Modern Mac's run windows these days as well, which any machine in the places I maintain have the ability to do, just to support programs and websites designed by people just as biased as you are showing yourself to be.

Thats another 250 bucks to add to the extra 500

Not everything in education comes down to the cost of a product.

When its going to do the same thing for 500 bucks more its some cost

Or would you prefer your kids being taught in a classroom built by the cheapest bidder, by underpaid teachers, with computers that fall apart if you sneeze at them forced to cater for the lowest denominator - "Because its a cheaper alternative, the money could be spent better elsewhere...."

If its going to have the exact same specs for 500 bucks less then yes.

[b]Like it or not, other people disagree with your view, and see Mac's as an Asset, not a line on a balance sheet to be reduced.[/b]

I see them as a waste of 500 bucks that could be better spent elsewhere , Anyone who doesn't will learn the hard way when they have a 900$ computer running vista ($250) which i could outspec for ?300.

Ah, so in other words, the money you save on using hardware with a different build quality - is spent on software licensing to do the same things....

Now multiply the cost of replacing 30x DVD Drives.... A site license for Adobe (Considering the Adobe Premier Elements is 150 for a consumer) and you assume that every school has to purchase its own licenses for Microsoft Products, or all these CAD Programs you mention, of which in any school I have seen, hmm short of Visual Studio - 3 instances of Professional CAD programs.

Personally I don't care what you claim about same parts, same reliability - In my experience, your wrong.

Every statement I have made, is backed up by my experience at work, maintaining computers in a variety of settings.

When you have machines that are Celeron 800 MHz falling to pieces around you with motherboards dying, dead DVD drives due to damage and misuse, graphic cards which fail and USB Ports burning out - compared to iMac 400MHz and 500MHz still chugging along, with the only component needing to be replaced on a rare occasion is a HD, your argument is falling flat or perhaps at most one other hardware failure in a year among close to 100 computers - I think my own experience is more valuable.

I am not talking figures, I am talking the work I do day in, day out.

I spend more time, per machine fixing machines that are "PC's" compared to Macs.

I spend more time fixing up machines that are patched (via WSUS) removing viruses (protected by Corporate AV) and with security policies in place, that end users fill up with spyware, malware, trojans, games, dozens of "Helper Apps" etc compared to the occasional time I need to reload a Mac, repair its permissions or run a file system check.

I never said Mac's exclusively, I said refusing to buy Mac's based on price is stupid when there are other advantages you blindly ignore, or seem to resolve by referring to other products that need to be purchased.

The next point to address - is over spec'ing a machine - out of heavy duty Multimedia or CAD Labs - where have you seen machines at Max Spec? Or are you suggesting that they should run machines that have 8gb ram, 3ghz quad core machines, just to run word because they can?

With your eye on the bottom line, I am not surprised your not pushing Linux at schools, just to save the $250 license fee of Vista....

<sarcasm>Oh wait - the CAD Programs people rarely use in an education environment - that we must teach 8-9 year old kids to use because they are so important to there future, don't run on linux..... </sarcasm>

Why don't you give up your trolling of the Apple sections of Neowin, and run back to the Windows sections.

You don't like Mac's (As you have repeatedly stated), you never will (Again as you have repeatedly stated), and personally - you don't have a chance in hell of convincing most of the people here so your wasting your time here.

And so am I, as I know your personal bias is going to kick in here as well, so long, I wont be checking this thread again as your not worth my time, because yes it is worth something, and debating this with you isn't.

No again thats not my point , Good luck to any student who wants one .

Its their purchase and use in schools that im completely opposed to for the reasons above . Its just a humongous waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere .

Couldn't agree more. With that money you can buy 2 pc's. And seriously,apple computers aren't for study,at least if you want IT. At my university we study IT and a major part of it is based on linux because there's a lot to learn from it,multithreading,processes scheduling,file descriptors,pipes etc. And you can't have linux on an apple computer as far as I know. And we also learn asm x86 and the best environments for that are windows or linux.

Couldn't agree more. With that money you can buy 2 pc's. And seriously,apple computers aren't for study,at least if you want IT. At my university we study IT and a major part of it is based on linux because there's a lot to learn from it,multithreading,processes scheduling,file descriptors,pipes etc. And you can't have linux on an apple computer as far as I know. And we also learn asm x86 and the best environments for that are windows or linux.

Agreed, and good luck to students who would want to develop games or wpf applications on Macs with 1 gb.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!