Power consumption with high CPU usage


Recommended Posts

I was wondering what difference there is between a typical desktop computer that uses a lot of CPU for number crunching compared to a computer that runs less intensive activities.

Would a desktop that averages 10% CPU usage use significantly less power than an idential desktop that averages 90% or would they both use roughly the same amount of power? I have tried to look up rough figures of power consumption versus CPU usage for a typical desktop PC but had no luck. Any ideas?

You will notice a difference in energy usage, I did when I was running the F@H Client, whilst running the client I used significantly more energy and ultimately had to stop because I couldn't afford to run it. Sorry but I can't give you any figures :(

Yes, a desktop that averages 10% CPU usage would use less power than a desktop that averages 90% CPU usage. It depends on what kind of application we're talking about. If we're talking about gaming, and the CPU usage is pretty high, you have to figure in the graphics card is also drawing a lot of power too (graphics cards draw more power when under load compared to idle), so therefore the total system is using more energy than say if it was just browsing the web.

If you're worried about power consumption, you can look into the Intel Atom, Via processors, and AMD also has some low wattage processors. Again, it depends on what apps you're trying to run. If you're just browsing the web, doing office documents, then a Atom processor should be fine.

  hjf288 said:
With my comp idle according to Gigabyte Energy Saving Tool my CPU uses about 6.9 - 7 Watts.

At 83% CPU Usage it rises to about 32Watts

Wow that seems pretty low considering a Intel Core 2 Duo has a tdp of 45W and the Quads and Core i7 are 90W+, not sure of the exact figure.

TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

You will always have some kind of difference between low and high CPU usage, but how big the difference is depends on the CPU. For example a power hungry CPU like a Pentium 4 would have a larger power usage difference between low and high load than say for example a 45nm Core 2 Duo.

  GrimReeper said:
Wow that seems pretty low considering a Intel Core 2 Duo has a tdp of 45W and the Quads and Core i7 are 90W+, not sure of the exact figure.

Most C2Ds actually have a TDP of about 65 watts, and the quads about 100-110w at stock clocks.

  hjf288 said:
With my comp idle according to Gigabyte Energy Saving Tool my CPU uses about 6.9 - 7 Watts.

At 83% CPU Usage it rises to about 32Watts

Doesn't make sense because if that were the case you could run your computer on a 150W PSU 'cause 32W at 83% load would give you less than 25% load on your PSU...

  Frank Fontaine said:
You will always have some kind of difference between low and high CPU usage, but how big the difference is depends on the CPU. For example a power hungry CPU like a Pentium 4 would have a larger power usage difference between low and high load than say for example a 45nm Core 2 Duo.

Most C2Ds actually have a TDP of about 65 watts, and the quads about 100-110w at stock clocks.

95W for 45nm variants, as well as G0 Revision Q6600m 105W for B3 revision ;)

  Atlonite said:
TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

I didn't realize. Thanks for the heads up :) I've never used tdp for measuring power usage I always used it to determine what to buy so I could use passive heat sinks without frying things haha :p I just assumed it was related but I was wrong :(

  shift. said:
Doesn't make sense because if that were the case you could run your computer on a 150W PSU 'cause 32W at 83% load would give you less than 25% load on your PSU...

95W for 45nm variants, as well as G0 Revision Q6600m 105W for B3 revision ;)

Without a meter i cant really check but thats what the gigabyte tool says, Processor is Q6600 undervolted.

  Atlonite said:
TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

Actually, they are relatively close in fact.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_power_dissipation

"Some CPUs (i.E. newer Intel-CPUs) have the typical power consumption defined as TDP and some (like CPUs from AMD) have the maximum power consumption defined as TDP."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is only available on Echo shows and the U.S. at the moment, so a million is pretty good I suppose. I hope when it does come to us all it can be disabled if not wanted, without having to get rid of Amazon Prime.
    • Uber wants to bring them to London, not that I live in London, but even if I did, I would not use them. I prefer having a human driving the car, not rely on some computer.
    • There is nobody to challenge the status quo. Foldables have not taken off as expected. People are holding onto their existing phones for a lot longer. There is movement happening in the handheld console space, but those are not phones. Both Apple and Google are involved in legal fights. Yet they have to stick to releasing a new OS every year... It all adds up.
    • Elon Musk once again claims Tesla robotaxis are coming soon by David Uzondu Image via Depositphotos.com Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, has announced a tentative start date of June 22 for the company's long-awaited public robotaxi service. According to a post on his social media platform X, the initial launch will be in Austin, Texas. Musk added a significant condition, however, saying "We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift." The service is expected to begin with just 10 to 20 Model Y SUVs operating within a limited area and with remote human supervision. He also mentioned a plan starting June 28 for new Teslas to drive themselves from the factory to a customer's home. This is a moment many are probably waiting for, though it comes with a heavy dose of skepticism. Musk has made grand promises about self-driving before. This robotaxi network brings to mind the bold claims from all the way back in 2019 when the company said a similar service would launch the following year. That evidently did not happen. Federal regulators also have their doubts. Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration criticized Tesla for making its "Full Self-Driving" feature sound more capable than it actually is, demanding the company align its marketing with reality. Tesla is also driving into a field that is no longer empty. Waymo, Google's sibling company, is already a major player, offering hundreds of thousands of paid rides per week across Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and even Austin. The company is so far ahead that it has begun testing in Tokyo. But being ahead means Waymo is also the first to face certain dangers. For example, on the evening of June 8, a group of protesters in downtown Los Angeles summoned Waymo vehicles during a demonstration. When the vehicles arrived, they slashed the tires, smashed the windows, and spray-painted the cars before setting three of them on fire. Which raises a thorny question for Tesla: if you can summon a car with no one inside, can you summon it just to destroy it? It's one thing for protesters to stumble upon a robotaxi and vandalize it; it's another for someone to use the app to call a driverless car to a secluded spot for a planned attack. With public sentiment around Musk so divided, especially given his DOGE shenanigans and his recent face off with Donald Trump, that's not just a theoretical problem. We've already seen this hostility play out in attacks where people vandalize Teslas, carving swastikas into them and spray painting slogans like "Burn More Teslas" on walls.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Food-Beverages-Nutrition earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Tech Dogs earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Enthusiast
      computerdave91111 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Week One Done
      Falisha Manpower earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      elsa777 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      199
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      195
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      138
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!