Ubuntu 9.04 and PS3


Recommended Posts

I recently installed Ubuntu 9.04 (build 200409) post-RC.

I am having trouble with audio on the PS3. It can find the audio device and everything seems to be ok except I cannot hear anything.

I have gone into Sound preferences and everything is on Auto Detect and when i press Test it says its testing but no sound. \

Any help greatly appreciated :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/762718-ubuntu-904-and-ps3/
Share on other sites

Launch a terminal and type in "amixer".

See if any of the bars have MM below them (MM means muted). If so, select the bar and click the M key on your keyboard to unmute it.

EDIT: Ugh, only noticed now that you're using PulseAudio. Not sure of how much help this tip can be, since amixer is alsamixer. :/

Edited by brentaal

That's what I downloaded. The full 9.04 release for PlayStation 3. It actually runs pretty well. I also enabled the ps3vram to swap space and it can run multiple applications much better now.

Anyway, Ubuntu is using PulseAudio, and neither ALSA, OSS or pulse work.

OSS keeps displayin an error while testing audio, ALSA plays the test with no sound and PulseAudio plays the test with no sound.

Its really annoying me. cant make Linux a media server with no sound :(

openSUSE 11.1 and YDL 6.1 worked fine with sound (with a little playing around) but this is just getting on my nerves.

Thanks for all the feedback people. I managed to fix the problem (sort of).

I think its a bug with HDMI autodetecting and ALSA. I plugged in my composite cords and connected the white and red cord to my stereo system. Now, sound works via composite and video works via HDMI.

Although sound still does not work via HDMI I am able to run sound atleast through my stereo.

On a side note, anyone looking to install any Linux distro on their PS3 and own a 768p HDTV, try the following for installation at KBoot:

install video=ps3fb:mode:155 -c

This will give Linux the screen resolution of 768p at Full RGB.

Thanks again for the help peeps :)

Wow. :blink:

You put more effort into this than I would have. I would have given up, but glad that perseverance paid off for you. And thanks for posting your solution here, so others could find. (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!